Cargando…

Tolerability and pharmacokinetics of non-fixed and fixed combinations of artesunate and amodiaquine in Malaysian healthy normal volunteers

OBJECTIVE: There is limited pharmacokinetic data available for the combination artesunate + amodiaquine, which is used widely to treat uncomplicated malaria. This study examines the bioavailability and tolerability of a fixed (200 mg artesunate + 540 mg amodiaquine) and loose (200 mg + 612 mg) combi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Navaratnam, Visweswaran, Ramanathan, Surash, Wahab, Mohd Suhaimi Ab., Siew Hua, Gan, Mansor, Sharif Mahsufi, Kiechel, Jean-René, Vaillant, Michel, Taylor, Walter R. J., Olliaro, Piero
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2714898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19404632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-009-0656-1
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: There is limited pharmacokinetic data available for the combination artesunate + amodiaquine, which is used widely to treat uncomplicated malaria. This study examines the bioavailability and tolerability of a fixed (200 mg artesunate + 540 mg amodiaquine) and loose (200 mg + 612 mg) combination with a 2×2 cross-over design in 24 healthy volunteers. METHODS: Parent compounds and metabolites [dihydroartemisinin (DHA) and desethylamodiaquine (DEAQ)] were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography–electrochemical detection, and the area under the curve (AUC)(0-t) and C(max) were compared by an analysis of variance (ANOVA) based on geometric least square means using the Schuirmann two one-sided test. RESULTS: The AUC(0-t) for total DHA and DEAQ were 1522 ± 633 and 30021 ± 14211 ng h/ml for the fixed products and 1688 ± 767 and 40261 ± 19824 ng h/ml (mean ± standard deviation) for the loose products. The ANOVA showed no statistical differences except for sequence effect for DHA. The values obtained with the fixed product were within the 125% bioequivalent limits but extend below the 80% bioequivalence limits. CONCLUSION: Both combinations were well tolerated and had comparable pharmacokinetic profiles; differences are unlikely to be clinically relevant. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-009-0656-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.