Cargando…
Spine imaging after lumbar disc replacement: pitfalls and current recommendations
BACKGROUND: Most lumbar artificial discs are still composed of stainless steel alloys, which prevents adequate postoperative diagnostic imaging of the operated region when using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thus patients with postoperative radicular symptoms or claudication after stainless stee...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2716308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19619332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-3-15 |
_version_ | 1782169801044525056 |
---|---|
author | Robinson, Yohan Sandén, Bengt |
author_facet | Robinson, Yohan Sandén, Bengt |
author_sort | Robinson, Yohan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most lumbar artificial discs are still composed of stainless steel alloys, which prevents adequate postoperative diagnostic imaging of the operated region when using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thus patients with postoperative radicular symptoms or claudication after stainless steel implants often require alternative diagnostic procedures. METHODS: Possible complications of lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) are reviewed from the available literature and imaging recommendations given with regard to implant type. Two illustrative cases are presented in figures. RESULTS: Access-related complications, infections, implant wear, loosening or fracture, polyethylene inlay dislodgement, facet joint hypertrophy, central stenosis, and ankylosis of the operated segment can be visualised both in titanium and stainless steel implants, but require different imaging modalities due to magnetic artifacts in MRI. CONCLUSION: Alternative radiographic procedures should be considered when evaluating patients following TDR. Postoperative complications following lumbar TDR including spinal stenosis causing radiculopathy and implant loosening can be visualised by myelography and radionucleotide techniques as an adjunct to plain film radiographs. Even in the presence of massive stainless steel TDR implants lumbar radicular stenosis and implant loosening can be visualised if myelography and radionuclide techniques are applied. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2716308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27163082009-07-28 Spine imaging after lumbar disc replacement: pitfalls and current recommendations Robinson, Yohan Sandén, Bengt Patient Saf Surg Review BACKGROUND: Most lumbar artificial discs are still composed of stainless steel alloys, which prevents adequate postoperative diagnostic imaging of the operated region when using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thus patients with postoperative radicular symptoms or claudication after stainless steel implants often require alternative diagnostic procedures. METHODS: Possible complications of lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) are reviewed from the available literature and imaging recommendations given with regard to implant type. Two illustrative cases are presented in figures. RESULTS: Access-related complications, infections, implant wear, loosening or fracture, polyethylene inlay dislodgement, facet joint hypertrophy, central stenosis, and ankylosis of the operated segment can be visualised both in titanium and stainless steel implants, but require different imaging modalities due to magnetic artifacts in MRI. CONCLUSION: Alternative radiographic procedures should be considered when evaluating patients following TDR. Postoperative complications following lumbar TDR including spinal stenosis causing radiculopathy and implant loosening can be visualised by myelography and radionucleotide techniques as an adjunct to plain film radiographs. Even in the presence of massive stainless steel TDR implants lumbar radicular stenosis and implant loosening can be visualised if myelography and radionuclide techniques are applied. BioMed Central 2009-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2716308/ /pubmed/19619332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-3-15 Text en Copyright © 2009 Robinson and Sandén; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Robinson, Yohan Sandén, Bengt Spine imaging after lumbar disc replacement: pitfalls and current recommendations |
title | Spine imaging after lumbar disc replacement: pitfalls and current recommendations |
title_full | Spine imaging after lumbar disc replacement: pitfalls and current recommendations |
title_fullStr | Spine imaging after lumbar disc replacement: pitfalls and current recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed | Spine imaging after lumbar disc replacement: pitfalls and current recommendations |
title_short | Spine imaging after lumbar disc replacement: pitfalls and current recommendations |
title_sort | spine imaging after lumbar disc replacement: pitfalls and current recommendations |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2716308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19619332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-3-15 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robinsonyohan spineimagingafterlumbardiscreplacementpitfallsandcurrentrecommendations AT sandenbengt spineimagingafterlumbardiscreplacementpitfallsandcurrentrecommendations |