Cargando…

Patient experiences and health system responsiveness in South Africa

BACKGROUND: Patients' views are being given more and more importance in policy-making. Understanding populations' perceptions of quality of care is critical to developing measures to increase the utilization of primary health care services. Using the data from the South African World Healt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Peltzer, Karl
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2716320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19602290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-117
_version_ 1782169803873583104
author Peltzer, Karl
author_facet Peltzer, Karl
author_sort Peltzer, Karl
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients' views are being given more and more importance in policy-making. Understanding populations' perceptions of quality of care is critical to developing measures to increase the utilization of primary health care services. Using the data from the South African World Health Survey (WHS), the current study aims to evaluate the degree of health care service responsiveness (both out-patient and in-patient) and comparing experiences of individuals who used public and private services in South Africa. METHODS: A population-based survey of 2352 participants (1116 men and 1236 women) was conducted in South Africa in 2003, the WHS – as part of a World Health Organization (WHO) project focused on health system performance assessment in member countries. RESULTS: Health care utilization was among those who attended in-patient care 72.2% attended a public and 24.3% a private facility, and of those who attended out-patient care 58.7% attended a public and 35.7% a private facility. Major components identified for out-patient care responsiveness in this survey were highly correlated with health care access, communication and autonomy, secondarily to dignity, confidentiality and quality of basic amenities, and thirdly to health problem solution. The degree of responsiveness with publicly provided care was in this study significantly lower than in private health care. Overall patient non-responsiveness for the public out-patient service was 16.8% and 3.2% for private care. Discrimination was also one of the principal reasons for non-responsiveness in all aspects of provided health care. CONCLUSION: Health care access, communication, autonomy, and discriminatory experiences were identified as priority areas for actions to improve responsiveness of health care services in South Africa.
format Text
id pubmed-2716320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27163202009-07-28 Patient experiences and health system responsiveness in South Africa Peltzer, Karl BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients' views are being given more and more importance in policy-making. Understanding populations' perceptions of quality of care is critical to developing measures to increase the utilization of primary health care services. Using the data from the South African World Health Survey (WHS), the current study aims to evaluate the degree of health care service responsiveness (both out-patient and in-patient) and comparing experiences of individuals who used public and private services in South Africa. METHODS: A population-based survey of 2352 participants (1116 men and 1236 women) was conducted in South Africa in 2003, the WHS – as part of a World Health Organization (WHO) project focused on health system performance assessment in member countries. RESULTS: Health care utilization was among those who attended in-patient care 72.2% attended a public and 24.3% a private facility, and of those who attended out-patient care 58.7% attended a public and 35.7% a private facility. Major components identified for out-patient care responsiveness in this survey were highly correlated with health care access, communication and autonomy, secondarily to dignity, confidentiality and quality of basic amenities, and thirdly to health problem solution. The degree of responsiveness with publicly provided care was in this study significantly lower than in private health care. Overall patient non-responsiveness for the public out-patient service was 16.8% and 3.2% for private care. Discrimination was also one of the principal reasons for non-responsiveness in all aspects of provided health care. CONCLUSION: Health care access, communication, autonomy, and discriminatory experiences were identified as priority areas for actions to improve responsiveness of health care services in South Africa. BioMed Central 2009-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2716320/ /pubmed/19602290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-117 Text en Copyright © 2009 Peltzer; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peltzer, Karl
Patient experiences and health system responsiveness in South Africa
title Patient experiences and health system responsiveness in South Africa
title_full Patient experiences and health system responsiveness in South Africa
title_fullStr Patient experiences and health system responsiveness in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Patient experiences and health system responsiveness in South Africa
title_short Patient experiences and health system responsiveness in South Africa
title_sort patient experiences and health system responsiveness in south africa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2716320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19602290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-117
work_keys_str_mv AT peltzerkarl patientexperiencesandhealthsystemresponsivenessinsouthafrica