Cargando…

Modelling dominance in a flexible intercross analysis

BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper is to develop a flexible model for analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTL) in outbred line crosses, which includes both additive and dominance effects. Our flexible intercross analysis (FIA) model accounts for QTL that are not fixed within founder lines and is bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rönnegård, Lars, Besnier, Francois, Carlborg, Örjan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2716366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19558715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-10-30
_version_ 1782169814707470336
author Rönnegård, Lars
Besnier, Francois
Carlborg, Örjan
author_facet Rönnegård, Lars
Besnier, Francois
Carlborg, Örjan
author_sort Rönnegård, Lars
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper is to develop a flexible model for analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTL) in outbred line crosses, which includes both additive and dominance effects. Our flexible intercross analysis (FIA) model accounts for QTL that are not fixed within founder lines and is based on the variance component framework. Genome scans with FIA are performed using a score statistic, which does not require variance component estimation. RESULTS: Simulations of a pedigree with 800 F(2 )individuals showed that the power of FIA including both additive and dominance effects was almost 50% for a QTL with equal allele frequencies in both lines with complete dominance and a moderate effect, whereas the power of a traditional regression model was equal to the chosen significance value of 5%. The power of FIA without dominance effects included in the model was close to those obtained for FIA with dominance for all simulated cases except for QTL with overdominant effects. A genome-wide linkage analysis of experimental data from an F(2 )intercross between Red Jungle Fowl and White Leghorn was performed with both additive and dominance effects included in FIA. The score values for chicken body weight at 200 days of age were similar to those obtained in FIA analysis without dominance. CONCLUSION: We have extended FIA to include QTL dominance effects. The power of FIA was superior, or similar, to standard regression methods for QTL effects with dominance. The difference in power for FIA with or without dominance is expected to be small as long as the QTL effects are not overdominant. We suggest that FIA with only additive effects should be the standard model to be used, especially since it is more computationally efficient.
format Text
id pubmed-2716366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27163662009-07-28 Modelling dominance in a flexible intercross analysis Rönnegård, Lars Besnier, Francois Carlborg, Örjan BMC Genet Methodology Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper is to develop a flexible model for analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTL) in outbred line crosses, which includes both additive and dominance effects. Our flexible intercross analysis (FIA) model accounts for QTL that are not fixed within founder lines and is based on the variance component framework. Genome scans with FIA are performed using a score statistic, which does not require variance component estimation. RESULTS: Simulations of a pedigree with 800 F(2 )individuals showed that the power of FIA including both additive and dominance effects was almost 50% for a QTL with equal allele frequencies in both lines with complete dominance and a moderate effect, whereas the power of a traditional regression model was equal to the chosen significance value of 5%. The power of FIA without dominance effects included in the model was close to those obtained for FIA with dominance for all simulated cases except for QTL with overdominant effects. A genome-wide linkage analysis of experimental data from an F(2 )intercross between Red Jungle Fowl and White Leghorn was performed with both additive and dominance effects included in FIA. The score values for chicken body weight at 200 days of age were similar to those obtained in FIA analysis without dominance. CONCLUSION: We have extended FIA to include QTL dominance effects. The power of FIA was superior, or similar, to standard regression methods for QTL effects with dominance. The difference in power for FIA with or without dominance is expected to be small as long as the QTL effects are not overdominant. We suggest that FIA with only additive effects should be the standard model to be used, especially since it is more computationally efficient. BioMed Central 2009-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2716366/ /pubmed/19558715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-10-30 Text en Copyright © 2009 Rönnegård et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Rönnegård, Lars
Besnier, Francois
Carlborg, Örjan
Modelling dominance in a flexible intercross analysis
title Modelling dominance in a flexible intercross analysis
title_full Modelling dominance in a flexible intercross analysis
title_fullStr Modelling dominance in a flexible intercross analysis
title_full_unstemmed Modelling dominance in a flexible intercross analysis
title_short Modelling dominance in a flexible intercross analysis
title_sort modelling dominance in a flexible intercross analysis
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2716366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19558715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-10-30
work_keys_str_mv AT ronnegardlars modellingdominanceinaflexibleintercrossanalysis
AT besnierfrancois modellingdominanceinaflexibleintercrossanalysis
AT carlborgorjan modellingdominanceinaflexibleintercrossanalysis