Cargando…

Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and echocardiography (echo) in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with emphasis on the analysis of left ventricular function and left...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nowosielski, Martha, Schocke, Michael, Mayr, Agnes, Pedarnig, Kathrin, Klug, Gert, Köhler, Almut, Bartel, Thomas, Müller, Silvana, Trieb, Thomas, Pachinger, Otmar, Metzler, Bernhard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19589148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-11-22
_version_ 1782169857762000896
author Nowosielski, Martha
Schocke, Michael
Mayr, Agnes
Pedarnig, Kathrin
Klug, Gert
Köhler, Almut
Bartel, Thomas
Müller, Silvana
Trieb, Thomas
Pachinger, Otmar
Metzler, Bernhard
author_facet Nowosielski, Martha
Schocke, Michael
Mayr, Agnes
Pedarnig, Kathrin
Klug, Gert
Köhler, Almut
Bartel, Thomas
Müller, Silvana
Trieb, Thomas
Pachinger, Otmar
Metzler, Bernhard
author_sort Nowosielski, Martha
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and echocardiography (echo) in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with emphasis on the analysis of left ventricular function and left ventricular wall motion characteristics. METHODS: We performed CMR and echo in 52 patients with first AMI shortly after primary angioplasty and four months thereafter. CMR included cine-MR and T1-weighted first-pass and late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences. Global ejection fraction (EF(CMR), %) and regional left ventricular function (systolic wall thickening %, [SWT]) were determined from cine-MR images. In echo the global left ventricular function (EF(echo), %) and regional wall motion abnormalities were determined. A segment in echo was scored as "infarcted" if it was visually > 50% hypokinetic. RESULTS: EF(echo )revealed a poor significant agreement with EF(CMR )at baseline (r: 0.326; p < 0.01) but higher correlation at follow-up (r: 0.479; p < 0.001). The number of infarcted segments in echocardiography correlated best with the number of segments which showed systolic wall thickening < 30% (r: 0.498; p < 0.001) at baseline and (r: 0.474; p < 0.001) at follow-up. Improvement of EF was detected in both CMR and echocardiography increasing from 44.2 ± 11.6% to 49.2 ± 11% (p < 0.001) by CMR and from 51.2 ± 8.1% to 54.5 ± 8.3% (p < 0.001) by echocardiography. CONCLUSION: Wall motion and EF by CMR and echocardiography correlate poorly in the acute stage of myocardial infarction. Correlation improves after four months. Systolic wall thickening by CMR < 30% indicates an infarcted segment with influence on the left ventricular function.
format Text
id pubmed-2717065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27170652009-07-29 Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction Nowosielski, Martha Schocke, Michael Mayr, Agnes Pedarnig, Kathrin Klug, Gert Köhler, Almut Bartel, Thomas Müller, Silvana Trieb, Thomas Pachinger, Otmar Metzler, Bernhard J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and echocardiography (echo) in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with emphasis on the analysis of left ventricular function and left ventricular wall motion characteristics. METHODS: We performed CMR and echo in 52 patients with first AMI shortly after primary angioplasty and four months thereafter. CMR included cine-MR and T1-weighted first-pass and late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences. Global ejection fraction (EF(CMR), %) and regional left ventricular function (systolic wall thickening %, [SWT]) were determined from cine-MR images. In echo the global left ventricular function (EF(echo), %) and regional wall motion abnormalities were determined. A segment in echo was scored as "infarcted" if it was visually > 50% hypokinetic. RESULTS: EF(echo )revealed a poor significant agreement with EF(CMR )at baseline (r: 0.326; p < 0.01) but higher correlation at follow-up (r: 0.479; p < 0.001). The number of infarcted segments in echocardiography correlated best with the number of segments which showed systolic wall thickening < 30% (r: 0.498; p < 0.001) at baseline and (r: 0.474; p < 0.001) at follow-up. Improvement of EF was detected in both CMR and echocardiography increasing from 44.2 ± 11.6% to 49.2 ± 11% (p < 0.001) by CMR and from 51.2 ± 8.1% to 54.5 ± 8.3% (p < 0.001) by echocardiography. CONCLUSION: Wall motion and EF by CMR and echocardiography correlate poorly in the acute stage of myocardial infarction. Correlation improves after four months. Systolic wall thickening by CMR < 30% indicates an infarcted segment with influence on the left ventricular function. BioMed Central 2009-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2717065/ /pubmed/19589148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-11-22 Text en Copyright © 2009 Nowosielski et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Nowosielski, Martha
Schocke, Michael
Mayr, Agnes
Pedarnig, Kathrin
Klug, Gert
Köhler, Almut
Bartel, Thomas
Müller, Silvana
Trieb, Thomas
Pachinger, Otmar
Metzler, Bernhard
Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction
title Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction
title_full Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction
title_fullStr Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction
title_short Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction
title_sort comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19589148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-11-22
work_keys_str_mv AT nowosielskimartha comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT schockemichael comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT mayragnes comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT pedarnigkathrin comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT kluggert comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT kohleralmut comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT bartelthomas comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT mullersilvana comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT triebthomas comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT pachingerotmar comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction
AT metzlerbernhard comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction