Cargando…
Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and echocardiography (echo) in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with emphasis on the analysis of left ventricular function and left...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19589148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-11-22 |
_version_ | 1782169857762000896 |
---|---|
author | Nowosielski, Martha Schocke, Michael Mayr, Agnes Pedarnig, Kathrin Klug, Gert Köhler, Almut Bartel, Thomas Müller, Silvana Trieb, Thomas Pachinger, Otmar Metzler, Bernhard |
author_facet | Nowosielski, Martha Schocke, Michael Mayr, Agnes Pedarnig, Kathrin Klug, Gert Köhler, Almut Bartel, Thomas Müller, Silvana Trieb, Thomas Pachinger, Otmar Metzler, Bernhard |
author_sort | Nowosielski, Martha |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and echocardiography (echo) in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with emphasis on the analysis of left ventricular function and left ventricular wall motion characteristics. METHODS: We performed CMR and echo in 52 patients with first AMI shortly after primary angioplasty and four months thereafter. CMR included cine-MR and T1-weighted first-pass and late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences. Global ejection fraction (EF(CMR), %) and regional left ventricular function (systolic wall thickening %, [SWT]) were determined from cine-MR images. In echo the global left ventricular function (EF(echo), %) and regional wall motion abnormalities were determined. A segment in echo was scored as "infarcted" if it was visually > 50% hypokinetic. RESULTS: EF(echo )revealed a poor significant agreement with EF(CMR )at baseline (r: 0.326; p < 0.01) but higher correlation at follow-up (r: 0.479; p < 0.001). The number of infarcted segments in echocardiography correlated best with the number of segments which showed systolic wall thickening < 30% (r: 0.498; p < 0.001) at baseline and (r: 0.474; p < 0.001) at follow-up. Improvement of EF was detected in both CMR and echocardiography increasing from 44.2 ± 11.6% to 49.2 ± 11% (p < 0.001) by CMR and from 51.2 ± 8.1% to 54.5 ± 8.3% (p < 0.001) by echocardiography. CONCLUSION: Wall motion and EF by CMR and echocardiography correlate poorly in the acute stage of myocardial infarction. Correlation improves after four months. Systolic wall thickening by CMR < 30% indicates an infarcted segment with influence on the left ventricular function. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2717065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27170652009-07-29 Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction Nowosielski, Martha Schocke, Michael Mayr, Agnes Pedarnig, Kathrin Klug, Gert Köhler, Almut Bartel, Thomas Müller, Silvana Trieb, Thomas Pachinger, Otmar Metzler, Bernhard J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and echocardiography (echo) in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with emphasis on the analysis of left ventricular function and left ventricular wall motion characteristics. METHODS: We performed CMR and echo in 52 patients with first AMI shortly after primary angioplasty and four months thereafter. CMR included cine-MR and T1-weighted first-pass and late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences. Global ejection fraction (EF(CMR), %) and regional left ventricular function (systolic wall thickening %, [SWT]) were determined from cine-MR images. In echo the global left ventricular function (EF(echo), %) and regional wall motion abnormalities were determined. A segment in echo was scored as "infarcted" if it was visually > 50% hypokinetic. RESULTS: EF(echo )revealed a poor significant agreement with EF(CMR )at baseline (r: 0.326; p < 0.01) but higher correlation at follow-up (r: 0.479; p < 0.001). The number of infarcted segments in echocardiography correlated best with the number of segments which showed systolic wall thickening < 30% (r: 0.498; p < 0.001) at baseline and (r: 0.474; p < 0.001) at follow-up. Improvement of EF was detected in both CMR and echocardiography increasing from 44.2 ± 11.6% to 49.2 ± 11% (p < 0.001) by CMR and from 51.2 ± 8.1% to 54.5 ± 8.3% (p < 0.001) by echocardiography. CONCLUSION: Wall motion and EF by CMR and echocardiography correlate poorly in the acute stage of myocardial infarction. Correlation improves after four months. Systolic wall thickening by CMR < 30% indicates an infarcted segment with influence on the left ventricular function. BioMed Central 2009-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2717065/ /pubmed/19589148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-11-22 Text en Copyright © 2009 Nowosielski et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Nowosielski, Martha Schocke, Michael Mayr, Agnes Pedarnig, Kathrin Klug, Gert Köhler, Almut Bartel, Thomas Müller, Silvana Trieb, Thomas Pachinger, Otmar Metzler, Bernhard Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction |
title | Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction |
title_full | Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction |
title_fullStr | Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction |
title_short | Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction |
title_sort | comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19589148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-11-22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nowosielskimartha comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction AT schockemichael comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction AT mayragnes comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction AT pedarnigkathrin comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction AT kluggert comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction AT kohleralmut comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction AT bartelthomas comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction AT mullersilvana comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction AT triebthomas comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction AT pachingerotmar comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction AT metzlerbernhard comparisonofwallthickeningandejectionfractionbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceandechocardiographyinacutemyocardialinfarction |