Cargando…
Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?
BACKGROUND: The knowledge and use of qualitative description as a qualitative research approach in health services research is limited. The aim of this article is to discuss the potential benefits of a qualitative descriptive approach, to identify its strengths and weaknesses and to provide examples...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19607668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52 |
_version_ | 1782169867534729216 |
---|---|
author | Neergaard, Mette Asbjoern Olesen, Frede Andersen, Rikke Sand Sondergaard, Jens |
author_facet | Neergaard, Mette Asbjoern Olesen, Frede Andersen, Rikke Sand Sondergaard, Jens |
author_sort | Neergaard, Mette Asbjoern |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The knowledge and use of qualitative description as a qualitative research approach in health services research is limited. The aim of this article is to discuss the potential benefits of a qualitative descriptive approach, to identify its strengths and weaknesses and to provide examples of use. DISCUSSION: Qualitative description is a useful qualitative method in much medical research if you keep the limitations of the approach in mind. It is especially relevant in mixed method research, in questionnaire development and in research projects aiming to gain firsthand knowledge of patients', relatives' or professionals' experiences with a particular topic. Another great advantage of the method is that it is suitable if time or resources are limited. SUMMARY: As a consequence of the growth in qualitative research in the health sciences, researchers sometimes feel obliged to designate their work as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography or a narrative study when in fact it is not. Qualitative description might be a useful alternative approach to consider. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2717117 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27171172009-07-29 Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? Neergaard, Mette Asbjoern Olesen, Frede Andersen, Rikke Sand Sondergaard, Jens BMC Med Res Methodol Debate BACKGROUND: The knowledge and use of qualitative description as a qualitative research approach in health services research is limited. The aim of this article is to discuss the potential benefits of a qualitative descriptive approach, to identify its strengths and weaknesses and to provide examples of use. DISCUSSION: Qualitative description is a useful qualitative method in much medical research if you keep the limitations of the approach in mind. It is especially relevant in mixed method research, in questionnaire development and in research projects aiming to gain firsthand knowledge of patients', relatives' or professionals' experiences with a particular topic. Another great advantage of the method is that it is suitable if time or resources are limited. SUMMARY: As a consequence of the growth in qualitative research in the health sciences, researchers sometimes feel obliged to designate their work as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography or a narrative study when in fact it is not. Qualitative description might be a useful alternative approach to consider. BioMed Central 2009-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2717117/ /pubmed/19607668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52 Text en Copyright ©2009 Neergaard et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Debate Neergaard, Mette Asbjoern Olesen, Frede Andersen, Rikke Sand Sondergaard, Jens Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? |
title | Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? |
title_full | Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? |
title_fullStr | Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? |
title_short | Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? |
title_sort | qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19607668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neergaardmetteasbjoern qualitativedescriptionthepoorcousinofhealthresearch AT olesenfrede qualitativedescriptionthepoorcousinofhealthresearch AT andersenrikkesand qualitativedescriptionthepoorcousinofhealthresearch AT sondergaardjens qualitativedescriptionthepoorcousinofhealthresearch |