Cargando…

Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?

BACKGROUND: The knowledge and use of qualitative description as a qualitative research approach in health services research is limited. The aim of this article is to discuss the potential benefits of a qualitative descriptive approach, to identify its strengths and weaknesses and to provide examples...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neergaard, Mette Asbjoern, Olesen, Frede, Andersen, Rikke Sand, Sondergaard, Jens
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19607668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52
_version_ 1782169867534729216
author Neergaard, Mette Asbjoern
Olesen, Frede
Andersen, Rikke Sand
Sondergaard, Jens
author_facet Neergaard, Mette Asbjoern
Olesen, Frede
Andersen, Rikke Sand
Sondergaard, Jens
author_sort Neergaard, Mette Asbjoern
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The knowledge and use of qualitative description as a qualitative research approach in health services research is limited. The aim of this article is to discuss the potential benefits of a qualitative descriptive approach, to identify its strengths and weaknesses and to provide examples of use. DISCUSSION: Qualitative description is a useful qualitative method in much medical research if you keep the limitations of the approach in mind. It is especially relevant in mixed method research, in questionnaire development and in research projects aiming to gain firsthand knowledge of patients', relatives' or professionals' experiences with a particular topic. Another great advantage of the method is that it is suitable if time or resources are limited. SUMMARY: As a consequence of the growth in qualitative research in the health sciences, researchers sometimes feel obliged to designate their work as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography or a narrative study when in fact it is not. Qualitative description might be a useful alternative approach to consider.
format Text
id pubmed-2717117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27171172009-07-29 Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? Neergaard, Mette Asbjoern Olesen, Frede Andersen, Rikke Sand Sondergaard, Jens BMC Med Res Methodol Debate BACKGROUND: The knowledge and use of qualitative description as a qualitative research approach in health services research is limited. The aim of this article is to discuss the potential benefits of a qualitative descriptive approach, to identify its strengths and weaknesses and to provide examples of use. DISCUSSION: Qualitative description is a useful qualitative method in much medical research if you keep the limitations of the approach in mind. It is especially relevant in mixed method research, in questionnaire development and in research projects aiming to gain firsthand knowledge of patients', relatives' or professionals' experiences with a particular topic. Another great advantage of the method is that it is suitable if time or resources are limited. SUMMARY: As a consequence of the growth in qualitative research in the health sciences, researchers sometimes feel obliged to designate their work as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography or a narrative study when in fact it is not. Qualitative description might be a useful alternative approach to consider. BioMed Central 2009-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2717117/ /pubmed/19607668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52 Text en Copyright ©2009 Neergaard et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debate
Neergaard, Mette Asbjoern
Olesen, Frede
Andersen, Rikke Sand
Sondergaard, Jens
Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?
title Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?
title_full Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?
title_fullStr Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?
title_short Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?
title_sort qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19607668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52
work_keys_str_mv AT neergaardmetteasbjoern qualitativedescriptionthepoorcousinofhealthresearch
AT olesenfrede qualitativedescriptionthepoorcousinofhealthresearch
AT andersenrikkesand qualitativedescriptionthepoorcousinofhealthresearch
AT sondergaardjens qualitativedescriptionthepoorcousinofhealthresearch