Cargando…
Comparative transcriptomics in the Triticeae
BACKGROUND: Barley and particularly wheat are two grass species of immense agricultural importance. In spite of polyploidization events within the latter, studies have shown that genotypically and phenotypically these species are very closely related and, indeed, fertile hybrids can be created by in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19558723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-285 |
_version_ | 1782169868734300160 |
---|---|
author | Schreiber, Andreas W Sutton, Tim Caldo, Rico A Kalashyan, Elena Lovell, Ben Mayo, Gwenda Muehlbauer, Gary J Druka, Arnis Waugh, Robbie Wise, Roger P Langridge, Peter Baumann, Ute |
author_facet | Schreiber, Andreas W Sutton, Tim Caldo, Rico A Kalashyan, Elena Lovell, Ben Mayo, Gwenda Muehlbauer, Gary J Druka, Arnis Waugh, Robbie Wise, Roger P Langridge, Peter Baumann, Ute |
author_sort | Schreiber, Andreas W |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Barley and particularly wheat are two grass species of immense agricultural importance. In spite of polyploidization events within the latter, studies have shown that genotypically and phenotypically these species are very closely related and, indeed, fertile hybrids can be created by interbreeding. The advent of two genome-scale Affymetrix GeneChips now allows studies of the comparison of their transcriptomes. RESULTS: We have used the Wheat GeneChip to create a "gene expression atlas" for the wheat transcriptome (cv. Chinese Spring). For this, we chose mRNA from a range of tissues and developmental stages closely mirroring a comparable study carried out for barley (cv. Morex) using the Barley1 GeneChip. This, together with large-scale clustering of the probesets from the two GeneChips into "homologous groups", has allowed us to perform a genomic-scale comparative study of expression patterns in these two species. We explore the influence of the polyploidy of wheat on the results obtained with the Wheat GeneChip and quantify the correlation between conservation in gene sequence and gene expression in wheat and barley. In addition, we show how the conservation of expression patterns can be used to elucidate, probeset by probeset, the reliability of the Wheat GeneChip. CONCLUSION: While there are many differences in expression on the level of individual genes and tissues, we demonstrate that the wheat and barley transcriptomes appear highly correlated. This finding is significant not only because given small evolutionary distance between the two species it is widely expected, but also because it demonstrates that it is possible to use the two GeneChips for comparative studies. This is the case even though their probeset composition reflects rather different design principles as well as, of course, the present incomplete knowledge of the gene content of the two species. We also show that, in general, the Wheat GeneChip is not able to distinguish contributions from individual homoeologs. Furthermore, the comparison between the two species leads us to conclude that the conservation of both gene sequence as well as gene expression is positively correlated with absolute expression levels, presumably reflecting increased selection pressure on genes coding for proteins present at high levels. In addition, the results indicate the presence of a correlation between sequence and expression conservation within the Triticeae. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2717122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27171222009-07-29 Comparative transcriptomics in the Triticeae Schreiber, Andreas W Sutton, Tim Caldo, Rico A Kalashyan, Elena Lovell, Ben Mayo, Gwenda Muehlbauer, Gary J Druka, Arnis Waugh, Robbie Wise, Roger P Langridge, Peter Baumann, Ute BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Barley and particularly wheat are two grass species of immense agricultural importance. In spite of polyploidization events within the latter, studies have shown that genotypically and phenotypically these species are very closely related and, indeed, fertile hybrids can be created by interbreeding. The advent of two genome-scale Affymetrix GeneChips now allows studies of the comparison of their transcriptomes. RESULTS: We have used the Wheat GeneChip to create a "gene expression atlas" for the wheat transcriptome (cv. Chinese Spring). For this, we chose mRNA from a range of tissues and developmental stages closely mirroring a comparable study carried out for barley (cv. Morex) using the Barley1 GeneChip. This, together with large-scale clustering of the probesets from the two GeneChips into "homologous groups", has allowed us to perform a genomic-scale comparative study of expression patterns in these two species. We explore the influence of the polyploidy of wheat on the results obtained with the Wheat GeneChip and quantify the correlation between conservation in gene sequence and gene expression in wheat and barley. In addition, we show how the conservation of expression patterns can be used to elucidate, probeset by probeset, the reliability of the Wheat GeneChip. CONCLUSION: While there are many differences in expression on the level of individual genes and tissues, we demonstrate that the wheat and barley transcriptomes appear highly correlated. This finding is significant not only because given small evolutionary distance between the two species it is widely expected, but also because it demonstrates that it is possible to use the two GeneChips for comparative studies. This is the case even though their probeset composition reflects rather different design principles as well as, of course, the present incomplete knowledge of the gene content of the two species. We also show that, in general, the Wheat GeneChip is not able to distinguish contributions from individual homoeologs. Furthermore, the comparison between the two species leads us to conclude that the conservation of both gene sequence as well as gene expression is positively correlated with absolute expression levels, presumably reflecting increased selection pressure on genes coding for proteins present at high levels. In addition, the results indicate the presence of a correlation between sequence and expression conservation within the Triticeae. BioMed Central 2009-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2717122/ /pubmed/19558723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-285 Text en Copyright © 2009 Schreiber et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schreiber, Andreas W Sutton, Tim Caldo, Rico A Kalashyan, Elena Lovell, Ben Mayo, Gwenda Muehlbauer, Gary J Druka, Arnis Waugh, Robbie Wise, Roger P Langridge, Peter Baumann, Ute Comparative transcriptomics in the Triticeae |
title | Comparative transcriptomics in the Triticeae |
title_full | Comparative transcriptomics in the Triticeae |
title_fullStr | Comparative transcriptomics in the Triticeae |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative transcriptomics in the Triticeae |
title_short | Comparative transcriptomics in the Triticeae |
title_sort | comparative transcriptomics in the triticeae |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19558723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schreiberandreasw comparativetranscriptomicsinthetriticeae AT suttontim comparativetranscriptomicsinthetriticeae AT caldoricoa comparativetranscriptomicsinthetriticeae AT kalashyanelena comparativetranscriptomicsinthetriticeae AT lovellben comparativetranscriptomicsinthetriticeae AT mayogwenda comparativetranscriptomicsinthetriticeae AT muehlbauergaryj comparativetranscriptomicsinthetriticeae AT drukaarnis comparativetranscriptomicsinthetriticeae AT waughrobbie comparativetranscriptomicsinthetriticeae AT wiserogerp comparativetranscriptomicsinthetriticeae AT langridgepeter comparativetranscriptomicsinthetriticeae AT baumannute comparativetranscriptomicsinthetriticeae |