Cargando…
Childhood Lead Poisoning: Conservative Estimates of the Social and Economic Benefits of Lead Hazard Control
BACKGROUND: This study is a cost–benefit analysis that quantifies the social and economic benefits to household lead paint hazard control compared with the investments needed to minimize exposure to these hazards. OBJECTIVES: This research updates estimates of elevated blood lead levels among a coho...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19654928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0800408 |
_version_ | 1782169874393464832 |
---|---|
author | Gould, Elise |
author_facet | Gould, Elise |
author_sort | Gould, Elise |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study is a cost–benefit analysis that quantifies the social and economic benefits to household lead paint hazard control compared with the investments needed to minimize exposure to these hazards. OBJECTIVES: This research updates estimates of elevated blood lead levels among a cohort of children ≤ 6 years of age and compiles recent research to determine a range of the costs of lead paint hazard control ($1–$11 billion) and the benefits of reduction attributed to each cohort for health care ($11–$53 billion), lifetime earnings ($165–$233 billion), tax revenue ($25–$35 billion), special education ($30–$146 million), attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder ($267 million), and the direct costs of crime ($1.7 billion). RESULTS: Each dollar invested in lead paint hazard control results in a return of $17–$221 or a net savings of $181–269 billion. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial returns to investing in lead hazard control, particularly targeted at early intervention in communities most likely at risk. Given the high societal costs of inaction, lead hazard control appears to be well worth the price. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2717145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27171452009-08-04 Childhood Lead Poisoning: Conservative Estimates of the Social and Economic Benefits of Lead Hazard Control Gould, Elise Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: This study is a cost–benefit analysis that quantifies the social and economic benefits to household lead paint hazard control compared with the investments needed to minimize exposure to these hazards. OBJECTIVES: This research updates estimates of elevated blood lead levels among a cohort of children ≤ 6 years of age and compiles recent research to determine a range of the costs of lead paint hazard control ($1–$11 billion) and the benefits of reduction attributed to each cohort for health care ($11–$53 billion), lifetime earnings ($165–$233 billion), tax revenue ($25–$35 billion), special education ($30–$146 million), attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder ($267 million), and the direct costs of crime ($1.7 billion). RESULTS: Each dollar invested in lead paint hazard control results in a return of $17–$221 or a net savings of $181–269 billion. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial returns to investing in lead hazard control, particularly targeted at early intervention in communities most likely at risk. Given the high societal costs of inaction, lead hazard control appears to be well worth the price. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2009-07 2009-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2717145/ /pubmed/19654928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0800408 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Research Gould, Elise Childhood Lead Poisoning: Conservative Estimates of the Social and Economic Benefits of Lead Hazard Control |
title | Childhood Lead Poisoning: Conservative Estimates of the Social and Economic Benefits of Lead Hazard Control |
title_full | Childhood Lead Poisoning: Conservative Estimates of the Social and Economic Benefits of Lead Hazard Control |
title_fullStr | Childhood Lead Poisoning: Conservative Estimates of the Social and Economic Benefits of Lead Hazard Control |
title_full_unstemmed | Childhood Lead Poisoning: Conservative Estimates of the Social and Economic Benefits of Lead Hazard Control |
title_short | Childhood Lead Poisoning: Conservative Estimates of the Social and Economic Benefits of Lead Hazard Control |
title_sort | childhood lead poisoning: conservative estimates of the social and economic benefits of lead hazard control |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19654928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0800408 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gouldelise childhoodleadpoisoningconservativeestimatesofthesocialandeconomicbenefitsofleadhazardcontrol |