Cargando…

Recruit the lung before titrating the right positive end-expiratory pressure to protect it

The optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients is still controversial and has gained renewed interest in the era of 'lung protective ventilation strategies'. Despite experimental evidence that higher levels of PEEP protect again...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suarez-Sipmann, Fernando, Bohm, Stephan H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19480645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7763
_version_ 1782169891053240320
author Suarez-Sipmann, Fernando
Bohm, Stephan H
author_facet Suarez-Sipmann, Fernando
Bohm, Stephan H
author_sort Suarez-Sipmann, Fernando
collection PubMed
description The optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients is still controversial and has gained renewed interest in the era of 'lung protective ventilation strategies'. Despite experimental evidence that higher levels of PEEP protect against ventilator-induced lung injury, recent clinical trials have failed to demonstrate clear survival benefits. The open-lung protective ventilation strategy combines lung recruitment maneuvers with a decremental PEEP trial aimed at finding the minimum level of PEEP that prevents the lung from collapsing. This approach to PEEP titration is more likely to exert its protective effects and is clearly different from the one used in previous clinical trials.
format Text
id pubmed-2717406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27174062010-05-06 Recruit the lung before titrating the right positive end-expiratory pressure to protect it Suarez-Sipmann, Fernando Bohm, Stephan H Crit Care Commentary The optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients is still controversial and has gained renewed interest in the era of 'lung protective ventilation strategies'. Despite experimental evidence that higher levels of PEEP protect against ventilator-induced lung injury, recent clinical trials have failed to demonstrate clear survival benefits. The open-lung protective ventilation strategy combines lung recruitment maneuvers with a decremental PEEP trial aimed at finding the minimum level of PEEP that prevents the lung from collapsing. This approach to PEEP titration is more likely to exert its protective effects and is clearly different from the one used in previous clinical trials. BioMed Central 2009 2009-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2717406/ /pubmed/19480645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7763 Text en Copyright © 2009 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Suarez-Sipmann, Fernando
Bohm, Stephan H
Recruit the lung before titrating the right positive end-expiratory pressure to protect it
title Recruit the lung before titrating the right positive end-expiratory pressure to protect it
title_full Recruit the lung before titrating the right positive end-expiratory pressure to protect it
title_fullStr Recruit the lung before titrating the right positive end-expiratory pressure to protect it
title_full_unstemmed Recruit the lung before titrating the right positive end-expiratory pressure to protect it
title_short Recruit the lung before titrating the right positive end-expiratory pressure to protect it
title_sort recruit the lung before titrating the right positive end-expiratory pressure to protect it
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19480645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7763
work_keys_str_mv AT suarezsipmannfernando recruitthelungbeforetitratingtherightpositiveendexpiratorypressuretoprotectit
AT bohmstephanh recruitthelungbeforetitratingtherightpositiveendexpiratorypressuretoprotectit