Cargando…

Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial

INTRODUCTION: Agitated delirium is common in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, and is often treated with haloperidol despite concerns about safety and efficacy. Use of conventional sedatives to control agitation can preclude extubation. Dexmedetomidine, a novel sedative and anxiolytic agen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reade, Michael C, O'Sullivan, Kim, Bates, Samantha, Goldsmith, Donna, Ainslie, William RSTJ, Bellomo, Rinaldo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19454032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7890
_version_ 1782169898541121536
author Reade, Michael C
O'Sullivan, Kim
Bates, Samantha
Goldsmith, Donna
Ainslie, William RSTJ
Bellomo, Rinaldo
author_facet Reade, Michael C
O'Sullivan, Kim
Bates, Samantha
Goldsmith, Donna
Ainslie, William RSTJ
Bellomo, Rinaldo
author_sort Reade, Michael C
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Agitated delirium is common in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, and is often treated with haloperidol despite concerns about safety and efficacy. Use of conventional sedatives to control agitation can preclude extubation. Dexmedetomidine, a novel sedative and anxiolytic agent, may have particular utility in these patients. We sought to compare the efficacy of haloperidol and dexmedetomidine in facilitating extubation. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, open-label, parallel-groups pilot trial in the medical and surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. Twenty patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in whom extubation was not possible solely because of agitated delirium were randomised to receive an infusion of either haloperidol 0.5 to 2 mg/hour or dexmedetomidine 0.2 to 0.7 μg/kg/hr, with or without loading doses of 2.5 mg haloperidol or 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine, according to clinician preference. RESULTS: Dexmedetomidine significantly shortened median time to extubation from 42.5 (IQR 23.2 to 117.8) to 19.9 (IQR 7.3 to 24) hours (P = 0.016). Dexmedetomidine significantly decreased ICU length of stay, from 6.5 (IQR 4 to 9) to 1.5 (IQR 1 to 3) days (P = 0.004) after study drug commencement. Of patients who required ongoing propofol sedation, the proportion of time propofol was required was halved in those who received dexmedetomidine (79.5% (95% CI 61.8 to 97.2%) vs. 41.2% (95% CI 0 to 88.1%) of the time intubated; P = 0.05). No patients were reintubated; three receiving haloperidol could not be successfully extubated and underwent tracheostomy. One patient prematurely discontinued haloperidol due to QTc interval prolongation. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary pilot study, we found dexmedetomidine a promising agent for the treatment of ICU-associated delirious agitation, and we suggest this warrants further testing in a definitive double-blind multi-centre trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00505804
format Text
id pubmed-2717438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27174382009-07-29 Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial Reade, Michael C O'Sullivan, Kim Bates, Samantha Goldsmith, Donna Ainslie, William RSTJ Bellomo, Rinaldo Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Agitated delirium is common in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, and is often treated with haloperidol despite concerns about safety and efficacy. Use of conventional sedatives to control agitation can preclude extubation. Dexmedetomidine, a novel sedative and anxiolytic agent, may have particular utility in these patients. We sought to compare the efficacy of haloperidol and dexmedetomidine in facilitating extubation. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, open-label, parallel-groups pilot trial in the medical and surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. Twenty patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in whom extubation was not possible solely because of agitated delirium were randomised to receive an infusion of either haloperidol 0.5 to 2 mg/hour or dexmedetomidine 0.2 to 0.7 μg/kg/hr, with or without loading doses of 2.5 mg haloperidol or 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine, according to clinician preference. RESULTS: Dexmedetomidine significantly shortened median time to extubation from 42.5 (IQR 23.2 to 117.8) to 19.9 (IQR 7.3 to 24) hours (P = 0.016). Dexmedetomidine significantly decreased ICU length of stay, from 6.5 (IQR 4 to 9) to 1.5 (IQR 1 to 3) days (P = 0.004) after study drug commencement. Of patients who required ongoing propofol sedation, the proportion of time propofol was required was halved in those who received dexmedetomidine (79.5% (95% CI 61.8 to 97.2%) vs. 41.2% (95% CI 0 to 88.1%) of the time intubated; P = 0.05). No patients were reintubated; three receiving haloperidol could not be successfully extubated and underwent tracheostomy. One patient prematurely discontinued haloperidol due to QTc interval prolongation. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary pilot study, we found dexmedetomidine a promising agent for the treatment of ICU-associated delirious agitation, and we suggest this warrants further testing in a definitive double-blind multi-centre trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00505804 BioMed Central 2009 2009-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2717438/ /pubmed/19454032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7890 Text en Copyright © 2009 Reade et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Reade, Michael C
O'Sullivan, Kim
Bates, Samantha
Goldsmith, Donna
Ainslie, William RSTJ
Bellomo, Rinaldo
Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial
title Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial
title_full Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial
title_fullStr Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial
title_full_unstemmed Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial
title_short Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial
title_sort dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19454032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7890
work_keys_str_mv AT reademichaelc dexmedetomidinevshaloperidolindeliriousagitatedintubatedpatientsarandomisedopenlabeltrial
AT osullivankim dexmedetomidinevshaloperidolindeliriousagitatedintubatedpatientsarandomisedopenlabeltrial
AT batessamantha dexmedetomidinevshaloperidolindeliriousagitatedintubatedpatientsarandomisedopenlabeltrial
AT goldsmithdonna dexmedetomidinevshaloperidolindeliriousagitatedintubatedpatientsarandomisedopenlabeltrial
AT ainsliewilliamrstj dexmedetomidinevshaloperidolindeliriousagitatedintubatedpatientsarandomisedopenlabeltrial
AT bellomorinaldo dexmedetomidinevshaloperidolindeliriousagitatedintubatedpatientsarandomisedopenlabeltrial