Cargando…
Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial
INTRODUCTION: Agitated delirium is common in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, and is often treated with haloperidol despite concerns about safety and efficacy. Use of conventional sedatives to control agitation can preclude extubation. Dexmedetomidine, a novel sedative and anxiolytic agen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19454032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7890 |
_version_ | 1782169898541121536 |
---|---|
author | Reade, Michael C O'Sullivan, Kim Bates, Samantha Goldsmith, Donna Ainslie, William RSTJ Bellomo, Rinaldo |
author_facet | Reade, Michael C O'Sullivan, Kim Bates, Samantha Goldsmith, Donna Ainslie, William RSTJ Bellomo, Rinaldo |
author_sort | Reade, Michael C |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Agitated delirium is common in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, and is often treated with haloperidol despite concerns about safety and efficacy. Use of conventional sedatives to control agitation can preclude extubation. Dexmedetomidine, a novel sedative and anxiolytic agent, may have particular utility in these patients. We sought to compare the efficacy of haloperidol and dexmedetomidine in facilitating extubation. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, open-label, parallel-groups pilot trial in the medical and surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. Twenty patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in whom extubation was not possible solely because of agitated delirium were randomised to receive an infusion of either haloperidol 0.5 to 2 mg/hour or dexmedetomidine 0.2 to 0.7 μg/kg/hr, with or without loading doses of 2.5 mg haloperidol or 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine, according to clinician preference. RESULTS: Dexmedetomidine significantly shortened median time to extubation from 42.5 (IQR 23.2 to 117.8) to 19.9 (IQR 7.3 to 24) hours (P = 0.016). Dexmedetomidine significantly decreased ICU length of stay, from 6.5 (IQR 4 to 9) to 1.5 (IQR 1 to 3) days (P = 0.004) after study drug commencement. Of patients who required ongoing propofol sedation, the proportion of time propofol was required was halved in those who received dexmedetomidine (79.5% (95% CI 61.8 to 97.2%) vs. 41.2% (95% CI 0 to 88.1%) of the time intubated; P = 0.05). No patients were reintubated; three receiving haloperidol could not be successfully extubated and underwent tracheostomy. One patient prematurely discontinued haloperidol due to QTc interval prolongation. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary pilot study, we found dexmedetomidine a promising agent for the treatment of ICU-associated delirious agitation, and we suggest this warrants further testing in a definitive double-blind multi-centre trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00505804 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2717438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27174382009-07-29 Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial Reade, Michael C O'Sullivan, Kim Bates, Samantha Goldsmith, Donna Ainslie, William RSTJ Bellomo, Rinaldo Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Agitated delirium is common in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, and is often treated with haloperidol despite concerns about safety and efficacy. Use of conventional sedatives to control agitation can preclude extubation. Dexmedetomidine, a novel sedative and anxiolytic agent, may have particular utility in these patients. We sought to compare the efficacy of haloperidol and dexmedetomidine in facilitating extubation. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, open-label, parallel-groups pilot trial in the medical and surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. Twenty patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in whom extubation was not possible solely because of agitated delirium were randomised to receive an infusion of either haloperidol 0.5 to 2 mg/hour or dexmedetomidine 0.2 to 0.7 μg/kg/hr, with or without loading doses of 2.5 mg haloperidol or 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine, according to clinician preference. RESULTS: Dexmedetomidine significantly shortened median time to extubation from 42.5 (IQR 23.2 to 117.8) to 19.9 (IQR 7.3 to 24) hours (P = 0.016). Dexmedetomidine significantly decreased ICU length of stay, from 6.5 (IQR 4 to 9) to 1.5 (IQR 1 to 3) days (P = 0.004) after study drug commencement. Of patients who required ongoing propofol sedation, the proportion of time propofol was required was halved in those who received dexmedetomidine (79.5% (95% CI 61.8 to 97.2%) vs. 41.2% (95% CI 0 to 88.1%) of the time intubated; P = 0.05). No patients were reintubated; three receiving haloperidol could not be successfully extubated and underwent tracheostomy. One patient prematurely discontinued haloperidol due to QTc interval prolongation. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary pilot study, we found dexmedetomidine a promising agent for the treatment of ICU-associated delirious agitation, and we suggest this warrants further testing in a definitive double-blind multi-centre trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00505804 BioMed Central 2009 2009-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2717438/ /pubmed/19454032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7890 Text en Copyright © 2009 Reade et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Reade, Michael C O'Sullivan, Kim Bates, Samantha Goldsmith, Donna Ainslie, William RSTJ Bellomo, Rinaldo Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial |
title | Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial |
title_full | Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial |
title_fullStr | Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial |
title_short | Dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial |
title_sort | dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol in delirious, agitated, intubated patients: a randomised open-label trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19454032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7890 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reademichaelc dexmedetomidinevshaloperidolindeliriousagitatedintubatedpatientsarandomisedopenlabeltrial AT osullivankim dexmedetomidinevshaloperidolindeliriousagitatedintubatedpatientsarandomisedopenlabeltrial AT batessamantha dexmedetomidinevshaloperidolindeliriousagitatedintubatedpatientsarandomisedopenlabeltrial AT goldsmithdonna dexmedetomidinevshaloperidolindeliriousagitatedintubatedpatientsarandomisedopenlabeltrial AT ainsliewilliamrstj dexmedetomidinevshaloperidolindeliriousagitatedintubatedpatientsarandomisedopenlabeltrial AT bellomorinaldo dexmedetomidinevshaloperidolindeliriousagitatedintubatedpatientsarandomisedopenlabeltrial |