Validation of continuous cardiac output technologies: consensus still awaited

An ability to measure cardiac output in a continuous and non-invasive fashion is eagerly awaited in the field of intensive care practice. Modern technologies purport to be able to do this, but the design of studies that validate the manufacturers' claims is by no means straightforward. It is im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cecconi, Maurizio, Rhodes, Andrew
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Commentary
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19591658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7909
_version_ 1782169902587576320
author Cecconi, Maurizio
Rhodes, Andrew
author_facet Cecconi, Maurizio
Rhodes, Andrew
author_sort Cecconi, Maurizio
collection PubMed
description An ability to measure cardiac output in a continuous and non-invasive fashion is eagerly awaited in the field of intensive care practice. Modern technologies purport to be able to do this, but the design of studies that validate the manufacturers' claims is by no means straightforward. It is imperative that the scientific community describes and agrees on a set of principles that will enable us to design and then review and assess future validation studies, so that new technologies can be fairly assessed and compared with their competitors.
format Text
id pubmed-2717455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27174552010-06-26 Validation of continuous cardiac output technologies: consensus still awaited Cecconi, Maurizio Rhodes, Andrew Crit Care Commentary An ability to measure cardiac output in a continuous and non-invasive fashion is eagerly awaited in the field of intensive care practice. Modern technologies purport to be able to do this, but the design of studies that validate the manufacturers' claims is by no means straightforward. It is imperative that the scientific community describes and agrees on a set of principles that will enable us to design and then review and assess future validation studies, so that new technologies can be fairly assessed and compared with their competitors. BioMed Central 2009 2009-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2717455/ /pubmed/19591658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7909 Text en Copyright © 2009 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Cecconi, Maurizio
Rhodes, Andrew
Validation of continuous cardiac output technologies: consensus still awaited
title Validation of continuous cardiac output technologies: consensus still awaited
title_full Validation of continuous cardiac output technologies: consensus still awaited
title_fullStr Validation of continuous cardiac output technologies: consensus still awaited
title_full_unstemmed Validation of continuous cardiac output technologies: consensus still awaited
title_short Validation of continuous cardiac output technologies: consensus still awaited
title_sort validation of continuous cardiac output technologies: consensus still awaited
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19591658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc7909
work_keys_str_mv AT cecconimaurizio validationofcontinuouscardiacoutputtechnologiesconsensusstillawaited
AT rhodesandrew validationofcontinuouscardiacoutputtechnologiesconsensusstillawaited

Ejemplares similares