Cargando…

The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Differentiation of Retinal Detachment from Vitreous Membrane

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical utility of contrast-enhanced color Doppler US in the differentiation of retinal detachment (RD) from vitreous membrane (VM) with that of various conventional US modalities, and to analyze the enhancement patterns in cases showing an enhancement effect. MATERIALS AN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Sang-Suk, Chang, Seung-Kook, Yoon, Jung-Hee, Lee, Young-Joon
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Radiological Society 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2718121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11754326
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2001.2.4.197
_version_ 1782169968939368448
author Han, Sang-Suk
Chang, Seung-Kook
Yoon, Jung-Hee
Lee, Young-Joon
author_facet Han, Sang-Suk
Chang, Seung-Kook
Yoon, Jung-Hee
Lee, Young-Joon
author_sort Han, Sang-Suk
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical utility of contrast-enhanced color Doppler US in the differentiation of retinal detachment (RD) from vitreous membrane (VM) with that of various conventional US modalities, and to analyze the enhancement patterns in cases showing an enhancement effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 32 eyes examined over a recent two-year period, RD (n=14) and VM (n=18) were confirmed by surgery (n=28) or clinical follow-up (n=4). In all cases, gray-scale, color Doppler, and power Doppler US were performed prior to contrast injection, and after the intravenous injection of Levovist (Schering, Berlin) by hand for 30 seconds at a dose of 2.5 g and a concentration of 300 mg/mL via an antecubital vein, contrast-enhanced color Doppler US was performed. At Doppler US, the diagnostic criterion for RD and VM was whether or not color signals were visualized in membranous structures. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy was 78% at gray-scale US, 81% at color Doppler US, 59% at power Doppler US, and 97% at contrast-enhanced color Doppler US. The sensitivity of color Doppler US to color signals in RD increased from 57% to 93% after contrast enhancement. The enhancement patterns observed were signal accentuation (n=3), signal extension (n=2), signal addition (n=3), and new signal visualization (n=5). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced color Doppler US was the most accurate US modality for differentiating RD from VM, showing a significantly increased signal detection rate in RD.
format Text
id pubmed-2718121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher The Korean Radiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27181212009-07-30 The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Differentiation of Retinal Detachment from Vitreous Membrane Han, Sang-Suk Chang, Seung-Kook Yoon, Jung-Hee Lee, Young-Joon Korean J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical utility of contrast-enhanced color Doppler US in the differentiation of retinal detachment (RD) from vitreous membrane (VM) with that of various conventional US modalities, and to analyze the enhancement patterns in cases showing an enhancement effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 32 eyes examined over a recent two-year period, RD (n=14) and VM (n=18) were confirmed by surgery (n=28) or clinical follow-up (n=4). In all cases, gray-scale, color Doppler, and power Doppler US were performed prior to contrast injection, and after the intravenous injection of Levovist (Schering, Berlin) by hand for 30 seconds at a dose of 2.5 g and a concentration of 300 mg/mL via an antecubital vein, contrast-enhanced color Doppler US was performed. At Doppler US, the diagnostic criterion for RD and VM was whether or not color signals were visualized in membranous structures. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy was 78% at gray-scale US, 81% at color Doppler US, 59% at power Doppler US, and 97% at contrast-enhanced color Doppler US. The sensitivity of color Doppler US to color signals in RD increased from 57% to 93% after contrast enhancement. The enhancement patterns observed were signal accentuation (n=3), signal extension (n=2), signal addition (n=3), and new signal visualization (n=5). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced color Doppler US was the most accurate US modality for differentiating RD from VM, showing a significantly increased signal detection rate in RD. The Korean Radiological Society 2001 2001-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2718121/ /pubmed/11754326 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2001.2.4.197 Text en Copyright © 2001 The Korean Radiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Han, Sang-Suk
Chang, Seung-Kook
Yoon, Jung-Hee
Lee, Young-Joon
The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Differentiation of Retinal Detachment from Vitreous Membrane
title The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Differentiation of Retinal Detachment from Vitreous Membrane
title_full The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Differentiation of Retinal Detachment from Vitreous Membrane
title_fullStr The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Differentiation of Retinal Detachment from Vitreous Membrane
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Differentiation of Retinal Detachment from Vitreous Membrane
title_short The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Differentiation of Retinal Detachment from Vitreous Membrane
title_sort use of contrast-enhanced color doppler ultrasound in the differentiation of retinal detachment from vitreous membrane
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2718121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11754326
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2001.2.4.197
work_keys_str_mv AT hansangsuk theuseofcontrastenhancedcolordopplerultrasoundinthedifferentiationofretinaldetachmentfromvitreousmembrane
AT changseungkook theuseofcontrastenhancedcolordopplerultrasoundinthedifferentiationofretinaldetachmentfromvitreousmembrane
AT yoonjunghee theuseofcontrastenhancedcolordopplerultrasoundinthedifferentiationofretinaldetachmentfromvitreousmembrane
AT leeyoungjoon theuseofcontrastenhancedcolordopplerultrasoundinthedifferentiationofretinaldetachmentfromvitreousmembrane
AT hansangsuk useofcontrastenhancedcolordopplerultrasoundinthedifferentiationofretinaldetachmentfromvitreousmembrane
AT changseungkook useofcontrastenhancedcolordopplerultrasoundinthedifferentiationofretinaldetachmentfromvitreousmembrane
AT yoonjunghee useofcontrastenhancedcolordopplerultrasoundinthedifferentiationofretinaldetachmentfromvitreousmembrane
AT leeyoungjoon useofcontrastenhancedcolordopplerultrasoundinthedifferentiationofretinaldetachmentfromvitreousmembrane