Cargando…

The Optimization of Scan Timing for Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal scan timing for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and to evaluate a new timing method based on the arteriovenous circulation time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiographic examinations were performed mainl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jongmin J., Tirman, Phillip J., Chang, Yongmin, Ryeom, Hun-Kyu, Lee, Sang-Kwon, Kim, Yong-Sun, Kang, Duk-Sik
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Radiological Society 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2718183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11752945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2000.1.3.142
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal scan timing for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and to evaluate a new timing method based on the arteriovenous circulation time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiographic examinations were performed mainly in the extremities. A 1.5T scanner with a 3-D turbo-FLASH sequence was used, and during each study, two consecutive arterial phases and one venous phase were acquired. Scan delay time was calculated from the time-intensity curve by the traditional (n = 48) and/or the new (n = 41) method. This latter was based on arteriovenous circulation time rather than peak arterial enhancement time, as used in the traditional method. The numbers of first-phase images showing a properly enhanced arterial phase were compared between the two methods. RESULTS: Mean scan delay time was 5.4 sec longer with the new method than with the traditional. Properly enhanced first-phase images were found in 65% of cases (31/48) using the traditional timing method, and 95% (39/41) using the new method. When cases in which there was mismatch between the target vessel and the time-intensity curve acquisition site are excluded, erroneous acquisition occurred in seven cases with the traditional method, but in none with the new method. CONCLUSION: The calculation of scan delay time on the basis of arteriovenous circulation time provides better timing for arterial phase acquisition than the traditional method.