Cargando…

Micro-expression recognition training in medical students: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Patients provide emotional cues during consultations which may be verbal or non-verbal. Many studies focus on patient verbal cues as predictors of physicians' ability to recognize and address patient needs but this project focused on non-verbal cues in the form of facial micro-expre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Endres, Jennifer, Laidlaw, Anita
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2718872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19619307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-47
_version_ 1782170026181132288
author Endres, Jennifer
Laidlaw, Anita
author_facet Endres, Jennifer
Laidlaw, Anita
author_sort Endres, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients provide emotional cues during consultations which may be verbal or non-verbal. Many studies focus on patient verbal cues as predictors of physicians' ability to recognize and address patient needs but this project focused on non-verbal cues in the form of facial micro-expressions. This pilot study investigated first year medical students' (n = 75) identified as being either good or poor communicators abilities to detect emotional micro-expressions before and after training using the Micro Expression Training Tool (METT) . METHODS: The sample consisted of 24 first year medical students, 9 were from the lowest performance quartile in a communication skills OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Exam) station and 15 were from the highest performance quartile. These students completed the METT individually, recording pre- and post-assessment scores. Students were also invited to provide their views on the training. RESULTS: No difference in pre-assessment scores was found between the lowest and highest quartile groups (P = 0.797). After training, students in the high quartile showed significant improvement in the recognition of facial micro-expressions (P = 0.014). The lowest quartile students showed no improvement (P = 0.799). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this pilot study showed there was no difference between the ability of medical undergraduate students assessed as being good communicators and those assessed as poor communicators to identify facial micro-expressions. But, the study did highlight that those students demonstrating good general clinical communication benefited from the training aspect of the METT, whereas low performing students did not gain. Why this should be the case is not clear and further investigation should be carried out to determine why lowest quartile students did not benefit.
format Text
id pubmed-2718872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27188722009-07-31 Micro-expression recognition training in medical students: a pilot study Endres, Jennifer Laidlaw, Anita BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients provide emotional cues during consultations which may be verbal or non-verbal. Many studies focus on patient verbal cues as predictors of physicians' ability to recognize and address patient needs but this project focused on non-verbal cues in the form of facial micro-expressions. This pilot study investigated first year medical students' (n = 75) identified as being either good or poor communicators abilities to detect emotional micro-expressions before and after training using the Micro Expression Training Tool (METT) . METHODS: The sample consisted of 24 first year medical students, 9 were from the lowest performance quartile in a communication skills OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Exam) station and 15 were from the highest performance quartile. These students completed the METT individually, recording pre- and post-assessment scores. Students were also invited to provide their views on the training. RESULTS: No difference in pre-assessment scores was found between the lowest and highest quartile groups (P = 0.797). After training, students in the high quartile showed significant improvement in the recognition of facial micro-expressions (P = 0.014). The lowest quartile students showed no improvement (P = 0.799). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this pilot study showed there was no difference between the ability of medical undergraduate students assessed as being good communicators and those assessed as poor communicators to identify facial micro-expressions. But, the study did highlight that those students demonstrating good general clinical communication benefited from the training aspect of the METT, whereas low performing students did not gain. Why this should be the case is not clear and further investigation should be carried out to determine why lowest quartile students did not benefit. BioMed Central 2009-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2718872/ /pubmed/19619307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-47 Text en Copyright © 2009 Endres and Laidlaw; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Endres, Jennifer
Laidlaw, Anita
Micro-expression recognition training in medical students: a pilot study
title Micro-expression recognition training in medical students: a pilot study
title_full Micro-expression recognition training in medical students: a pilot study
title_fullStr Micro-expression recognition training in medical students: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Micro-expression recognition training in medical students: a pilot study
title_short Micro-expression recognition training in medical students: a pilot study
title_sort micro-expression recognition training in medical students: a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2718872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19619307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-47
work_keys_str_mv AT endresjennifer microexpressionrecognitiontraininginmedicalstudentsapilotstudy
AT laidlawanita microexpressionrecognitiontraininginmedicalstudentsapilotstudy