Cargando…
Comparison Between Open Procedure and Tubular Retractor Assisted Procedure for Cervical Radiculopathy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study
Posterior cervical foraminotomy is an effective surgical technique for the treatment of radicular pain caused by foraminal stenosis or posterolateral herniated discs. The present study was performed to compare the clinical parameters and surgical outcomes of open foraminotomy/discectomy (OF/OFD) and...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2719221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19654947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2009.24.4.649 |
_version_ | 1782170064578936832 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Young-Baeg |
author_facet | Kim, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Young-Baeg |
author_sort | Kim, Kyoung-Tae |
collection | PubMed |
description | Posterior cervical foraminotomy is an effective surgical technique for the treatment of radicular pain caused by foraminal stenosis or posterolateral herniated discs. The present study was performed to compare the clinical parameters and surgical outcomes of open foraminotomy/discectomy (OF/OFD) and tubular retractor assisted foraminotomy/discectomy (TAF/TAFD) in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. A total of 41 patients were divided into two groups: 19 patients in Group 1 underwent OF/OFD and 22 patients in Group 2 underwent TAF/TAFD. Among the various clinical parameters, skin incision size, length of hospital stay, analgesic using time, and postoperative neck pain (for the first 4 weeks after the operation) were favorable in Group 2. Surgical outcomes were not different between the two groups. In conclusion, TAF/TAFD should increase patient's compliance and is as clinically effective as much as the OF/OFD. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2719221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27192212009-08-04 Comparison Between Open Procedure and Tubular Retractor Assisted Procedure for Cervical Radiculopathy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study Kim, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Young-Baeg J Korean Med Sci Original Article Posterior cervical foraminotomy is an effective surgical technique for the treatment of radicular pain caused by foraminal stenosis or posterolateral herniated discs. The present study was performed to compare the clinical parameters and surgical outcomes of open foraminotomy/discectomy (OF/OFD) and tubular retractor assisted foraminotomy/discectomy (TAF/TAFD) in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. A total of 41 patients were divided into two groups: 19 patients in Group 1 underwent OF/OFD and 22 patients in Group 2 underwent TAF/TAFD. Among the various clinical parameters, skin incision size, length of hospital stay, analgesic using time, and postoperative neck pain (for the first 4 weeks after the operation) were favorable in Group 2. Surgical outcomes were not different between the two groups. In conclusion, TAF/TAFD should increase patient's compliance and is as clinically effective as much as the OF/OFD. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2009-08 2009-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2719221/ /pubmed/19654947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2009.24.4.649 Text en Copyright © 2009 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Young-Baeg Comparison Between Open Procedure and Tubular Retractor Assisted Procedure for Cervical Radiculopathy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study |
title | Comparison Between Open Procedure and Tubular Retractor Assisted Procedure for Cervical Radiculopathy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study |
title_full | Comparison Between Open Procedure and Tubular Retractor Assisted Procedure for Cervical Radiculopathy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison Between Open Procedure and Tubular Retractor Assisted Procedure for Cervical Radiculopathy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison Between Open Procedure and Tubular Retractor Assisted Procedure for Cervical Radiculopathy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study |
title_short | Comparison Between Open Procedure and Tubular Retractor Assisted Procedure for Cervical Radiculopathy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study |
title_sort | comparison between open procedure and tubular retractor assisted procedure for cervical radiculopathy: results of a randomized controlled study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2719221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19654947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2009.24.4.649 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimkyoungtae comparisonbetweenopenprocedureandtubularretractorassistedprocedureforcervicalradiculopathyresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT kimyoungbaeg comparisonbetweenopenprocedureandtubularretractorassistedprocedureforcervicalradiculopathyresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy |