Cargando…

Comparison Between Open Procedure and Tubular Retractor Assisted Procedure for Cervical Radiculopathy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study

Posterior cervical foraminotomy is an effective surgical technique for the treatment of radicular pain caused by foraminal stenosis or posterolateral herniated discs. The present study was performed to compare the clinical parameters and surgical outcomes of open foraminotomy/discectomy (OF/OFD) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Kyoung-Tae, Kim, Young-Baeg
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2719221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19654947
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2009.24.4.649
_version_ 1782170064578936832
author Kim, Kyoung-Tae
Kim, Young-Baeg
author_facet Kim, Kyoung-Tae
Kim, Young-Baeg
author_sort Kim, Kyoung-Tae
collection PubMed
description Posterior cervical foraminotomy is an effective surgical technique for the treatment of radicular pain caused by foraminal stenosis or posterolateral herniated discs. The present study was performed to compare the clinical parameters and surgical outcomes of open foraminotomy/discectomy (OF/OFD) and tubular retractor assisted foraminotomy/discectomy (TAF/TAFD) in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. A total of 41 patients were divided into two groups: 19 patients in Group 1 underwent OF/OFD and 22 patients in Group 2 underwent TAF/TAFD. Among the various clinical parameters, skin incision size, length of hospital stay, analgesic using time, and postoperative neck pain (for the first 4 weeks after the operation) were favorable in Group 2. Surgical outcomes were not different between the two groups. In conclusion, TAF/TAFD should increase patient's compliance and is as clinically effective as much as the OF/OFD.
format Text
id pubmed-2719221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27192212009-08-04 Comparison Between Open Procedure and Tubular Retractor Assisted Procedure for Cervical Radiculopathy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study Kim, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Young-Baeg J Korean Med Sci Original Article Posterior cervical foraminotomy is an effective surgical technique for the treatment of radicular pain caused by foraminal stenosis or posterolateral herniated discs. The present study was performed to compare the clinical parameters and surgical outcomes of open foraminotomy/discectomy (OF/OFD) and tubular retractor assisted foraminotomy/discectomy (TAF/TAFD) in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. A total of 41 patients were divided into two groups: 19 patients in Group 1 underwent OF/OFD and 22 patients in Group 2 underwent TAF/TAFD. Among the various clinical parameters, skin incision size, length of hospital stay, analgesic using time, and postoperative neck pain (for the first 4 weeks after the operation) were favorable in Group 2. Surgical outcomes were not different between the two groups. In conclusion, TAF/TAFD should increase patient's compliance and is as clinically effective as much as the OF/OFD. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2009-08 2009-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2719221/ /pubmed/19654947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2009.24.4.649 Text en Copyright © 2009 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Kyoung-Tae
Kim, Young-Baeg
Comparison Between Open Procedure and Tubular Retractor Assisted Procedure for Cervical Radiculopathy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study
title Comparison Between Open Procedure and Tubular Retractor Assisted Procedure for Cervical Radiculopathy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study
title_full Comparison Between Open Procedure and Tubular Retractor Assisted Procedure for Cervical Radiculopathy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study
title_fullStr Comparison Between Open Procedure and Tubular Retractor Assisted Procedure for Cervical Radiculopathy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between Open Procedure and Tubular Retractor Assisted Procedure for Cervical Radiculopathy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study
title_short Comparison Between Open Procedure and Tubular Retractor Assisted Procedure for Cervical Radiculopathy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study
title_sort comparison between open procedure and tubular retractor assisted procedure for cervical radiculopathy: results of a randomized controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2719221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19654947
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2009.24.4.649
work_keys_str_mv AT kimkyoungtae comparisonbetweenopenprocedureandtubularretractorassistedprocedureforcervicalradiculopathyresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kimyoungbaeg comparisonbetweenopenprocedureandtubularretractorassistedprocedureforcervicalradiculopathyresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy