Cargando…

KSP inhibitor ARRY-520 as a substitute for Paclitaxel in Type I ovarian cancer cells

BACKGROUND: We previously described a sub-population of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cells with a functional TLR-4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway (Type I EOC cells), which confers the capacity to respond to Paclitaxel, a known TLR-4 ligand, by enhancing NF-κB activity and upregulating cytokine secretion – e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Ki Hyung, Xie, Yanhua, Tytler, Ewan M, Woessner, Richard, Mor, Gil, Alvero, Ayesha B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2719595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19619321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-7-63
_version_ 1782170073464569856
author Kim, Ki Hyung
Xie, Yanhua
Tytler, Ewan M
Woessner, Richard
Mor, Gil
Alvero, Ayesha B
author_facet Kim, Ki Hyung
Xie, Yanhua
Tytler, Ewan M
Woessner, Richard
Mor, Gil
Alvero, Ayesha B
author_sort Kim, Ki Hyung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We previously described a sub-population of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cells with a functional TLR-4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway (Type I EOC cells), which confers the capacity to respond to Paclitaxel, a known TLR-4 ligand, by enhancing NF-κB activity and upregulating cytokine secretion – events that are known to promote tumor progression. It is therefore important to distinguish those patients that should not receive Paclitaxel; it is also important to identify alternative chemotherapy options that would benefit this sub-group of patients. The objective of this study is to determine if the KSP inhibitor, ARRY-520, can be a substitute for Paclitaxel in patients with Type I EOC. METHODS: EOC cells isolated from either ascites or tumor tissue were treated with increasing concentrations of ARRY-520 or Paclitaxel and cell viability determined. Activation of the apoptotic pathway was determined using Western blot analysis. Mitochondrial integrity was quantified using JC1 dye. Cytokine profiling was performed from supernatants using xMAP technology. NF-κB activity was measured using a Luciferase reporter system. In vivo activity was determined using a subcutaneous xenograft mouse model. RESULTS: ARRY-520 and Paclitaxel exhibited the same cytotoxic effect on Type I and II cells. The GI(50 )at 48 h for Type II EOC cells was 0.0015 μM and 0.2 μM for ARRY-520 and Paclitaxel, respectively. For Type I EOC cells, the GI(50 )at 48 h was > 3 μM and >20 μM for ARRY-520 and Paclitaxel, respectively. Decrease in the number of viable cells was accompanied by mitochondrial depolarization and caspase activation. Unlike Paclitaxel, ARRY-520 did not induce NF-κB activation, did not enhance cytokine secretion, nor induce ERK phosphorylation in Type I EOC cells. CONCLUSION: Administration of Paclitaxel to patients with high percentage Type I cancer cells could have detrimental effects due to Paclitaxel-induced enhancement of NF-κB and ERK activities, and cytokine production (e.g. IL-6), which promote chemoresistance and tumor progression. ARRY-520 has similar anti-tumor activity in EOC cells as that of Paclitaxel. However, unlike Paclitaxel, it does not induce these pro-tumor effects in Type I cells. Therefore, the KSP inhibitor ARRY-520 may represent an alternative to Paclitaxel in this subgroup of EOC patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2719595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27195952009-08-01 KSP inhibitor ARRY-520 as a substitute for Paclitaxel in Type I ovarian cancer cells Kim, Ki Hyung Xie, Yanhua Tytler, Ewan M Woessner, Richard Mor, Gil Alvero, Ayesha B J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: We previously described a sub-population of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cells with a functional TLR-4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway (Type I EOC cells), which confers the capacity to respond to Paclitaxel, a known TLR-4 ligand, by enhancing NF-κB activity and upregulating cytokine secretion – events that are known to promote tumor progression. It is therefore important to distinguish those patients that should not receive Paclitaxel; it is also important to identify alternative chemotherapy options that would benefit this sub-group of patients. The objective of this study is to determine if the KSP inhibitor, ARRY-520, can be a substitute for Paclitaxel in patients with Type I EOC. METHODS: EOC cells isolated from either ascites or tumor tissue were treated with increasing concentrations of ARRY-520 or Paclitaxel and cell viability determined. Activation of the apoptotic pathway was determined using Western blot analysis. Mitochondrial integrity was quantified using JC1 dye. Cytokine profiling was performed from supernatants using xMAP technology. NF-κB activity was measured using a Luciferase reporter system. In vivo activity was determined using a subcutaneous xenograft mouse model. RESULTS: ARRY-520 and Paclitaxel exhibited the same cytotoxic effect on Type I and II cells. The GI(50 )at 48 h for Type II EOC cells was 0.0015 μM and 0.2 μM for ARRY-520 and Paclitaxel, respectively. For Type I EOC cells, the GI(50 )at 48 h was > 3 μM and >20 μM for ARRY-520 and Paclitaxel, respectively. Decrease in the number of viable cells was accompanied by mitochondrial depolarization and caspase activation. Unlike Paclitaxel, ARRY-520 did not induce NF-κB activation, did not enhance cytokine secretion, nor induce ERK phosphorylation in Type I EOC cells. CONCLUSION: Administration of Paclitaxel to patients with high percentage Type I cancer cells could have detrimental effects due to Paclitaxel-induced enhancement of NF-κB and ERK activities, and cytokine production (e.g. IL-6), which promote chemoresistance and tumor progression. ARRY-520 has similar anti-tumor activity in EOC cells as that of Paclitaxel. However, unlike Paclitaxel, it does not induce these pro-tumor effects in Type I cells. Therefore, the KSP inhibitor ARRY-520 may represent an alternative to Paclitaxel in this subgroup of EOC patients. BioMed Central 2009-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2719595/ /pubmed/19619321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-7-63 Text en Copyright © 2009 Kim et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kim, Ki Hyung
Xie, Yanhua
Tytler, Ewan M
Woessner, Richard
Mor, Gil
Alvero, Ayesha B
KSP inhibitor ARRY-520 as a substitute for Paclitaxel in Type I ovarian cancer cells
title KSP inhibitor ARRY-520 as a substitute for Paclitaxel in Type I ovarian cancer cells
title_full KSP inhibitor ARRY-520 as a substitute for Paclitaxel in Type I ovarian cancer cells
title_fullStr KSP inhibitor ARRY-520 as a substitute for Paclitaxel in Type I ovarian cancer cells
title_full_unstemmed KSP inhibitor ARRY-520 as a substitute for Paclitaxel in Type I ovarian cancer cells
title_short KSP inhibitor ARRY-520 as a substitute for Paclitaxel in Type I ovarian cancer cells
title_sort ksp inhibitor arry-520 as a substitute for paclitaxel in type i ovarian cancer cells
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2719595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19619321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-7-63
work_keys_str_mv AT kimkihyung kspinhibitorarry520asasubstituteforpaclitaxelintypeiovariancancercells
AT xieyanhua kspinhibitorarry520asasubstituteforpaclitaxelintypeiovariancancercells
AT tytlerewanm kspinhibitorarry520asasubstituteforpaclitaxelintypeiovariancancercells
AT woessnerrichard kspinhibitorarry520asasubstituteforpaclitaxelintypeiovariancancercells
AT morgil kspinhibitorarry520asasubstituteforpaclitaxelintypeiovariancancercells
AT alveroayeshab kspinhibitorarry520asasubstituteforpaclitaxelintypeiovariancancercells