Cargando…

Women and Heart Disease: Neglected Directions for Future Research

Before age 65, women have less heart disease than men. For many years, estrogen was the most popular explanation for this female advantage, and observational studies through the 1980s showed a lower risk of heart attacks in postmenopausal women taking “replacement” estrogen. But the Women’s Health I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2719729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19654884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-009-9110-0
_version_ 1782170095209938944
author Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth
author_facet Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth
author_sort Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description Before age 65, women have less heart disease than men. For many years, estrogen was the most popular explanation for this female advantage, and observational studies through the 1980s showed a lower risk of heart attacks in postmenopausal women taking “replacement” estrogen. But the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI), the first placebo-controlled trials of hormone therapy with the size and statistical power necessary to study clinical cardiovascular outcomes, did not confirm the hormone-healthy heart hypothesis. Now, at least 5 years later, the most unexpected WHI result may be how resilient the estrogen hypothesis has been. Where, beyond estrogen therapy, should we go from here to explain the striking sex differences in heart disease rates? A broader spectrum of research about the female cardiovascular advantage and its translation is needed.
format Text
id pubmed-2719729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27197292009-08-03 Women and Heart Disease: Neglected Directions for Future Research Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth J Cardiovasc Transl Res Article Before age 65, women have less heart disease than men. For many years, estrogen was the most popular explanation for this female advantage, and observational studies through the 1980s showed a lower risk of heart attacks in postmenopausal women taking “replacement” estrogen. But the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI), the first placebo-controlled trials of hormone therapy with the size and statistical power necessary to study clinical cardiovascular outcomes, did not confirm the hormone-healthy heart hypothesis. Now, at least 5 years later, the most unexpected WHI result may be how resilient the estrogen hypothesis has been. Where, beyond estrogen therapy, should we go from here to explain the striking sex differences in heart disease rates? A broader spectrum of research about the female cardiovascular advantage and its translation is needed. Springer US 2009-07-03 2009-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2719729/ /pubmed/19654884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-009-9110-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2009
spellingShingle Article
Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth
Women and Heart Disease: Neglected Directions for Future Research
title Women and Heart Disease: Neglected Directions for Future Research
title_full Women and Heart Disease: Neglected Directions for Future Research
title_fullStr Women and Heart Disease: Neglected Directions for Future Research
title_full_unstemmed Women and Heart Disease: Neglected Directions for Future Research
title_short Women and Heart Disease: Neglected Directions for Future Research
title_sort women and heart disease: neglected directions for future research
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2719729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19654884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-009-9110-0
work_keys_str_mv AT barrettconnorelizabeth womenandheartdiseaseneglecteddirectionsforfutureresearch