Cargando…

Sunitinib and bevacizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and indirect comparison of clinical effectiveness

BACKGROUND: Two new agents have recently been licensed for use in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Europe. This paper aims to systematically review the evidence from all available randomised clinical trials of sunitinib and bevacizumab (in combination with interferon-α (IFN-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson Coon, J S, Liu, Z, Hoyle, M, Rogers, G, Green, C, Moxham, T, Welch, K, Stein, K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2720220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19568242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605167
_version_ 1782170119530610688
author Thompson Coon, J S
Liu, Z
Hoyle, M
Rogers, G
Green, C
Moxham, T
Welch, K
Stein, K
author_facet Thompson Coon, J S
Liu, Z
Hoyle, M
Rogers, G
Green, C
Moxham, T
Welch, K
Stein, K
author_sort Thompson Coon, J S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two new agents have recently been licensed for use in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Europe. This paper aims to systematically review the evidence from all available randomised clinical trials of sunitinib and bevacizumab (in combination with interferon-α (IFN-α)) in the treatment of advanced metastatic RCC. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were performed in six electronic databases. Bibliographies of included studies were searched for further relevant studies. Individual conference proceedings were searched using their online interfaces. Studies were selected according to the predefined criteria. All randomised clinical trials of sunitinib or bevacizumab in combination with IFN for treating advanced metastatic RCC in accordance with the European licensed indication were included. Study selection, data extraction, validation and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers with disagreements being settled by discussion. The effects of sunitinib and bevacizumab (in combination with IFN-α) on progression-free survival were compared indirectly using Bayesian Markov Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) sampling in Win BUGS, with IFN as a common comparator. RESULTS: Three studies were included. Median progression-free survival was significantly prolonged with both interventions (from approximately 5 months to between 8 and 11 months) compared with IFN. Overall survival was also prolonged, compared with IFN, although the published data are not fully mature. Indirect comparison suggests that sunitinib is superior to bevacizumab plus IFN in terms of progression-free survival (hazard ratios 0.796; 95% CI 0.63–1.0; P=0.0272). CONCLUSION: There is evidence to suggest that treatment with sunitinib and treatment with bevacizumab plus IFN has clinically relevant and statistically significant advantages over treatment with IFN alone in patients with metastatic RCC.
format Text
id pubmed-2720220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27202202010-07-21 Sunitinib and bevacizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and indirect comparison of clinical effectiveness Thompson Coon, J S Liu, Z Hoyle, M Rogers, G Green, C Moxham, T Welch, K Stein, K Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Two new agents have recently been licensed for use in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Europe. This paper aims to systematically review the evidence from all available randomised clinical trials of sunitinib and bevacizumab (in combination with interferon-α (IFN-α)) in the treatment of advanced metastatic RCC. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were performed in six electronic databases. Bibliographies of included studies were searched for further relevant studies. Individual conference proceedings were searched using their online interfaces. Studies were selected according to the predefined criteria. All randomised clinical trials of sunitinib or bevacizumab in combination with IFN for treating advanced metastatic RCC in accordance with the European licensed indication were included. Study selection, data extraction, validation and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers with disagreements being settled by discussion. The effects of sunitinib and bevacizumab (in combination with IFN-α) on progression-free survival were compared indirectly using Bayesian Markov Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) sampling in Win BUGS, with IFN as a common comparator. RESULTS: Three studies were included. Median progression-free survival was significantly prolonged with both interventions (from approximately 5 months to between 8 and 11 months) compared with IFN. Overall survival was also prolonged, compared with IFN, although the published data are not fully mature. Indirect comparison suggests that sunitinib is superior to bevacizumab plus IFN in terms of progression-free survival (hazard ratios 0.796; 95% CI 0.63–1.0; P=0.0272). CONCLUSION: There is evidence to suggest that treatment with sunitinib and treatment with bevacizumab plus IFN has clinically relevant and statistically significant advantages over treatment with IFN alone in patients with metastatic RCC. Nature Publishing Group 2009-07-21 2009-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2720220/ /pubmed/19568242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605167 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Thompson Coon, J S
Liu, Z
Hoyle, M
Rogers, G
Green, C
Moxham, T
Welch, K
Stein, K
Sunitinib and bevacizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and indirect comparison of clinical effectiveness
title Sunitinib and bevacizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and indirect comparison of clinical effectiveness
title_full Sunitinib and bevacizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and indirect comparison of clinical effectiveness
title_fullStr Sunitinib and bevacizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and indirect comparison of clinical effectiveness
title_full_unstemmed Sunitinib and bevacizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and indirect comparison of clinical effectiveness
title_short Sunitinib and bevacizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and indirect comparison of clinical effectiveness
title_sort sunitinib and bevacizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and indirect comparison of clinical effectiveness
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2720220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19568242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605167
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsoncoonjs sunitinibandbevacizumabforfirstlinetreatmentofmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandindirectcomparisonofclinicaleffectiveness
AT liuz sunitinibandbevacizumabforfirstlinetreatmentofmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandindirectcomparisonofclinicaleffectiveness
AT hoylem sunitinibandbevacizumabforfirstlinetreatmentofmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandindirectcomparisonofclinicaleffectiveness
AT rogersg sunitinibandbevacizumabforfirstlinetreatmentofmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandindirectcomparisonofclinicaleffectiveness
AT greenc sunitinibandbevacizumabforfirstlinetreatmentofmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandindirectcomparisonofclinicaleffectiveness
AT moxhamt sunitinibandbevacizumabforfirstlinetreatmentofmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandindirectcomparisonofclinicaleffectiveness
AT welchk sunitinibandbevacizumabforfirstlinetreatmentofmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandindirectcomparisonofclinicaleffectiveness
AT steink sunitinibandbevacizumabforfirstlinetreatmentofmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandindirectcomparisonofclinicaleffectiveness