Cargando…

Prognostic and predictive value of common mutations for treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: We address the prognostic and predictive value of KRAS, PIK3CA and BRAF mutations for clinical outcomes in response to active agents in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: We determined KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in tumours from 168 patients treated for mC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Souglakos, J, Philips, J, Wang, R, Marwah, S, Silver, M, Tzardi, M, Silver, J, Ogino, S, Hooshmand, S, Kwak, E, Freed, E, Meyerhardt, J A, Saridaki, Z, Georgoulias, V, Finkelstein, D, Fuchs, C S, Kulke, M H, Shivdasani, R A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2720232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19603024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605164
_version_ 1782170122420486144
author Souglakos, J
Philips, J
Wang, R
Marwah, S
Silver, M
Tzardi, M
Silver, J
Ogino, S
Hooshmand, S
Kwak, E
Freed, E
Meyerhardt, J A
Saridaki, Z
Georgoulias, V
Finkelstein, D
Fuchs, C S
Kulke, M H
Shivdasani, R A
author_facet Souglakos, J
Philips, J
Wang, R
Marwah, S
Silver, M
Tzardi, M
Silver, J
Ogino, S
Hooshmand, S
Kwak, E
Freed, E
Meyerhardt, J A
Saridaki, Z
Georgoulias, V
Finkelstein, D
Fuchs, C S
Kulke, M H
Shivdasani, R A
author_sort Souglakos, J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We address the prognostic and predictive value of KRAS, PIK3CA and BRAF mutations for clinical outcomes in response to active agents in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: We determined KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in tumours from 168 patients treated for mCRC at two institutions. All patients received 5-FU-based first-line chemotherapy and treatment outcome was analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations were present in 62 (37%), 13 (8%) and 26 (15%) cases, respectively. Multivariate analysis uncovered BRAF mutation as an independent prognostic factor for decreased survival (hazard ratio (HR) 4.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1–7.6). In addition, patients with BRAF-mutant tumours had significantly lower progression-free survival (PFS: HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.2–7.4) than those whose tumors that carried wild-type BRAF. Among 92 patients treated using chemotherapy and cetuximab as salvage therapy, KRAS mutation was associated with lack of response (P=0.002) and shorter PFS (P=0.09). BRAF (P=0.0005) and PIK3CA (P=0.01) mutations also predicted reduced PFS in response to cetuximab salvage therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These results underscore the potential of mutational profiling to identify CRCs with different natural histories or treatment responses. The adverse significance of BRAF mutation should inform patient selection and stratification in clinical trials.
format Text
id pubmed-2720232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27202322010-08-04 Prognostic and predictive value of common mutations for treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer Souglakos, J Philips, J Wang, R Marwah, S Silver, M Tzardi, M Silver, J Ogino, S Hooshmand, S Kwak, E Freed, E Meyerhardt, J A Saridaki, Z Georgoulias, V Finkelstein, D Fuchs, C S Kulke, M H Shivdasani, R A Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: We address the prognostic and predictive value of KRAS, PIK3CA and BRAF mutations for clinical outcomes in response to active agents in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: We determined KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in tumours from 168 patients treated for mCRC at two institutions. All patients received 5-FU-based first-line chemotherapy and treatment outcome was analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations were present in 62 (37%), 13 (8%) and 26 (15%) cases, respectively. Multivariate analysis uncovered BRAF mutation as an independent prognostic factor for decreased survival (hazard ratio (HR) 4.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1–7.6). In addition, patients with BRAF-mutant tumours had significantly lower progression-free survival (PFS: HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.2–7.4) than those whose tumors that carried wild-type BRAF. Among 92 patients treated using chemotherapy and cetuximab as salvage therapy, KRAS mutation was associated with lack of response (P=0.002) and shorter PFS (P=0.09). BRAF (P=0.0005) and PIK3CA (P=0.01) mutations also predicted reduced PFS in response to cetuximab salvage therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These results underscore the potential of mutational profiling to identify CRCs with different natural histories or treatment responses. The adverse significance of BRAF mutation should inform patient selection and stratification in clinical trials. Nature Publishing Group 2009-08-04 2009-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2720232/ /pubmed/19603024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605164 Text en Copyright © 2009 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Molecular Diagnostics
Souglakos, J
Philips, J
Wang, R
Marwah, S
Silver, M
Tzardi, M
Silver, J
Ogino, S
Hooshmand, S
Kwak, E
Freed, E
Meyerhardt, J A
Saridaki, Z
Georgoulias, V
Finkelstein, D
Fuchs, C S
Kulke, M H
Shivdasani, R A
Prognostic and predictive value of common mutations for treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title Prognostic and predictive value of common mutations for treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full Prognostic and predictive value of common mutations for treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Prognostic and predictive value of common mutations for treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic and predictive value of common mutations for treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_short Prognostic and predictive value of common mutations for treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_sort prognostic and predictive value of common mutations for treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
topic Molecular Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2720232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19603024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605164
work_keys_str_mv AT souglakosj prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT philipsj prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT wangr prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT marwahs prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT silverm prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT tzardim prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT silverj prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT oginos prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT hooshmands prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT kwake prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT freede prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT meyerhardtja prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT saridakiz prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT georgouliasv prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT finkelsteind prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT fuchscs prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT kulkemh prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT shivdasanira prognosticandpredictivevalueofcommonmutationsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer