Cargando…

Impact and Flexural Strength, and Fracture Morphology of Acrylic Resins With Impact Modifiers

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the impact and flexural strength and analyzed the fracture behavior of acrylic resins. METHODS: Eighteen rectangular specimens were fabricated of Lucitone 550, QC 20 (both unreinforced acrylic resins), Impact 1500 (extra strength impact), Impact 2000 (high impact) ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faot, Fernanda, Panza, Leonardo H V, Garcia, Renata C M Rodrigues, Cury, Altair Antoninha Del Bel
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2720515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19657461
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210600903010137
_version_ 1782170135740547072
author Faot, Fernanda
Panza, Leonardo H V
Garcia, Renata C M Rodrigues
Cury, Altair Antoninha Del Bel
author_facet Faot, Fernanda
Panza, Leonardo H V
Garcia, Renata C M Rodrigues
Cury, Altair Antoninha Del Bel
author_sort Faot, Fernanda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the impact and flexural strength and analyzed the fracture behavior of acrylic resins. METHODS: Eighteen rectangular specimens were fabricated of Lucitone 550, QC 20 (both unreinforced acrylic resins), Impact 1500 (extra strength impact), Impact 2000 (high impact) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The impact strength was evaluated in notched specimens (50x6x4mm) and flexural strength in unotched (64x10x3.3mm), using three-point bending test, as well as, stress at yield, Young modulus and displacement at yield. Fragments from mechanical tests were observed by SEM. Data from impact strength, stress at yield and displacement at yield were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α=0.05). Young modulus values were analyzed by One-way ANOVA and Dunnett T3 multiple comparisons test (α=0.05). RESULTS: Mean values of impact strength and stress at yield values were higher (P<.005) for Impact 2000 while Young modulus was higher (P<.05) for Lucitone 550; Impact 1500 and Impact 2000 showed significant values (P<.05) in the displacement at yield. Impact fractures of the all acrylic resins were brittle. Bending fractures of Lucitone 550 and Impact 2000 were brittle, QC 20 fractures were ductile and Impact 1500 showed brittle (75%) and ductile (25%) fractures. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the Impact 2000 showed improved mechanical properties with high capacity of stress absorption and energy dissipation before the fracture.
format Text
id pubmed-2720515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27205152009-08-05 Impact and Flexural Strength, and Fracture Morphology of Acrylic Resins With Impact Modifiers Faot, Fernanda Panza, Leonardo H V Garcia, Renata C M Rodrigues Cury, Altair Antoninha Del Bel Open Dent J Article OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the impact and flexural strength and analyzed the fracture behavior of acrylic resins. METHODS: Eighteen rectangular specimens were fabricated of Lucitone 550, QC 20 (both unreinforced acrylic resins), Impact 1500 (extra strength impact), Impact 2000 (high impact) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The impact strength was evaluated in notched specimens (50x6x4mm) and flexural strength in unotched (64x10x3.3mm), using three-point bending test, as well as, stress at yield, Young modulus and displacement at yield. Fragments from mechanical tests were observed by SEM. Data from impact strength, stress at yield and displacement at yield were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α=0.05). Young modulus values were analyzed by One-way ANOVA and Dunnett T3 multiple comparisons test (α=0.05). RESULTS: Mean values of impact strength and stress at yield values were higher (P<.005) for Impact 2000 while Young modulus was higher (P<.05) for Lucitone 550; Impact 1500 and Impact 2000 showed significant values (P<.05) in the displacement at yield. Impact fractures of the all acrylic resins were brittle. Bending fractures of Lucitone 550 and Impact 2000 were brittle, QC 20 fractures were ductile and Impact 1500 showed brittle (75%) and ductile (25%) fractures. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the Impact 2000 showed improved mechanical properties with high capacity of stress absorption and energy dissipation before the fracture. Bentham Open 2009-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2720515/ /pubmed/19657461 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210600903010137 Text en © Faot et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Faot, Fernanda
Panza, Leonardo H V
Garcia, Renata C M Rodrigues
Cury, Altair Antoninha Del Bel
Impact and Flexural Strength, and Fracture Morphology of Acrylic Resins With Impact Modifiers
title Impact and Flexural Strength, and Fracture Morphology of Acrylic Resins With Impact Modifiers
title_full Impact and Flexural Strength, and Fracture Morphology of Acrylic Resins With Impact Modifiers
title_fullStr Impact and Flexural Strength, and Fracture Morphology of Acrylic Resins With Impact Modifiers
title_full_unstemmed Impact and Flexural Strength, and Fracture Morphology of Acrylic Resins With Impact Modifiers
title_short Impact and Flexural Strength, and Fracture Morphology of Acrylic Resins With Impact Modifiers
title_sort impact and flexural strength, and fracture morphology of acrylic resins with impact modifiers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2720515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19657461
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210600903010137
work_keys_str_mv AT faotfernanda impactandflexuralstrengthandfracturemorphologyofacrylicresinswithimpactmodifiers
AT panzaleonardohv impactandflexuralstrengthandfracturemorphologyofacrylicresinswithimpactmodifiers
AT garciarenatacmrodrigues impactandflexuralstrengthandfracturemorphologyofacrylicresinswithimpactmodifiers
AT curyaltairantoninhadelbel impactandflexuralstrengthandfracturemorphologyofacrylicresinswithimpactmodifiers