Cargando…

A meta-analysis of the effect of antibody therapy for the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this meta-analytic study was to determine the impact of RSV-IGIV and palivizumab on risk of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-related hospitalization. Secondary objectives were to determine if antibody therapy decreases the risk of RSV infection, intensive care a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Shaun K, Dzolganovski, Biljana, Beyene, Joseph, Sung, Lillian
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2720977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19575815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-106
_version_ 1782170162840993792
author Morris, Shaun K
Dzolganovski, Biljana
Beyene, Joseph
Sung, Lillian
author_facet Morris, Shaun K
Dzolganovski, Biljana
Beyene, Joseph
Sung, Lillian
author_sort Morris, Shaun K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this meta-analytic study was to determine the impact of RSV-IGIV and palivizumab on risk of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-related hospitalization. Secondary objectives were to determine if antibody therapy decreases the risk of RSV infection, intensive care admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality in high risk infant populations. METHODS: We performed searches of electronic data bases from 1966 to April 2009. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined a priori. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) There was randomization between polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies and placebo or no therapy, and 2) Polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies were given as prophylaxis. RESULTS: Of the six included studies, three utilized RSV-IGIV (total of 533 randomized to treatment groups) and three utilized palivizumab (total of 1,663 randomized to treatment groups). The absolute risk of hospitalization in the control arms was 12% and overall RR for all 2,196 children who received one of the antibody products was 0.53 (95% CI 0.43, 0.66), P < 0.00001. When looking only at the children who received palivizumab, the RR for hospitalization was 0.50 (95% CI 0.38, 0.66), P < 0.00001. For the children receiving RSV-IGIV, the RR for hospitalization was 0.59 (95% CI 0.42, 0.83, P < 0.002). The use of palivizumab resulted in a significant decrease in admission to the ICU (RR 0.29 (95% CI 0.14, 0.59; P = 0.0007). There was no significant reduction in the risk of mechanical ventilation or mortality with the use of antibody prophylaxis. Infants born at less than 35 weeks gestational age, and those with chronic lung and congenital heart disease all had a significant reduction in the risk of RSV hospitalization with children born under 35 weeks gestational age showing a trend towards the greatest benefit. CONCLUSION: Both palivizumab and RSV-IGIV decrease the incidence of RSV hospitalization and ICU admission and their effect appears to be qualitatively similarly. There was neither a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of mechanical ventilation nor in all cause mortality. This meta-analysis separately quantifies the impact of RSV-IGIV and palivizumab on various measures of severe RSV disease and builds upon a previous study that was only able to examine the pooled effect of all antibody products together.
format Text
id pubmed-2720977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27209772009-08-05 A meta-analysis of the effect of antibody therapy for the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection Morris, Shaun K Dzolganovski, Biljana Beyene, Joseph Sung, Lillian BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this meta-analytic study was to determine the impact of RSV-IGIV and palivizumab on risk of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-related hospitalization. Secondary objectives were to determine if antibody therapy decreases the risk of RSV infection, intensive care admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality in high risk infant populations. METHODS: We performed searches of electronic data bases from 1966 to April 2009. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined a priori. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) There was randomization between polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies and placebo or no therapy, and 2) Polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies were given as prophylaxis. RESULTS: Of the six included studies, three utilized RSV-IGIV (total of 533 randomized to treatment groups) and three utilized palivizumab (total of 1,663 randomized to treatment groups). The absolute risk of hospitalization in the control arms was 12% and overall RR for all 2,196 children who received one of the antibody products was 0.53 (95% CI 0.43, 0.66), P < 0.00001. When looking only at the children who received palivizumab, the RR for hospitalization was 0.50 (95% CI 0.38, 0.66), P < 0.00001. For the children receiving RSV-IGIV, the RR for hospitalization was 0.59 (95% CI 0.42, 0.83, P < 0.002). The use of palivizumab resulted in a significant decrease in admission to the ICU (RR 0.29 (95% CI 0.14, 0.59; P = 0.0007). There was no significant reduction in the risk of mechanical ventilation or mortality with the use of antibody prophylaxis. Infants born at less than 35 weeks gestational age, and those with chronic lung and congenital heart disease all had a significant reduction in the risk of RSV hospitalization with children born under 35 weeks gestational age showing a trend towards the greatest benefit. CONCLUSION: Both palivizumab and RSV-IGIV decrease the incidence of RSV hospitalization and ICU admission and their effect appears to be qualitatively similarly. There was neither a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of mechanical ventilation nor in all cause mortality. This meta-analysis separately quantifies the impact of RSV-IGIV and palivizumab on various measures of severe RSV disease and builds upon a previous study that was only able to examine the pooled effect of all antibody products together. BioMed Central 2009-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2720977/ /pubmed/19575815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-106 Text en Copyright ©2009 Morris et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Morris, Shaun K
Dzolganovski, Biljana
Beyene, Joseph
Sung, Lillian
A meta-analysis of the effect of antibody therapy for the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection
title A meta-analysis of the effect of antibody therapy for the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection
title_full A meta-analysis of the effect of antibody therapy for the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of the effect of antibody therapy for the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of the effect of antibody therapy for the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection
title_short A meta-analysis of the effect of antibody therapy for the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection
title_sort meta-analysis of the effect of antibody therapy for the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2720977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19575815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-106
work_keys_str_mv AT morrisshaunk ametaanalysisoftheeffectofantibodytherapyforthepreventionofsevererespiratorysyncytialvirusinfection
AT dzolganovskibiljana ametaanalysisoftheeffectofantibodytherapyforthepreventionofsevererespiratorysyncytialvirusinfection
AT beyenejoseph ametaanalysisoftheeffectofantibodytherapyforthepreventionofsevererespiratorysyncytialvirusinfection
AT sunglillian ametaanalysisoftheeffectofantibodytherapyforthepreventionofsevererespiratorysyncytialvirusinfection
AT morrisshaunk metaanalysisoftheeffectofantibodytherapyforthepreventionofsevererespiratorysyncytialvirusinfection
AT dzolganovskibiljana metaanalysisoftheeffectofantibodytherapyforthepreventionofsevererespiratorysyncytialvirusinfection
AT beyenejoseph metaanalysisoftheeffectofantibodytherapyforthepreventionofsevererespiratorysyncytialvirusinfection
AT sunglillian metaanalysisoftheeffectofantibodytherapyforthepreventionofsevererespiratorysyncytialvirusinfection