Cargando…

Prediction model and prognostic index to estimate clinically relevant pelvic organ prolapse in a general female population

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Estimation on prevalence and distribution of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) signs in a general female population is difficult. We therefore developed and validated a prediction model and prognostic instrument. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to a general female population...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slieker-ten Hove, Marijke C. Ph., Pool-Goudzwaard, Annelies L., Eijkemans, Marinus J. C., Steegers-Theunissen, Regine P. M., Burger, Curt W., Vierhout, Mark E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2721134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19444367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0903-0
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Estimation on prevalence and distribution of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) signs in a general female population is difficult. We therefore developed and validated a prediction model and prognostic instrument. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to a general female population (45–85 years). A random sample underwent vaginal examination for POP (POPQ). A prediction model was developed using multivariate analysis and validated in a subgroup of participants. RESULTS: Positive questionnaire-response rate was 46.8% (1,397 of 2,979). From the questionnaire group, 649 women were vaginally examined (46.5%). Prevalence of clinically relevant POP was 21%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly higher odds ratios on the report of vaginal bulging, parity ≥2 and a mother with POP. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed areas under the curve of 0.672 and 0.640. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of POP at or beyond the hymen could be estimated in a general female population using our prediction model with 17 questions and our POP score chart with eight questions.