Cargando…

Prolene (mesh) bulbourethral sling in male incontinence

OBJECTIVE: We present our preliminary results of bulbar urethral sling (single bolster) in treatment of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPUI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 2003 to June 2005, six patients with postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (transurethral resection of prostate in f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kapoor, Rakesh, Singh, Kamal Jeet, Suri, Amit, Singh, Pratipal, Mandhani, Anil
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2721491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19675758
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.30262
_version_ 1782170198540812288
author Kapoor, Rakesh
Singh, Kamal Jeet
Suri, Amit
Singh, Pratipal
Mandhani, Anil
author_facet Kapoor, Rakesh
Singh, Kamal Jeet
Suri, Amit
Singh, Pratipal
Mandhani, Anil
author_sort Kapoor, Rakesh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We present our preliminary results of bulbar urethral sling (single bolster) in treatment of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPUI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 2003 to June 2005, six patients with postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (transurethral resection of prostate in five patients and after open prostatectomy in one patient) underwent prolene mesh bulbar urethral sling surgery. Preoperative evaluation included physical examination, neurological assessment, stress cystogram and urethrocystoscopy. Urodynamic evaluation was done in all patients for abdominal leak point pressure and ruling out bladder pathology. RESULTS: Urodynamic studies did not demonstrate bladder instability in any patient. Mean abdominal leak point pressure was 43cm of water (range 26–80 cm of water). Mean duration of hospital stay was 3.2 days. Follow-up ranged from 6–22 months. Four patients out of six patients were completely dry till their last follow-up. One patient developed mild stress incontinence after one year of the surgery and required use of one to two pads per day. Mean pad use after surgery was 0.6 pads per day in comparison to mean pad usage of 6.4 pads per day preoperatively. One patient was over-continent after the procedure and required clean intermittent catheterization till last follow-up (six months). Mean cost of the procedure was $ 350+15. CONCLUSION: Prolene bulbar urethral sling (single bolster) is an economically effective option in patients with postprostatectomy urinary incontinence.
format Text
id pubmed-2721491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27214912009-08-12 Prolene (mesh) bulbourethral sling in male incontinence Kapoor, Rakesh Singh, Kamal Jeet Suri, Amit Singh, Pratipal Mandhani, Anil Indian J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: We present our preliminary results of bulbar urethral sling (single bolster) in treatment of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPUI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 2003 to June 2005, six patients with postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (transurethral resection of prostate in five patients and after open prostatectomy in one patient) underwent prolene mesh bulbar urethral sling surgery. Preoperative evaluation included physical examination, neurological assessment, stress cystogram and urethrocystoscopy. Urodynamic evaluation was done in all patients for abdominal leak point pressure and ruling out bladder pathology. RESULTS: Urodynamic studies did not demonstrate bladder instability in any patient. Mean abdominal leak point pressure was 43cm of water (range 26–80 cm of water). Mean duration of hospital stay was 3.2 days. Follow-up ranged from 6–22 months. Four patients out of six patients were completely dry till their last follow-up. One patient developed mild stress incontinence after one year of the surgery and required use of one to two pads per day. Mean pad use after surgery was 0.6 pads per day in comparison to mean pad usage of 6.4 pads per day preoperatively. One patient was over-continent after the procedure and required clean intermittent catheterization till last follow-up (six months). Mean cost of the procedure was $ 350+15. CONCLUSION: Prolene bulbar urethral sling (single bolster) is an economically effective option in patients with postprostatectomy urinary incontinence. Medknow Publications 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC2721491/ /pubmed/19675758 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.30262 Text en © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kapoor, Rakesh
Singh, Kamal Jeet
Suri, Amit
Singh, Pratipal
Mandhani, Anil
Prolene (mesh) bulbourethral sling in male incontinence
title Prolene (mesh) bulbourethral sling in male incontinence
title_full Prolene (mesh) bulbourethral sling in male incontinence
title_fullStr Prolene (mesh) bulbourethral sling in male incontinence
title_full_unstemmed Prolene (mesh) bulbourethral sling in male incontinence
title_short Prolene (mesh) bulbourethral sling in male incontinence
title_sort prolene (mesh) bulbourethral sling in male incontinence
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2721491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19675758
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.30262
work_keys_str_mv AT kapoorrakesh prolenemeshbulbourethralslinginmaleincontinence
AT singhkamaljeet prolenemeshbulbourethralslinginmaleincontinence
AT suriamit prolenemeshbulbourethralslinginmaleincontinence
AT singhpratipal prolenemeshbulbourethralslinginmaleincontinence
AT mandhanianil prolenemeshbulbourethralslinginmaleincontinence