Cargando…

Testicular microlithiasis: Is there an agreed protocol?

This review addresses the issues on etiopathogenesis of testicular microlithiasis (TM), associated clinical entities, evaluation and follow-up of patients with TM. A literature search of Medline/PubMed was carried out using the keywords ‘testicular microlithiasis’ and ‘testicular calcifications’ for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shanmugasundaram, R., Singh, J. Chandra, Kekre, Nitin S.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2721596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19718320
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.33442
_version_ 1782170221411303424
author Shanmugasundaram, R.
Singh, J. Chandra
Kekre, Nitin S.
author_facet Shanmugasundaram, R.
Singh, J. Chandra
Kekre, Nitin S.
author_sort Shanmugasundaram, R.
collection PubMed
description This review addresses the issues on etiopathogenesis of testicular microlithiasis (TM), associated clinical entities, evaluation and follow-up of patients with TM. A literature search of Medline/PubMed was carried out using the keywords ‘testicular microlithiasis’ and ‘testicular calcifications’ for published data in English language on TM from 1970 to 2006. TM is an uncommon entity among adult males, resulting from intratubular calcifications. The reported incidence of TM is highly variable. With the increasing frequency of ultrasound examination in scrotal and testicular conditions and with the advent of high frequency transducers, TM is increasingly being reported. TM is associated with many benign and malignant conditions of testes but the possible association of TM with testicular cancer has been a matter of concern. Though a few sporadic cases of testicular malignancies have been reported, it is believed that a conservative approach is warranted in the absence of high risk factors, in view of the low risks for invasive cancers. There is no uniform protocol for the evaluation and follow-up of the patients with TM. Those with high risk factors like contralateral testicular tumour, chromosomal anomalies, gonadal dysgenesis, cryptorchidism and definite ultrasound pattern of TM should be advised to have further evaluation. Incidentally detected asymptomatic TM during ultrasound examination does not warrant aggressive measures and it can be followed with self examination.
format Text
id pubmed-2721596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27215962009-08-29 Testicular microlithiasis: Is there an agreed protocol? Shanmugasundaram, R. Singh, J. Chandra Kekre, Nitin S. Indian J Urol Review Article This review addresses the issues on etiopathogenesis of testicular microlithiasis (TM), associated clinical entities, evaluation and follow-up of patients with TM. A literature search of Medline/PubMed was carried out using the keywords ‘testicular microlithiasis’ and ‘testicular calcifications’ for published data in English language on TM from 1970 to 2006. TM is an uncommon entity among adult males, resulting from intratubular calcifications. The reported incidence of TM is highly variable. With the increasing frequency of ultrasound examination in scrotal and testicular conditions and with the advent of high frequency transducers, TM is increasingly being reported. TM is associated with many benign and malignant conditions of testes but the possible association of TM with testicular cancer has been a matter of concern. Though a few sporadic cases of testicular malignancies have been reported, it is believed that a conservative approach is warranted in the absence of high risk factors, in view of the low risks for invasive cancers. There is no uniform protocol for the evaluation and follow-up of the patients with TM. Those with high risk factors like contralateral testicular tumour, chromosomal anomalies, gonadal dysgenesis, cryptorchidism and definite ultrasound pattern of TM should be advised to have further evaluation. Incidentally detected asymptomatic TM during ultrasound examination does not warrant aggressive measures and it can be followed with self examination. Medknow Publications 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC2721596/ /pubmed/19718320 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.33442 Text en © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Shanmugasundaram, R.
Singh, J. Chandra
Kekre, Nitin S.
Testicular microlithiasis: Is there an agreed protocol?
title Testicular microlithiasis: Is there an agreed protocol?
title_full Testicular microlithiasis: Is there an agreed protocol?
title_fullStr Testicular microlithiasis: Is there an agreed protocol?
title_full_unstemmed Testicular microlithiasis: Is there an agreed protocol?
title_short Testicular microlithiasis: Is there an agreed protocol?
title_sort testicular microlithiasis: is there an agreed protocol?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2721596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19718320
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.33442
work_keys_str_mv AT shanmugasundaramr testicularmicrolithiasisisthereanagreedprotocol
AT singhjchandra testicularmicrolithiasisisthereanagreedprotocol
AT kekrenitins testicularmicrolithiasisisthereanagreedprotocol