Cargando…

Single-centre experience of laparoscopic nephrectomy: Impact of learning curve on outcome

AIM: To present our experience of laparoscopic nephrectomies done for benign and malignant conditions; and the impact of learning curve on outcome. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Retrospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and September 2006, 396 laparoscopic nephrectomies were performed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jha, Mrigank S., Gupta, Nitin, Agrawal, Saurabh, Ansari, M. S., Dubey, Deepak, Mandhani, Anil, Srivastava, Aneesh, Kumar, Anant, Kapoor, Rakesh
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2721601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19718325
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.33719
_version_ 1782170222601437184
author Jha, Mrigank S.
Gupta, Nitin
Agrawal, Saurabh
Ansari, M. S.
Dubey, Deepak
Mandhani, Anil
Srivastava, Aneesh
Kumar, Anant
Kapoor, Rakesh
author_facet Jha, Mrigank S.
Gupta, Nitin
Agrawal, Saurabh
Ansari, M. S.
Dubey, Deepak
Mandhani, Anil
Srivastava, Aneesh
Kumar, Anant
Kapoor, Rakesh
author_sort Jha, Mrigank S.
collection PubMed
description AIM: To present our experience of laparoscopic nephrectomies done for benign and malignant conditions; and the impact of learning curve on outcome. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Retrospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and September 2006, 396 laparoscopic nephrectomies were performed at our institute for various benign and malignant conditions. These included 250 simple nephrectomies, 48 nephroureterectomies, 95 radical nephrectomies, two partial nephrectomies and one hemi-nephrectomy. For the purpose of self-evaluation, we have divided our experience into two groups. Group 1 (learning phase) comprised the first 100 cases; Group 2 (consolidation phase) comprised cases performed after the initial learning phase. Retrospective evaluation of the case records was done to evaluate the differences in the operative and postoperative outcome. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Student's ‘t’ test using SPSS 14.0 software. RESULTS: Demographic profile of the patients and relative indications of procedures performed were similar in the two groups. Mean operative time in Group 1 was 262 ± 37 min, which reduced to 184 ± 44 min in Group 2 (P<0.001). Mean operative blood loss was 310 ± 58 ml and 198 ± 88 ml (P<0.001); and blood transfusion was required in 38% and 13.5% of patients (P<0.001) of Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. There was a significant reduction in the intraoperative and postoperative complications from 16% in Group 1 to 3.4% in Group 2 (P<0.001). Similarly, conversion to an open procedure was required in 17% cases of Group 1 and 5.4% cases of Group 2 (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephrectomy is a viable option which can be performed safely with increasing experience.
format Text
id pubmed-2721601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27216012009-08-29 Single-centre experience of laparoscopic nephrectomy: Impact of learning curve on outcome Jha, Mrigank S. Gupta, Nitin Agrawal, Saurabh Ansari, M. S. Dubey, Deepak Mandhani, Anil Srivastava, Aneesh Kumar, Anant Kapoor, Rakesh Indian J Urol Original Article AIM: To present our experience of laparoscopic nephrectomies done for benign and malignant conditions; and the impact of learning curve on outcome. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Retrospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and September 2006, 396 laparoscopic nephrectomies were performed at our institute for various benign and malignant conditions. These included 250 simple nephrectomies, 48 nephroureterectomies, 95 radical nephrectomies, two partial nephrectomies and one hemi-nephrectomy. For the purpose of self-evaluation, we have divided our experience into two groups. Group 1 (learning phase) comprised the first 100 cases; Group 2 (consolidation phase) comprised cases performed after the initial learning phase. Retrospective evaluation of the case records was done to evaluate the differences in the operative and postoperative outcome. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Student's ‘t’ test using SPSS 14.0 software. RESULTS: Demographic profile of the patients and relative indications of procedures performed were similar in the two groups. Mean operative time in Group 1 was 262 ± 37 min, which reduced to 184 ± 44 min in Group 2 (P<0.001). Mean operative blood loss was 310 ± 58 ml and 198 ± 88 ml (P<0.001); and blood transfusion was required in 38% and 13.5% of patients (P<0.001) of Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. There was a significant reduction in the intraoperative and postoperative complications from 16% in Group 1 to 3.4% in Group 2 (P<0.001). Similarly, conversion to an open procedure was required in 17% cases of Group 1 and 5.4% cases of Group 2 (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephrectomy is a viable option which can be performed safely with increasing experience. Medknow Publications 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC2721601/ /pubmed/19718325 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.33719 Text en © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jha, Mrigank S.
Gupta, Nitin
Agrawal, Saurabh
Ansari, M. S.
Dubey, Deepak
Mandhani, Anil
Srivastava, Aneesh
Kumar, Anant
Kapoor, Rakesh
Single-centre experience of laparoscopic nephrectomy: Impact of learning curve on outcome
title Single-centre experience of laparoscopic nephrectomy: Impact of learning curve on outcome
title_full Single-centre experience of laparoscopic nephrectomy: Impact of learning curve on outcome
title_fullStr Single-centre experience of laparoscopic nephrectomy: Impact of learning curve on outcome
title_full_unstemmed Single-centre experience of laparoscopic nephrectomy: Impact of learning curve on outcome
title_short Single-centre experience of laparoscopic nephrectomy: Impact of learning curve on outcome
title_sort single-centre experience of laparoscopic nephrectomy: impact of learning curve on outcome
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2721601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19718325
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.33719
work_keys_str_mv AT jhamriganks singlecentreexperienceoflaparoscopicnephrectomyimpactoflearningcurveonoutcome
AT guptanitin singlecentreexperienceoflaparoscopicnephrectomyimpactoflearningcurveonoutcome
AT agrawalsaurabh singlecentreexperienceoflaparoscopicnephrectomyimpactoflearningcurveonoutcome
AT ansarims singlecentreexperienceoflaparoscopicnephrectomyimpactoflearningcurveonoutcome
AT dubeydeepak singlecentreexperienceoflaparoscopicnephrectomyimpactoflearningcurveonoutcome
AT mandhanianil singlecentreexperienceoflaparoscopicnephrectomyimpactoflearningcurveonoutcome
AT srivastavaaneesh singlecentreexperienceoflaparoscopicnephrectomyimpactoflearningcurveonoutcome
AT kumaranant singlecentreexperienceoflaparoscopicnephrectomyimpactoflearningcurveonoutcome
AT kapoorrakesh singlecentreexperienceoflaparoscopicnephrectomyimpactoflearningcurveonoutcome