Cargando…
Marginal kidney donor
Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for a medically eligible patient with end stage renal disease. The number of renal transplants has increased rapidly over the last two decades. However, the demand for organs has increased even more. This disparity between the availability of organs a...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2721608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19718332 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.33726 |
_version_ | 1782170224277061632 |
---|---|
author | Gopalakrishnan, Ganesh Gourabathini, Siva Prasad |
author_facet | Gopalakrishnan, Ganesh Gourabathini, Siva Prasad |
author_sort | Gopalakrishnan, Ganesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for a medically eligible patient with end stage renal disease. The number of renal transplants has increased rapidly over the last two decades. However, the demand for organs has increased even more. This disparity between the availability of organs and waitlisted patients for transplants has forced many transplant centers across the world to use marginal kidneys and donors. We performed a Medline search to establish the current status of marginal kidney donors in the world. Transplant programs using marginal deceased renal grafts is well established. The focus is now on efforts to improve their results. Utilization of non-heart-beating donors is still in a plateau phase and comprises a minor percentage of deceased donations. The main concern is primary non-function of the renal graft apart from legal and ethical issues. Transplants with living donors outnumbered cadaveric transplants at many centers in the last decade. There has been an increased use of marginal living kidney donors with some acceptable medical risks. Our primary concern is the safety of the living donor. There is not enough scientific data available to quantify the risks involved for such donation. The definition of marginal living donor is still not clear and there are no uniform recommendations. The decision must be tailored to each donor who in turn should be actively involved at all levels of the decision-making process. In the current circumstances, our responsibility is very crucial in making decisions for either accepting or rejecting a marginal living donor. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2721608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27216082009-08-29 Marginal kidney donor Gopalakrishnan, Ganesh Gourabathini, Siva Prasad Indian J Urol Symposium Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for a medically eligible patient with end stage renal disease. The number of renal transplants has increased rapidly over the last two decades. However, the demand for organs has increased even more. This disparity between the availability of organs and waitlisted patients for transplants has forced many transplant centers across the world to use marginal kidneys and donors. We performed a Medline search to establish the current status of marginal kidney donors in the world. Transplant programs using marginal deceased renal grafts is well established. The focus is now on efforts to improve their results. Utilization of non-heart-beating donors is still in a plateau phase and comprises a minor percentage of deceased donations. The main concern is primary non-function of the renal graft apart from legal and ethical issues. Transplants with living donors outnumbered cadaveric transplants at many centers in the last decade. There has been an increased use of marginal living kidney donors with some acceptable medical risks. Our primary concern is the safety of the living donor. There is not enough scientific data available to quantify the risks involved for such donation. The definition of marginal living donor is still not clear and there are no uniform recommendations. The decision must be tailored to each donor who in turn should be actively involved at all levels of the decision-making process. In the current circumstances, our responsibility is very crucial in making decisions for either accepting or rejecting a marginal living donor. Medknow Publications 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC2721608/ /pubmed/19718332 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.33726 Text en © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Symposium Gopalakrishnan, Ganesh Gourabathini, Siva Prasad Marginal kidney donor |
title | Marginal kidney donor |
title_full | Marginal kidney donor |
title_fullStr | Marginal kidney donor |
title_full_unstemmed | Marginal kidney donor |
title_short | Marginal kidney donor |
title_sort | marginal kidney donor |
topic | Symposium |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2721608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19718332 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.33726 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gopalakrishnanganesh marginalkidneydonor AT gourabathinisivaprasad marginalkidneydonor |