Cargando…

The Genome Response to Artificial Selection: A Case Study in Dairy Cattle

Dairy cattle breeds have been subjected over the last fifty years to intense artificial selection towards improvement of milk production traits. In this study, we performed a whole genome scan for differentiation using 42,486 SNPs in the three major French dairy cattle breeds (Holstein, Normande and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flori, Laurence, Fritz, Sébastien, Jaffrézic, Florence, Boussaha, Mekki, Gut, Ivo, Heath, Simon, Foulley, Jean-Louis, Gautier, Mathieu
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2722727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19672461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006595
_version_ 1782170333433823232
author Flori, Laurence
Fritz, Sébastien
Jaffrézic, Florence
Boussaha, Mekki
Gut, Ivo
Heath, Simon
Foulley, Jean-Louis
Gautier, Mathieu
author_facet Flori, Laurence
Fritz, Sébastien
Jaffrézic, Florence
Boussaha, Mekki
Gut, Ivo
Heath, Simon
Foulley, Jean-Louis
Gautier, Mathieu
author_sort Flori, Laurence
collection PubMed
description Dairy cattle breeds have been subjected over the last fifty years to intense artificial selection towards improvement of milk production traits. In this study, we performed a whole genome scan for differentiation using 42,486 SNPs in the three major French dairy cattle breeds (Holstein, Normande and Montbéliarde) to identify the main physiological pathways and regions which were affected by this selection. After analyzing the population structure, we estimated F(ST) within and across the three breeds for each SNP under a pure drift model. We further considered two different strategies to evaluate the effect of selection at the genome level. First, smoothing F(ST) values over each chromosome with a local variable bandwidth kernel estimator allowed identifying 13 highly significant regions subjected to strong and/or recent positive selection. Some of them contained genes within which causal variants with strong effect on milk production traits (GHR) or coloration (MC1R) have already been reported. To go further in the interpretation of the observed signatures of selection we subsequently concentrated on the annotation of differentiated genes defined according to the F(ST) value of SNPs localized close or within them. To that end we performed a comprehensive network analysis which suggested a central role of somatotropic and gonadotropic axes in the response to selection. Altogether, these observations shed light on the antagonism, at the genome level, between milk production and reproduction traits in highly producing dairy cows.
format Text
id pubmed-2722727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27227272009-08-12 The Genome Response to Artificial Selection: A Case Study in Dairy Cattle Flori, Laurence Fritz, Sébastien Jaffrézic, Florence Boussaha, Mekki Gut, Ivo Heath, Simon Foulley, Jean-Louis Gautier, Mathieu PLoS One Research Article Dairy cattle breeds have been subjected over the last fifty years to intense artificial selection towards improvement of milk production traits. In this study, we performed a whole genome scan for differentiation using 42,486 SNPs in the three major French dairy cattle breeds (Holstein, Normande and Montbéliarde) to identify the main physiological pathways and regions which were affected by this selection. After analyzing the population structure, we estimated F(ST) within and across the three breeds for each SNP under a pure drift model. We further considered two different strategies to evaluate the effect of selection at the genome level. First, smoothing F(ST) values over each chromosome with a local variable bandwidth kernel estimator allowed identifying 13 highly significant regions subjected to strong and/or recent positive selection. Some of them contained genes within which causal variants with strong effect on milk production traits (GHR) or coloration (MC1R) have already been reported. To go further in the interpretation of the observed signatures of selection we subsequently concentrated on the annotation of differentiated genes defined according to the F(ST) value of SNPs localized close or within them. To that end we performed a comprehensive network analysis which suggested a central role of somatotropic and gonadotropic axes in the response to selection. Altogether, these observations shed light on the antagonism, at the genome level, between milk production and reproduction traits in highly producing dairy cows. Public Library of Science 2009-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2722727/ /pubmed/19672461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006595 Text en Flori et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Flori, Laurence
Fritz, Sébastien
Jaffrézic, Florence
Boussaha, Mekki
Gut, Ivo
Heath, Simon
Foulley, Jean-Louis
Gautier, Mathieu
The Genome Response to Artificial Selection: A Case Study in Dairy Cattle
title The Genome Response to Artificial Selection: A Case Study in Dairy Cattle
title_full The Genome Response to Artificial Selection: A Case Study in Dairy Cattle
title_fullStr The Genome Response to Artificial Selection: A Case Study in Dairy Cattle
title_full_unstemmed The Genome Response to Artificial Selection: A Case Study in Dairy Cattle
title_short The Genome Response to Artificial Selection: A Case Study in Dairy Cattle
title_sort genome response to artificial selection: a case study in dairy cattle
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2722727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19672461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006595
work_keys_str_mv AT florilaurence thegenomeresponsetoartificialselectionacasestudyindairycattle
AT fritzsebastien thegenomeresponsetoartificialselectionacasestudyindairycattle
AT jaffrezicflorence thegenomeresponsetoartificialselectionacasestudyindairycattle
AT boussahamekki thegenomeresponsetoartificialselectionacasestudyindairycattle
AT gutivo thegenomeresponsetoartificialselectionacasestudyindairycattle
AT heathsimon thegenomeresponsetoartificialselectionacasestudyindairycattle
AT foulleyjeanlouis thegenomeresponsetoartificialselectionacasestudyindairycattle
AT gautiermathieu thegenomeresponsetoartificialselectionacasestudyindairycattle
AT florilaurence genomeresponsetoartificialselectionacasestudyindairycattle
AT fritzsebastien genomeresponsetoartificialselectionacasestudyindairycattle
AT jaffrezicflorence genomeresponsetoartificialselectionacasestudyindairycattle
AT boussahamekki genomeresponsetoartificialselectionacasestudyindairycattle
AT gutivo genomeresponsetoartificialselectionacasestudyindairycattle
AT heathsimon genomeresponsetoartificialselectionacasestudyindairycattle
AT foulleyjeanlouis genomeresponsetoartificialselectionacasestudyindairycattle
AT gautiermathieu genomeresponsetoartificialselectionacasestudyindairycattle