Cargando…

Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication

Human communication has been described as involving the coding-decoding of a conventional symbol system, which could be supported by parts of the human motor system (i.e. the “mirror neurons system”). However, this view does not explain how these conventions could develop in the first place. Here we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noordzij, Matthijs L., Newman-Norlund, Sarah E., de Ruiter, Jan Peter, Hagoort, Peter, Levinson, Stephen C., Toni, Ivan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2722906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19668699
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.014.2009
_version_ 1782170341803556864
author Noordzij, Matthijs L.
Newman-Norlund, Sarah E.
de Ruiter, Jan Peter
Hagoort, Peter
Levinson, Stephen C.
Toni, Ivan
author_facet Noordzij, Matthijs L.
Newman-Norlund, Sarah E.
de Ruiter, Jan Peter
Hagoort, Peter
Levinson, Stephen C.
Toni, Ivan
author_sort Noordzij, Matthijs L.
collection PubMed
description Human communication has been described as involving the coding-decoding of a conventional symbol system, which could be supported by parts of the human motor system (i.e. the “mirror neurons system”). However, this view does not explain how these conventions could develop in the first place. Here we target the neglected but crucial issue of how people organize their non-verbal behavior to communicate a given intention without pre-established conventions. We have measured behavioral and brain responses in pairs of subjects during communicative exchanges occurring in a real, interactive, on-line social context. In two fMRI studies, we found robust evidence that planning new communicative actions (by a sender) and recognizing the communicative intention of the same actions (by a receiver) relied on spatially overlapping portions of their brains (the right posterior superior temporal sulcus). The response of this region was lateralized to the right hemisphere, modulated by the ambiguity in meaning of the communicative acts, but not by their sensorimotor complexity. These results indicate that the sender of a communicative signal uses his own intention recognition system to make a prediction of the intention recognition performed by the receiver. This finding supports the notion that our communicative abilities are distinct from both sensorimotor processes and language abilities.
format Text
id pubmed-2722906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27229062009-08-10 Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication Noordzij, Matthijs L. Newman-Norlund, Sarah E. de Ruiter, Jan Peter Hagoort, Peter Levinson, Stephen C. Toni, Ivan Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Human communication has been described as involving the coding-decoding of a conventional symbol system, which could be supported by parts of the human motor system (i.e. the “mirror neurons system”). However, this view does not explain how these conventions could develop in the first place. Here we target the neglected but crucial issue of how people organize their non-verbal behavior to communicate a given intention without pre-established conventions. We have measured behavioral and brain responses in pairs of subjects during communicative exchanges occurring in a real, interactive, on-line social context. In two fMRI studies, we found robust evidence that planning new communicative actions (by a sender) and recognizing the communicative intention of the same actions (by a receiver) relied on spatially overlapping portions of their brains (the right posterior superior temporal sulcus). The response of this region was lateralized to the right hemisphere, modulated by the ambiguity in meaning of the communicative acts, but not by their sensorimotor complexity. These results indicate that the sender of a communicative signal uses his own intention recognition system to make a prediction of the intention recognition performed by the receiver. This finding supports the notion that our communicative abilities are distinct from both sensorimotor processes and language abilities. Frontiers Research Foundation 2009-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2722906/ /pubmed/19668699 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.014.2009 Text en Copyright © 2009 Noordzij, Newman-Norlund, de Ruiter, Hagoort, Levinson and Toni. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Noordzij, Matthijs L.
Newman-Norlund, Sarah E.
de Ruiter, Jan Peter
Hagoort, Peter
Levinson, Stephen C.
Toni, Ivan
Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication
title Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication
title_full Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication
title_fullStr Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication
title_full_unstemmed Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication
title_short Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication
title_sort brain mechanisms underlying human communication
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2722906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19668699
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.014.2009
work_keys_str_mv AT noordzijmatthijsl brainmechanismsunderlyinghumancommunication
AT newmannorlundsarahe brainmechanismsunderlyinghumancommunication
AT deruiterjanpeter brainmechanismsunderlyinghumancommunication
AT hagoortpeter brainmechanismsunderlyinghumancommunication
AT levinsonstephenc brainmechanismsunderlyinghumancommunication
AT toniivan brainmechanismsunderlyinghumancommunication