Cargando…
Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication
Human communication has been described as involving the coding-decoding of a conventional symbol system, which could be supported by parts of the human motor system (i.e. the “mirror neurons system”). However, this view does not explain how these conventions could develop in the first place. Here we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2722906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19668699 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.014.2009 |
_version_ | 1782170341803556864 |
---|---|
author | Noordzij, Matthijs L. Newman-Norlund, Sarah E. de Ruiter, Jan Peter Hagoort, Peter Levinson, Stephen C. Toni, Ivan |
author_facet | Noordzij, Matthijs L. Newman-Norlund, Sarah E. de Ruiter, Jan Peter Hagoort, Peter Levinson, Stephen C. Toni, Ivan |
author_sort | Noordzij, Matthijs L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Human communication has been described as involving the coding-decoding of a conventional symbol system, which could be supported by parts of the human motor system (i.e. the “mirror neurons system”). However, this view does not explain how these conventions could develop in the first place. Here we target the neglected but crucial issue of how people organize their non-verbal behavior to communicate a given intention without pre-established conventions. We have measured behavioral and brain responses in pairs of subjects during communicative exchanges occurring in a real, interactive, on-line social context. In two fMRI studies, we found robust evidence that planning new communicative actions (by a sender) and recognizing the communicative intention of the same actions (by a receiver) relied on spatially overlapping portions of their brains (the right posterior superior temporal sulcus). The response of this region was lateralized to the right hemisphere, modulated by the ambiguity in meaning of the communicative acts, but not by their sensorimotor complexity. These results indicate that the sender of a communicative signal uses his own intention recognition system to make a prediction of the intention recognition performed by the receiver. This finding supports the notion that our communicative abilities are distinct from both sensorimotor processes and language abilities. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2722906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27229062009-08-10 Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication Noordzij, Matthijs L. Newman-Norlund, Sarah E. de Ruiter, Jan Peter Hagoort, Peter Levinson, Stephen C. Toni, Ivan Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Human communication has been described as involving the coding-decoding of a conventional symbol system, which could be supported by parts of the human motor system (i.e. the “mirror neurons system”). However, this view does not explain how these conventions could develop in the first place. Here we target the neglected but crucial issue of how people organize their non-verbal behavior to communicate a given intention without pre-established conventions. We have measured behavioral and brain responses in pairs of subjects during communicative exchanges occurring in a real, interactive, on-line social context. In two fMRI studies, we found robust evidence that planning new communicative actions (by a sender) and recognizing the communicative intention of the same actions (by a receiver) relied on spatially overlapping portions of their brains (the right posterior superior temporal sulcus). The response of this region was lateralized to the right hemisphere, modulated by the ambiguity in meaning of the communicative acts, but not by their sensorimotor complexity. These results indicate that the sender of a communicative signal uses his own intention recognition system to make a prediction of the intention recognition performed by the receiver. This finding supports the notion that our communicative abilities are distinct from both sensorimotor processes and language abilities. Frontiers Research Foundation 2009-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2722906/ /pubmed/19668699 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.014.2009 Text en Copyright © 2009 Noordzij, Newman-Norlund, de Ruiter, Hagoort, Levinson and Toni. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Noordzij, Matthijs L. Newman-Norlund, Sarah E. de Ruiter, Jan Peter Hagoort, Peter Levinson, Stephen C. Toni, Ivan Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication |
title | Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication |
title_full | Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication |
title_fullStr | Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication |
title_full_unstemmed | Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication |
title_short | Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication |
title_sort | brain mechanisms underlying human communication |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2722906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19668699 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.014.2009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noordzijmatthijsl brainmechanismsunderlyinghumancommunication AT newmannorlundsarahe brainmechanismsunderlyinghumancommunication AT deruiterjanpeter brainmechanismsunderlyinghumancommunication AT hagoortpeter brainmechanismsunderlyinghumancommunication AT levinsonstephenc brainmechanismsunderlyinghumancommunication AT toniivan brainmechanismsunderlyinghumancommunication |