Cargando…

Polychromatic immunophenotypic characterization of T cell profiles among HIV-infected patients experiencing immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS)

OBJECTIVE: To immunophenotype CD4(+ )and CD8(+ )T cell sub-populations in HIV-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). DESIGN: Nested case-control immunological study. METHODS: ART-naïve HIV-infected patients were prospectively observed for IRIS during the first 6 months of ART...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murdoch, David M, Suchard, Melinda S, Venter, Willem DF, Mhlangu, Patrick, Ottinger, Janet S, Feldman, Charles, Van Rie, Annelies, Glencross, Deborah K, Stevens, Wendy S, Weinhold, Kent J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2723132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19607684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-6405-6-16
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To immunophenotype CD4(+ )and CD8(+ )T cell sub-populations in HIV-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). DESIGN: Nested case-control immunological study. METHODS: ART-naïve HIV-infected patients were prospectively observed for IRIS during the first 6 months of ART. Twenty-two IRIS cases and 22 ART-duration matched controls were sampled for T cell immunophenotyping. RESULTS: IRIS cases demonstrated significantly lower CD4 cell counts compared to controls (baseline: 79 versus 142, p = 0.02; enrollment: 183 versus 263, p = 0.05, respectively) with no differences in HIV RNA levels. Within CD4(+)T cells, cases exhibited more of an effector memory phenotype compared to controls (40.8 versus 27.0%, p = 0.20), while controls trended towards a central memory phenotype (43.8 versus 30.8%, p = 0.07). Within CD8(+ )T cells, controls exhibited more central memory (13.9 versus 7.81%, p = 0.01, respectively) and effector (13.2 versus 8.8%, p = 0.04, respectively) phenotypes compared to cases, whereas cases demonstrated more terminal effectors than controls (28.8 versus 15.1%, p = 0.05). Cases demonstrated increased activation of CD8(+ )T cell effector memory, terminal effector, and effector subsets than controls (p = 0.04, 0.02, and 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: CD4(+ )and CD8(+ )T cell subset maturational phenotypes were heterogeneous among IRIS cases and controls. However, IRIS cases demonstrated significant increases in activation of CD8(+ )T cell effector subpopulations.