Cargando…
Cavities in protein–DNA and protein–RNA interfaces
An analysis of cavities present in protein–DNA and protein–RNA complexes is presented. In terms of the number of cavities and their total volume, the interfaces formed in these complexes are akin to those in transient protein–protein heterocomplexes. With homodimeric proteins protein–DNA interfaces...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2724294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19494181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp488 |
_version_ | 1782170399769886720 |
---|---|
author | Sonavane, Shrihari Chakrabarti, Pinak |
author_facet | Sonavane, Shrihari Chakrabarti, Pinak |
author_sort | Sonavane, Shrihari |
collection | PubMed |
description | An analysis of cavities present in protein–DNA and protein–RNA complexes is presented. In terms of the number of cavities and their total volume, the interfaces formed in these complexes are akin to those in transient protein–protein heterocomplexes. With homodimeric proteins protein–DNA interfaces may contain cavities involving both the protein subunits and DNA, and these are more than twice as large as cavities involving a single protein subunit and DNA. A parameter, cavity index, measuring the degree of surface complementarity, indicates that the packing of atoms in protein–protein/DNA/RNA is very similar, but it is about two times less efficient in the permanent interfaces formed between subunits in homodimers. As within the tertiary structure and protein–protein interfaces, protein–DNA interfaces have a higher inclination to be lined by β-sheet residues; from the DNA side, base atoms, in particular those in minor grooves, have a higher tendency to be located in cavities. The larger cavities tend to be less spherical and solvated. A small fraction of water molecules are found to mediate hydrogen-bond interactions with both the components, suggesting their primary role is to fill in the void left due to the local non-complementary nature of the surface patches. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2724294 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27242942009-08-18 Cavities in protein–DNA and protein–RNA interfaces Sonavane, Shrihari Chakrabarti, Pinak Nucleic Acids Res Computational Biology An analysis of cavities present in protein–DNA and protein–RNA complexes is presented. In terms of the number of cavities and their total volume, the interfaces formed in these complexes are akin to those in transient protein–protein heterocomplexes. With homodimeric proteins protein–DNA interfaces may contain cavities involving both the protein subunits and DNA, and these are more than twice as large as cavities involving a single protein subunit and DNA. A parameter, cavity index, measuring the degree of surface complementarity, indicates that the packing of atoms in protein–protein/DNA/RNA is very similar, but it is about two times less efficient in the permanent interfaces formed between subunits in homodimers. As within the tertiary structure and protein–protein interfaces, protein–DNA interfaces have a higher inclination to be lined by β-sheet residues; from the DNA side, base atoms, in particular those in minor grooves, have a higher tendency to be located in cavities. The larger cavities tend to be less spherical and solvated. A small fraction of water molecules are found to mediate hydrogen-bond interactions with both the components, suggesting their primary role is to fill in the void left due to the local non-complementary nature of the surface patches. Oxford University Press 2009-08 2009-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2724294/ /pubmed/19494181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp488 Text en © 2009 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Computational Biology Sonavane, Shrihari Chakrabarti, Pinak Cavities in protein–DNA and protein–RNA interfaces |
title | Cavities in protein–DNA and protein–RNA interfaces |
title_full | Cavities in protein–DNA and protein–RNA interfaces |
title_fullStr | Cavities in protein–DNA and protein–RNA interfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | Cavities in protein–DNA and protein–RNA interfaces |
title_short | Cavities in protein–DNA and protein–RNA interfaces |
title_sort | cavities in protein–dna and protein–rna interfaces |
topic | Computational Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2724294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19494181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp488 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sonavaneshrihari cavitiesinproteindnaandproteinrnainterfaces AT chakrabartipinak cavitiesinproteindnaandproteinrnainterfaces |