Cargando…
Design and validity of a questionnaire to assess sexuality in pregnant women
BACKGROUND: A review of validated methods for assessing female sexual dysfunction and a review of male and female sexual dysfunction did not refer to any specific questionnaire for evaluating sexuality during pregnancy. A study was performed at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Botucatu Me...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2724386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19640270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-6-12 |
_version_ | 1782170406762840064 |
---|---|
author | Rudge, Cibele VC Calderon, Iracema MP Dias, Adriano Lopes, Gerson P Barbosa, Angélica P Maestá, Izildinha Odland, Jon Øyvind Rudge, Marilza VC |
author_facet | Rudge, Cibele VC Calderon, Iracema MP Dias, Adriano Lopes, Gerson P Barbosa, Angélica P Maestá, Izildinha Odland, Jon Øyvind Rudge, Marilza VC |
author_sort | Rudge, Cibele VC |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A review of validated methods for assessing female sexual dysfunction and a review of male and female sexual dysfunction did not refer to any specific questionnaire for evaluating sexuality during pregnancy. A study was performed at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, Brazil to design and validate a pregnancy sexuality questionnaire, the Pregnancy Sexual Response Inventory (PSRI). METHODS: Women with a singleton pregnancy between 10 and 35 weeks of gestation were randomly recruited. There were five phases in the development of the PSRI: (1) item selection; (2) item development; (3) determination of internal consistency, reliability and convergence; (4) content validity; and (5) determination of inter-interviewer reliability. Internal consistency and reliability were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Inter-interviewer reliability was assessed by evaluating the responses of 18 academics at various institutions, using Kappa Index and Student t test. RESULTS: Good internal consistency and reliability were obtained (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.79). Among the 18 academics, 13 totally agreed (K = 1.0), three partially agreed (K = 0.67) and two disagreed (K = 0.33) with the proposed questions. Comparisons of the mean PSRI domain scores made between the primary investigators and the other interviewers showed no significant differences in all domains (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: PSRI is a new validated instrument for evaluating sexuality and sexual activity and related health concerns during pregnancy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2724386 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27243862009-08-11 Design and validity of a questionnaire to assess sexuality in pregnant women Rudge, Cibele VC Calderon, Iracema MP Dias, Adriano Lopes, Gerson P Barbosa, Angélica P Maestá, Izildinha Odland, Jon Øyvind Rudge, Marilza VC Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: A review of validated methods for assessing female sexual dysfunction and a review of male and female sexual dysfunction did not refer to any specific questionnaire for evaluating sexuality during pregnancy. A study was performed at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, Brazil to design and validate a pregnancy sexuality questionnaire, the Pregnancy Sexual Response Inventory (PSRI). METHODS: Women with a singleton pregnancy between 10 and 35 weeks of gestation were randomly recruited. There were five phases in the development of the PSRI: (1) item selection; (2) item development; (3) determination of internal consistency, reliability and convergence; (4) content validity; and (5) determination of inter-interviewer reliability. Internal consistency and reliability were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Inter-interviewer reliability was assessed by evaluating the responses of 18 academics at various institutions, using Kappa Index and Student t test. RESULTS: Good internal consistency and reliability were obtained (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.79). Among the 18 academics, 13 totally agreed (K = 1.0), three partially agreed (K = 0.67) and two disagreed (K = 0.33) with the proposed questions. Comparisons of the mean PSRI domain scores made between the primary investigators and the other interviewers showed no significant differences in all domains (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: PSRI is a new validated instrument for evaluating sexuality and sexual activity and related health concerns during pregnancy. BioMed Central 2009-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2724386/ /pubmed/19640270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-6-12 Text en Copyright © 2009 Rudge et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Rudge, Cibele VC Calderon, Iracema MP Dias, Adriano Lopes, Gerson P Barbosa, Angélica P Maestá, Izildinha Odland, Jon Øyvind Rudge, Marilza VC Design and validity of a questionnaire to assess sexuality in pregnant women |
title | Design and validity of a questionnaire to assess sexuality in pregnant women |
title_full | Design and validity of a questionnaire to assess sexuality in pregnant women |
title_fullStr | Design and validity of a questionnaire to assess sexuality in pregnant women |
title_full_unstemmed | Design and validity of a questionnaire to assess sexuality in pregnant women |
title_short | Design and validity of a questionnaire to assess sexuality in pregnant women |
title_sort | design and validity of a questionnaire to assess sexuality in pregnant women |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2724386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19640270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-6-12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rudgecibelevc designandvalidityofaquestionnairetoassesssexualityinpregnantwomen AT calderoniracemamp designandvalidityofaquestionnairetoassesssexualityinpregnantwomen AT diasadriano designandvalidityofaquestionnairetoassesssexualityinpregnantwomen AT lopesgersonp designandvalidityofaquestionnairetoassesssexualityinpregnantwomen AT barbosaangelicap designandvalidityofaquestionnairetoassesssexualityinpregnantwomen AT maestaizildinha designandvalidityofaquestionnairetoassesssexualityinpregnantwomen AT odlandjonøyvind designandvalidityofaquestionnairetoassesssexualityinpregnantwomen AT rudgemarilzavc designandvalidityofaquestionnairetoassesssexualityinpregnantwomen |