Cargando…

Nosologomania: DSM & Karl Jaspers' Critique of Kraepelin

Emil Kraepelin's nosology has been reinvented, for better or worse. In the United States, the rise of the neo-Kraepelinian nosology of DSM-III resuscitated Kraepelin's work but also differed from many of his ideas, especially his overtly biological ontology. This neo-Kraepelinian system ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ghaemi, S Nassir
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2724409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19627606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-4-10
_version_ 1782170411051515904
author Ghaemi, S Nassir
author_facet Ghaemi, S Nassir
author_sort Ghaemi, S Nassir
collection PubMed
description Emil Kraepelin's nosology has been reinvented, for better or worse. In the United States, the rise of the neo-Kraepelinian nosology of DSM-III resuscitated Kraepelin's work but also differed from many of his ideas, especially his overtly biological ontology. This neo-Kraepelinian system has led to concerns regarding overdiagnosis of psychiatric syndromes ("nosologomania") and perhaps scientifically ill-founded psychopharmacological treatment for presumed neo-Kraepelinian syndromes. In the early 20(th )century, Karl Jaspers provided unique insights into Kraepelin's work, and Jaspers even proposed an alternate nosology which, though influenced by Kraepelin, also introduced the concept of ideal types. Jaspers' critique of Kraepelin may help us reformulate our current neo-Kraepelinian nosology for the better.
format Text
id pubmed-2724409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27244092009-08-11 Nosologomania: DSM & Karl Jaspers' Critique of Kraepelin Ghaemi, S Nassir Philos Ethics Humanit Med Review Emil Kraepelin's nosology has been reinvented, for better or worse. In the United States, the rise of the neo-Kraepelinian nosology of DSM-III resuscitated Kraepelin's work but also differed from many of his ideas, especially his overtly biological ontology. This neo-Kraepelinian system has led to concerns regarding overdiagnosis of psychiatric syndromes ("nosologomania") and perhaps scientifically ill-founded psychopharmacological treatment for presumed neo-Kraepelinian syndromes. In the early 20(th )century, Karl Jaspers provided unique insights into Kraepelin's work, and Jaspers even proposed an alternate nosology which, though influenced by Kraepelin, also introduced the concept of ideal types. Jaspers' critique of Kraepelin may help us reformulate our current neo-Kraepelinian nosology for the better. BioMed Central 2009-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2724409/ /pubmed/19627606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-4-10 Text en Copyright © 2009 Ghaemi; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Ghaemi, S Nassir
Nosologomania: DSM & Karl Jaspers' Critique of Kraepelin
title Nosologomania: DSM & Karl Jaspers' Critique of Kraepelin
title_full Nosologomania: DSM & Karl Jaspers' Critique of Kraepelin
title_fullStr Nosologomania: DSM & Karl Jaspers' Critique of Kraepelin
title_full_unstemmed Nosologomania: DSM & Karl Jaspers' Critique of Kraepelin
title_short Nosologomania: DSM & Karl Jaspers' Critique of Kraepelin
title_sort nosologomania: dsm & karl jaspers' critique of kraepelin
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2724409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19627606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-4-10
work_keys_str_mv AT ghaemisnassir nosologomaniadsmkarljasperscritiqueofkraepelin