Cargando…
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers with U-CLIP(®)
BACKGROUND: The literature established that, in patients without Boey's risk factors, laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers, compared to open repair, is associated to lower wound infection rate, less analgesic use, reduction in post operative pain, shorter hospital stay. Some of the m...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2726127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19640268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-4-28 |
_version_ | 1782170568535048192 |
---|---|
author | Guglielminotti, Piero Bini, Roberto Fontana, Diego Leli, Renzo |
author_facet | Guglielminotti, Piero Bini, Roberto Fontana, Diego Leli, Renzo |
author_sort | Guglielminotti, Piero |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The literature established that, in patients without Boey's risk factors, laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers, compared to open repair, is associated to lower wound infection rate, less analgesic use, reduction in post operative pain, shorter hospital stay. Some of the main drawbacks are length of operative time and laparoscopic surgeon's experience in intracorporeal knotting. We, for first, report our preliminary experience of perforated peptic ulcers' laparoscopic repair using Medtronic U-Clip(®). METHODS: From January 2008 to June 2008 we performed laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers using Medtronic U-Clip(® )in 10 consecutive patients (6 men and 4 women, from 20 to 65 years-old of age). All the patients presented with iuxtapyloric perforated peptic ulcer, not greater than 10 mm, without signs of sepsis, free from major illnesses. The mini-invasive procedure was performed both by skilled and non-skilled laparoscopic surgeons under experts' surveillance. After it was recognized, perforation was sutured using U-Clip(® )in a full-thickness manner. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We reported no surgical complications in the peri-operative period. The clinical outcome and time needed to perform the intervention didn't change between skilled and non-skilled surgeons. The follow-up at 30 days was good. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the anastomotic device U-Clip(® )simplifies laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer, avoiding the need to perform knots and making the procedure safe and easier. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2726127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27261272009-08-13 Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers with U-CLIP(®) Guglielminotti, Piero Bini, Roberto Fontana, Diego Leli, Renzo World J Emerg Surg Methodology BACKGROUND: The literature established that, in patients without Boey's risk factors, laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers, compared to open repair, is associated to lower wound infection rate, less analgesic use, reduction in post operative pain, shorter hospital stay. Some of the main drawbacks are length of operative time and laparoscopic surgeon's experience in intracorporeal knotting. We, for first, report our preliminary experience of perforated peptic ulcers' laparoscopic repair using Medtronic U-Clip(®). METHODS: From January 2008 to June 2008 we performed laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers using Medtronic U-Clip(® )in 10 consecutive patients (6 men and 4 women, from 20 to 65 years-old of age). All the patients presented with iuxtapyloric perforated peptic ulcer, not greater than 10 mm, without signs of sepsis, free from major illnesses. The mini-invasive procedure was performed both by skilled and non-skilled laparoscopic surgeons under experts' surveillance. After it was recognized, perforation was sutured using U-Clip(® )in a full-thickness manner. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We reported no surgical complications in the peri-operative period. The clinical outcome and time needed to perform the intervention didn't change between skilled and non-skilled surgeons. The follow-up at 30 days was good. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the anastomotic device U-Clip(® )simplifies laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer, avoiding the need to perform knots and making the procedure safe and easier. BioMed Central 2009-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2726127/ /pubmed/19640268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-4-28 Text en Copyright © 2009 Guglielminotti et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Guglielminotti, Piero Bini, Roberto Fontana, Diego Leli, Renzo Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers with U-CLIP(®) |
title | Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers with U-CLIP(®) |
title_full | Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers with U-CLIP(®) |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers with U-CLIP(®) |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers with U-CLIP(®) |
title_short | Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers with U-CLIP(®) |
title_sort | laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers with u-clip(®) |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2726127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19640268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-4-28 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guglielminottipiero laparoscopicrepairforperforatedpepticulcerswithuclip AT biniroberto laparoscopicrepairforperforatedpepticulcerswithuclip AT fontanadiego laparoscopicrepairforperforatedpepticulcerswithuclip AT lelirenzo laparoscopicrepairforperforatedpepticulcerswithuclip |