Cargando…

Hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: national follow-up study

Objective To assess the risk of venous thrombosis in current users of different types of hormonal contraception, focusing on regimen, oestrogen dose, type of progestogen, and route of administration. Design National cohort study. Setting Denmark, 1995-2005. Participants Danish women aged 15-49 with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lidegaard, Øjvind, Løkkegaard, Ellen, Svendsen, Anne Louise, Agger, Carsten
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2726928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19679613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2890
_version_ 1782170639970336768
author Lidegaard, Øjvind
Løkkegaard, Ellen
Svendsen, Anne Louise
Agger, Carsten
author_facet Lidegaard, Øjvind
Løkkegaard, Ellen
Svendsen, Anne Louise
Agger, Carsten
author_sort Lidegaard, Øjvind
collection PubMed
description Objective To assess the risk of venous thrombosis in current users of different types of hormonal contraception, focusing on regimen, oestrogen dose, type of progestogen, and route of administration. Design National cohort study. Setting Denmark, 1995-2005. Participants Danish women aged 15-49 with no history of cardiovascular or malignant disease. Main outcome measures Adjusted rate ratios for all first time deep venous thrombosis, portal thrombosis, thrombosis of caval vein, thrombosis of renal vein, unspecified deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism during the study period. Results 10.4 million woman years were recorded, 3.3 million woman years in receipt of oral contraceptives. In total, 4213 venous thrombotic events were observed, 2045 in current users of oral contraceptives. The overall absolute risk of venous thrombosis per 10 000 woman years in non-users of oral contraceptives was 3.01 and in current users was 6.29. Compared with non-users of combined oral contraceptives the rate ratio of venous thrombembolism in current users decreased with duration of use (<1 year 4.17, 95% confidence interval 3.73 to 4.66, 1-4 years 2.98, 2.73 to 3.26, and >4 years 2.76, 2.53 to 3.02; P<0.001) and with decreasing dose of oestrogen. Compared with oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel and with the same dose of oestrogen and length of use, the rate ratio for oral contraceptives with norethisterone was 0.98 (0.71 to 1.37), with norgestimate 1.19 (0.96 to 1.47), with desogestrel 1.82 (1.49 to 2.22), with gestodene 1.86 (1.59 to 2.18), with drospirenone 1.64 (1.27 to 2.10), and with cyproterone 1.88 (1.47 to 2.42). Compared with non-users of oral contraceptives, the rate ratio for venous thromboembolism in users of progestogen only oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel or norethisterone was 0.59 (0.33 to 1.03) or with 75 μg desogestrel was 1.12 (0.36 to 3.49), and for hormone releasing intrauterine devices was 0.90 (0.64 to 1.26). Conclusion The risk of venous thrombosis in current users of combined oral contraceptives decreases with duration of use and decreasing oestrogen dose. For the same dose of oestrogen and the same length of use, oral contraceptives with desogestrel, gestodene, or drospirenone were associated with a significantly higher risk of venous thrombosis than oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel. Progestogen only pills and hormone releasing intrauterine devices were not associated with any increased risk of venous thrombosis.
format Text
id pubmed-2726928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27269282009-08-14 Hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: national follow-up study Lidegaard, Øjvind Løkkegaard, Ellen Svendsen, Anne Louise Agger, Carsten BMJ Research Objective To assess the risk of venous thrombosis in current users of different types of hormonal contraception, focusing on regimen, oestrogen dose, type of progestogen, and route of administration. Design National cohort study. Setting Denmark, 1995-2005. Participants Danish women aged 15-49 with no history of cardiovascular or malignant disease. Main outcome measures Adjusted rate ratios for all first time deep venous thrombosis, portal thrombosis, thrombosis of caval vein, thrombosis of renal vein, unspecified deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism during the study period. Results 10.4 million woman years were recorded, 3.3 million woman years in receipt of oral contraceptives. In total, 4213 venous thrombotic events were observed, 2045 in current users of oral contraceptives. The overall absolute risk of venous thrombosis per 10 000 woman years in non-users of oral contraceptives was 3.01 and in current users was 6.29. Compared with non-users of combined oral contraceptives the rate ratio of venous thrombembolism in current users decreased with duration of use (<1 year 4.17, 95% confidence interval 3.73 to 4.66, 1-4 years 2.98, 2.73 to 3.26, and >4 years 2.76, 2.53 to 3.02; P<0.001) and with decreasing dose of oestrogen. Compared with oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel and with the same dose of oestrogen and length of use, the rate ratio for oral contraceptives with norethisterone was 0.98 (0.71 to 1.37), with norgestimate 1.19 (0.96 to 1.47), with desogestrel 1.82 (1.49 to 2.22), with gestodene 1.86 (1.59 to 2.18), with drospirenone 1.64 (1.27 to 2.10), and with cyproterone 1.88 (1.47 to 2.42). Compared with non-users of oral contraceptives, the rate ratio for venous thromboembolism in users of progestogen only oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel or norethisterone was 0.59 (0.33 to 1.03) or with 75 μg desogestrel was 1.12 (0.36 to 3.49), and for hormone releasing intrauterine devices was 0.90 (0.64 to 1.26). Conclusion The risk of venous thrombosis in current users of combined oral contraceptives decreases with duration of use and decreasing oestrogen dose. For the same dose of oestrogen and the same length of use, oral contraceptives with desogestrel, gestodene, or drospirenone were associated with a significantly higher risk of venous thrombosis than oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel. Progestogen only pills and hormone releasing intrauterine devices were not associated with any increased risk of venous thrombosis. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2726928/ /pubmed/19679613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2890 Text en This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Lidegaard, Øjvind
Løkkegaard, Ellen
Svendsen, Anne Louise
Agger, Carsten
Hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: national follow-up study
title Hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: national follow-up study
title_full Hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: national follow-up study
title_fullStr Hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: national follow-up study
title_full_unstemmed Hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: national follow-up study
title_short Hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: national follow-up study
title_sort hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: national follow-up study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2726928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19679613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2890
work_keys_str_mv AT lidegaardøjvind hormonalcontraceptionandriskofvenousthromboembolismnationalfollowupstudy
AT løkkegaardellen hormonalcontraceptionandriskofvenousthromboembolismnationalfollowupstudy
AT svendsenannelouise hormonalcontraceptionandriskofvenousthromboembolismnationalfollowupstudy
AT aggercarsten hormonalcontraceptionandriskofvenousthromboembolismnationalfollowupstudy