Cargando…

Is research working for you? validating a tool to examine the capacity of health organizations to use research

BACKGROUND: 'Is research working for you? A self-assessment tool and discussion guide for health services management and policy organizations', developed by the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, is a tool that can help organizations understand their capacity to acquire, assess,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kothari, Anita, Edwards, Nancy, Hamel, Nadia, Judd, Maria
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2727486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19627601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-46
_version_ 1782170675802275840
author Kothari, Anita
Edwards, Nancy
Hamel, Nadia
Judd, Maria
author_facet Kothari, Anita
Edwards, Nancy
Hamel, Nadia
Judd, Maria
author_sort Kothari, Anita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: 'Is research working for you? A self-assessment tool and discussion guide for health services management and policy organizations', developed by the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, is a tool that can help organizations understand their capacity to acquire, assess, adapt, and apply research. Objectives were to: determine whether the tool demonstrated response variability; describe how the tool differentiated between organizations that were known to be lower-end or higher-end research users; and describe the potential usability of the tool. METHODS: Thirty-two focus groups were conducted among four sectors of Canadian health organizations. In the first hour of the focus group, participants individually completed the tool and then derived a group consensus ranking on items. In the second hour, the facilitator asked about overall impressions of the tool, to identify insights that emerged during the review of items on the tool and to elicit comments on research utilization. Discussion data were analyzed qualitatively, and individual and consensus item scores were analyzed using descriptive and non-parametric statistics. RESULTS: The tool demonstrated good usability and strong response variability. Differences between higher-end and lower-end research use organizations on scores suggested that this tool has adequate discriminant validity. The group discussion based on the tool was the more useful aspect of the exercise, rather than the actual score assigned. CONCLUSION: The tool can serve as a catalyst for an important discussion about research use at the organizational level; such a discussion, in and of itself, demonstrates potential as an intervention to encourage processes and supports for research translation.
format Text
id pubmed-2727486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27274862009-08-15 Is research working for you? validating a tool to examine the capacity of health organizations to use research Kothari, Anita Edwards, Nancy Hamel, Nadia Judd, Maria Implement Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: 'Is research working for you? A self-assessment tool and discussion guide for health services management and policy organizations', developed by the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, is a tool that can help organizations understand their capacity to acquire, assess, adapt, and apply research. Objectives were to: determine whether the tool demonstrated response variability; describe how the tool differentiated between organizations that were known to be lower-end or higher-end research users; and describe the potential usability of the tool. METHODS: Thirty-two focus groups were conducted among four sectors of Canadian health organizations. In the first hour of the focus group, participants individually completed the tool and then derived a group consensus ranking on items. In the second hour, the facilitator asked about overall impressions of the tool, to identify insights that emerged during the review of items on the tool and to elicit comments on research utilization. Discussion data were analyzed qualitatively, and individual and consensus item scores were analyzed using descriptive and non-parametric statistics. RESULTS: The tool demonstrated good usability and strong response variability. Differences between higher-end and lower-end research use organizations on scores suggested that this tool has adequate discriminant validity. The group discussion based on the tool was the more useful aspect of the exercise, rather than the actual score assigned. CONCLUSION: The tool can serve as a catalyst for an important discussion about research use at the organizational level; such a discussion, in and of itself, demonstrates potential as an intervention to encourage processes and supports for research translation. BioMed Central 2009-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2727486/ /pubmed/19627601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-46 Text en Copyright © 2009 Kothari et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kothari, Anita
Edwards, Nancy
Hamel, Nadia
Judd, Maria
Is research working for you? validating a tool to examine the capacity of health organizations to use research
title Is research working for you? validating a tool to examine the capacity of health organizations to use research
title_full Is research working for you? validating a tool to examine the capacity of health organizations to use research
title_fullStr Is research working for you? validating a tool to examine the capacity of health organizations to use research
title_full_unstemmed Is research working for you? validating a tool to examine the capacity of health organizations to use research
title_short Is research working for you? validating a tool to examine the capacity of health organizations to use research
title_sort is research working for you? validating a tool to examine the capacity of health organizations to use research
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2727486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19627601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-46
work_keys_str_mv AT kotharianita isresearchworkingforyouvalidatingatooltoexaminethecapacityofhealthorganizationstouseresearch
AT edwardsnancy isresearchworkingforyouvalidatingatooltoexaminethecapacityofhealthorganizationstouseresearch
AT hamelnadia isresearchworkingforyouvalidatingatooltoexaminethecapacityofhealthorganizationstouseresearch
AT juddmaria isresearchworkingforyouvalidatingatooltoexaminethecapacityofhealthorganizationstouseresearch