Cargando…
Options for accounting carbon sequestration in German forests
BACKGROUND: The Accra climate change talks held from 21–27 August 2008 in Accra, Ghana, were part of an ongoing series of meetings leading up to the Copenhagen meeting in December 2009. During the meeting a set of options for accounting carbon sequestration in forestry on a post-2012 framework was p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2727505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19650896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-4-5 |
_version_ | 1782170680417058816 |
---|---|
author | Krug, Joachim Koehl, Michael Riedel, Thomas Bormann, Kristin Rueter, Sebastian Elsasser, Peter |
author_facet | Krug, Joachim Koehl, Michael Riedel, Thomas Bormann, Kristin Rueter, Sebastian Elsasser, Peter |
author_sort | Krug, Joachim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Accra climate change talks held from 21–27 August 2008 in Accra, Ghana, were part of an ongoing series of meetings leading up to the Copenhagen meeting in December 2009. During the meeting a set of options for accounting carbon sequestration in forestry on a post-2012 framework was presented. The options include gross-net and net-net accounting and approaches for establishing baselines. RESULTS: This article demonstrates the embedded consequences of Accra Accounting Options for the case study of German national GHG accounting. It presents the most current assessment of sequestration rates by forest management for the period 1990 – 2007, provides an outlook of future emissions and removals (up to the year 2042) as related to three different management scenarios, and shows that implementation of some Accra options may reverse sources to sinks, or sinks to sources. CONCLUSION: The results of the study highlight the importance of elaborating an accounting system that would prioritize the climate convention goals, not national preferences. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2727505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27275052009-08-15 Options for accounting carbon sequestration in German forests Krug, Joachim Koehl, Michael Riedel, Thomas Bormann, Kristin Rueter, Sebastian Elsasser, Peter Carbon Balance Manag Research BACKGROUND: The Accra climate change talks held from 21–27 August 2008 in Accra, Ghana, were part of an ongoing series of meetings leading up to the Copenhagen meeting in December 2009. During the meeting a set of options for accounting carbon sequestration in forestry on a post-2012 framework was presented. The options include gross-net and net-net accounting and approaches for establishing baselines. RESULTS: This article demonstrates the embedded consequences of Accra Accounting Options for the case study of German national GHG accounting. It presents the most current assessment of sequestration rates by forest management for the period 1990 – 2007, provides an outlook of future emissions and removals (up to the year 2042) as related to three different management scenarios, and shows that implementation of some Accra options may reverse sources to sinks, or sinks to sources. CONCLUSION: The results of the study highlight the importance of elaborating an accounting system that would prioritize the climate convention goals, not national preferences. BioMed Central 2009-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2727505/ /pubmed/19650896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-4-5 Text en Copyright © 2009 Krug et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Krug, Joachim Koehl, Michael Riedel, Thomas Bormann, Kristin Rueter, Sebastian Elsasser, Peter Options for accounting carbon sequestration in German forests |
title | Options for accounting carbon sequestration in German forests |
title_full | Options for accounting carbon sequestration in German forests |
title_fullStr | Options for accounting carbon sequestration in German forests |
title_full_unstemmed | Options for accounting carbon sequestration in German forests |
title_short | Options for accounting carbon sequestration in German forests |
title_sort | options for accounting carbon sequestration in german forests |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2727505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19650896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-4-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krugjoachim optionsforaccountingcarbonsequestrationingermanforests AT koehlmichael optionsforaccountingcarbonsequestrationingermanforests AT riedelthomas optionsforaccountingcarbonsequestrationingermanforests AT bormannkristin optionsforaccountingcarbonsequestrationingermanforests AT ruetersebastian optionsforaccountingcarbonsequestrationingermanforests AT elsasserpeter optionsforaccountingcarbonsequestrationingermanforests |