Cargando…

A Review of Blood Substitutes: Examining The History, Clinical Trial Results, and Ethics of Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carriers

The complications associated with acquiring and storing whole blood for transfusions have launched substantial efforts to develop a blood substitute. The history of these efforts involves a complicated mixture of science, ethics, and business. This review focuses on clinical trials of the three hemo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jiin-Yu, Scerbo, Michelle, Kramer, George
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2728196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19690667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009000800016
_version_ 1782170726854295552
author Chen, Jiin-Yu
Scerbo, Michelle
Kramer, George
author_facet Chen, Jiin-Yu
Scerbo, Michelle
Kramer, George
author_sort Chen, Jiin-Yu
collection PubMed
description The complications associated with acquiring and storing whole blood for transfusions have launched substantial efforts to develop a blood substitute. The history of these efforts involves a complicated mixture of science, ethics, and business. This review focuses on clinical trials of the three hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers (HBOC) that have progressed to Phase II or III clinical trials: He-mAssist (Baxter; Deerfield, IL, US), PolyHeme (Northfield; Evanston, IL, US), and Hemopure (Biopure; Cambridge, MA, US). Published animal studies and clinical trials carried out in a perioperative setting have demonstrated that these products successfully transport and deliver oxygen, but all may induce hypertension and lead to unexpectedly low cardiac outputs. Overall, these studies suggest that HBOCs resulted in only modest blood saving during and after surgery, no improvement in mortality and an increased incidence of adverse reactions. To date, the results from these perioperative studies have not led to regulatory approval. All three companies instead chose to focus their efforts on large trials of trauma patients in the pre-hospital setting. Baxter abandoned the development of HemAssist after a trial in the U.S. was prematurely halted when the first 100 patients showed significantly increased mortality rates as compared to patients treated with blood products. Northfield’s PolyHeme trial demonstrated a non-significant trend towards increased mortality and a very modest reduction in the subsequent need for blood. The testing of Biopure’s Hemopure for trauma patients has been halted for several years because of FDA concerns over trial design and study justification. Ethical concerns have also been raised regarding the design and implementation of all HBOC clinical trials. Thus, the available evidence suggests that HemAssist, Polyheme, and Hemopure are associated with a significant level of cardiovascular dysfunction. The next generation of HBOCs remains under development.
format Text
id pubmed-2728196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27281962009-08-18 A Review of Blood Substitutes: Examining The History, Clinical Trial Results, and Ethics of Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carriers Chen, Jiin-Yu Scerbo, Michelle Kramer, George Clinics (Sao Paulo) Review The complications associated with acquiring and storing whole blood for transfusions have launched substantial efforts to develop a blood substitute. The history of these efforts involves a complicated mixture of science, ethics, and business. This review focuses on clinical trials of the three hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers (HBOC) that have progressed to Phase II or III clinical trials: He-mAssist (Baxter; Deerfield, IL, US), PolyHeme (Northfield; Evanston, IL, US), and Hemopure (Biopure; Cambridge, MA, US). Published animal studies and clinical trials carried out in a perioperative setting have demonstrated that these products successfully transport and deliver oxygen, but all may induce hypertension and lead to unexpectedly low cardiac outputs. Overall, these studies suggest that HBOCs resulted in only modest blood saving during and after surgery, no improvement in mortality and an increased incidence of adverse reactions. To date, the results from these perioperative studies have not led to regulatory approval. All three companies instead chose to focus their efforts on large trials of trauma patients in the pre-hospital setting. Baxter abandoned the development of HemAssist after a trial in the U.S. was prematurely halted when the first 100 patients showed significantly increased mortality rates as compared to patients treated with blood products. Northfield’s PolyHeme trial demonstrated a non-significant trend towards increased mortality and a very modest reduction in the subsequent need for blood. The testing of Biopure’s Hemopure for trauma patients has been halted for several years because of FDA concerns over trial design and study justification. Ethical concerns have also been raised regarding the design and implementation of all HBOC clinical trials. Thus, the available evidence suggests that HemAssist, Polyheme, and Hemopure are associated with a significant level of cardiovascular dysfunction. The next generation of HBOCs remains under development. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2009-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2728196/ /pubmed/19690667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009000800016 Text en Copyright © 2009 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
spellingShingle Review
Chen, Jiin-Yu
Scerbo, Michelle
Kramer, George
A Review of Blood Substitutes: Examining The History, Clinical Trial Results, and Ethics of Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carriers
title A Review of Blood Substitutes: Examining The History, Clinical Trial Results, and Ethics of Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carriers
title_full A Review of Blood Substitutes: Examining The History, Clinical Trial Results, and Ethics of Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carriers
title_fullStr A Review of Blood Substitutes: Examining The History, Clinical Trial Results, and Ethics of Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carriers
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Blood Substitutes: Examining The History, Clinical Trial Results, and Ethics of Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carriers
title_short A Review of Blood Substitutes: Examining The History, Clinical Trial Results, and Ethics of Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carriers
title_sort review of blood substitutes: examining the history, clinical trial results, and ethics of hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2728196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19690667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009000800016
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjiinyu areviewofbloodsubstitutesexaminingthehistoryclinicaltrialresultsandethicsofhemoglobinbasedoxygencarriers
AT scerbomichelle areviewofbloodsubstitutesexaminingthehistoryclinicaltrialresultsandethicsofhemoglobinbasedoxygencarriers
AT kramergeorge areviewofbloodsubstitutesexaminingthehistoryclinicaltrialresultsandethicsofhemoglobinbasedoxygencarriers
AT chenjiinyu reviewofbloodsubstitutesexaminingthehistoryclinicaltrialresultsandethicsofhemoglobinbasedoxygencarriers
AT scerbomichelle reviewofbloodsubstitutesexaminingthehistoryclinicaltrialresultsandethicsofhemoglobinbasedoxygencarriers
AT kramergeorge reviewofbloodsubstitutesexaminingthehistoryclinicaltrialresultsandethicsofhemoglobinbasedoxygencarriers