Cargando…

Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To quantify the prevalence of incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Data sources Ovid Medline (1950 to May 2008), Embase (1980 to May 2008), and bibliographies of relevant articles. Review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Zoe, Whiteley, William N, Longstreth, W T, Weber, Frank, Lee, Yi-Chung, Tsushima, Yoshito, Alphs, Hannah, Ladd, Susanne C, Warlow, Charles, Wardlaw, Joanna M, Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2728201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19687093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3016
_version_ 1782170728006680576
author Morris, Zoe
Whiteley, William N
Longstreth, W T
Weber, Frank
Lee, Yi-Chung
Tsushima, Yoshito
Alphs, Hannah
Ladd, Susanne C
Warlow, Charles
Wardlaw, Joanna M
Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam
author_facet Morris, Zoe
Whiteley, William N
Longstreth, W T
Weber, Frank
Lee, Yi-Chung
Tsushima, Yoshito
Alphs, Hannah
Ladd, Susanne C
Warlow, Charles
Wardlaw, Joanna M
Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam
author_sort Morris, Zoe
collection PubMed
description Objective To quantify the prevalence of incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Data sources Ovid Medline (1950 to May 2008), Embase (1980 to May 2008), and bibliographies of relevant articles. Review methods Two reviewers sought and assessed studies of people without neurological symptoms who underwent MRI of the brain with or without intravenous contrast for research purposes or for occupational, clinical, or commercial screening. Main outcome measures Overall disease specific and age specific prevalence of incidental brain findings, calculated by meta-analysis of pooled proportions using DerSimonian-Laird weights in a random effects model. Results In 16 studies, 135 of 19 559 people had neoplastic incidental brain findings (prevalence 0.70%, 95% confidence interval 0.47% to 0.98%), and prevalence increased with age (χ(2) for linear trend, P=0.003). In 15 studies, 375 of 15 559 people had non-neoplastic incidental brain findings (prevalence 2.0%, 1.1% to 3.1%, excluding white matter hyperintensities, silent infarcts, and microbleeds). The number of asymptomatic people needed to scan to detect any incidental brain finding was 37. The prevalence of incidental brain findings was higher in studies using high resolution MRI sequences than in those using standard resolution sequences (4.3% v 1.7%, P<0.001). The prevalence of neoplastic incidental brain findings increased with age. Conclusions Incidental findings on brain MRI are common, prevalence increases with age, and detection is more likely using high resolution MRI sequences than standard resolution sequences. These findings deserve to be mentioned when obtaining informed consent for brain MRI in research and clinical practice but are not sufficient to justify screening healthy asymptomatic people.
format Text
id pubmed-2728201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27282012009-12-02 Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis Morris, Zoe Whiteley, William N Longstreth, W T Weber, Frank Lee, Yi-Chung Tsushima, Yoshito Alphs, Hannah Ladd, Susanne C Warlow, Charles Wardlaw, Joanna M Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam BMJ Research Objective To quantify the prevalence of incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Data sources Ovid Medline (1950 to May 2008), Embase (1980 to May 2008), and bibliographies of relevant articles. Review methods Two reviewers sought and assessed studies of people without neurological symptoms who underwent MRI of the brain with or without intravenous contrast for research purposes or for occupational, clinical, or commercial screening. Main outcome measures Overall disease specific and age specific prevalence of incidental brain findings, calculated by meta-analysis of pooled proportions using DerSimonian-Laird weights in a random effects model. Results In 16 studies, 135 of 19 559 people had neoplastic incidental brain findings (prevalence 0.70%, 95% confidence interval 0.47% to 0.98%), and prevalence increased with age (χ(2) for linear trend, P=0.003). In 15 studies, 375 of 15 559 people had non-neoplastic incidental brain findings (prevalence 2.0%, 1.1% to 3.1%, excluding white matter hyperintensities, silent infarcts, and microbleeds). The number of asymptomatic people needed to scan to detect any incidental brain finding was 37. The prevalence of incidental brain findings was higher in studies using high resolution MRI sequences than in those using standard resolution sequences (4.3% v 1.7%, P<0.001). The prevalence of neoplastic incidental brain findings increased with age. Conclusions Incidental findings on brain MRI are common, prevalence increases with age, and detection is more likely using high resolution MRI sequences than standard resolution sequences. These findings deserve to be mentioned when obtaining informed consent for brain MRI in research and clinical practice but are not sufficient to justify screening healthy asymptomatic people. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2009-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2728201/ /pubmed/19687093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3016 Text en This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Morris, Zoe
Whiteley, William N
Longstreth, W T
Weber, Frank
Lee, Yi-Chung
Tsushima, Yoshito
Alphs, Hannah
Ladd, Susanne C
Warlow, Charles
Wardlaw, Joanna M
Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam
Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2728201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19687093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3016
work_keys_str_mv AT morriszoe incidentalfindingsonbrainmagneticresonanceimagingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT whiteleywilliamn incidentalfindingsonbrainmagneticresonanceimagingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT longstrethwt incidentalfindingsonbrainmagneticresonanceimagingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weberfrank incidentalfindingsonbrainmagneticresonanceimagingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leeyichung incidentalfindingsonbrainmagneticresonanceimagingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tsushimayoshito incidentalfindingsonbrainmagneticresonanceimagingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alphshannah incidentalfindingsonbrainmagneticresonanceimagingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT laddsusannec incidentalfindingsonbrainmagneticresonanceimagingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT warlowcharles incidentalfindingsonbrainmagneticresonanceimagingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wardlawjoannam incidentalfindingsonbrainmagneticresonanceimagingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alshahisalmanrustam incidentalfindingsonbrainmagneticresonanceimagingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis