Cargando…

Survival Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery versus Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Chemoresistant Cervical Cancer

The aim of this study was to analyze long-term survivals in patients with stage IB to IIA cervical cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting. Between February 1989 and January 1998, 94 women with previously untreated stage IB to IIA carcinoma of the uterine cervix who received cisplatin bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Youn Seok, Sin, Jeong-Im, Kim, Ju Hyun, Ye, Gi Won, Shin, Im Hee, Lee, Tae Sung
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2729891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16891813
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2006.21.4.683
_version_ 1782170833210310656
author Choi, Youn Seok
Sin, Jeong-Im
Kim, Ju Hyun
Ye, Gi Won
Shin, Im Hee
Lee, Tae Sung
author_facet Choi, Youn Seok
Sin, Jeong-Im
Kim, Ju Hyun
Ye, Gi Won
Shin, Im Hee
Lee, Tae Sung
author_sort Choi, Youn Seok
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to analyze long-term survivals in patients with stage IB to IIA cervical cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting. Between February 1989 and January 1998, 94 women with previously untreated stage IB to IIA carcinoma of the uterine cervix who received cisplatin based neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. All of patients with chemoresponse (complete response, n=15; partial response, n=47) and 16 patients with chemoresistance received radical surgery (RS group). The other 16 patients with chemoresistance received radiotherapy for definite treatment (RT group). In the RS group, the 10 yr survival estimation in patients with bulky tumors (diameter ≥4 cm, n=26) was similar to that with non-bulky tumors (83.3% vs. 89.3%, p=NS). In selected patients with chemoresistance, those treated by radiotherapy (n=16) showed significantly poorer survivals than those treated by radical surgery (n=16) [10 yr survival rates of RT (25%) vs. RS (76.4%), p=0.0111]. Our results support that a possible therapeutic benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery is only in patients with bulky stage IB to IIA cervical cancer. In cases of chemoresistance, radical surgery might be a better definite treatment option.
format Text
id pubmed-2729891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27298912009-08-24 Survival Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery versus Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Chemoresistant Cervical Cancer Choi, Youn Seok Sin, Jeong-Im Kim, Ju Hyun Ye, Gi Won Shin, Im Hee Lee, Tae Sung J Korean Med Sci Original Article The aim of this study was to analyze long-term survivals in patients with stage IB to IIA cervical cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting. Between February 1989 and January 1998, 94 women with previously untreated stage IB to IIA carcinoma of the uterine cervix who received cisplatin based neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. All of patients with chemoresponse (complete response, n=15; partial response, n=47) and 16 patients with chemoresistance received radical surgery (RS group). The other 16 patients with chemoresistance received radiotherapy for definite treatment (RT group). In the RS group, the 10 yr survival estimation in patients with bulky tumors (diameter ≥4 cm, n=26) was similar to that with non-bulky tumors (83.3% vs. 89.3%, p=NS). In selected patients with chemoresistance, those treated by radiotherapy (n=16) showed significantly poorer survivals than those treated by radical surgery (n=16) [10 yr survival rates of RT (25%) vs. RS (76.4%), p=0.0111]. Our results support that a possible therapeutic benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery is only in patients with bulky stage IB to IIA cervical cancer. In cases of chemoresistance, radical surgery might be a better definite treatment option. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2006-08 2006-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2729891/ /pubmed/16891813 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2006.21.4.683 Text en Copyright © 2006 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Choi, Youn Seok
Sin, Jeong-Im
Kim, Ju Hyun
Ye, Gi Won
Shin, Im Hee
Lee, Tae Sung
Survival Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery versus Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Chemoresistant Cervical Cancer
title Survival Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery versus Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Chemoresistant Cervical Cancer
title_full Survival Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery versus Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Chemoresistant Cervical Cancer
title_fullStr Survival Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery versus Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Chemoresistant Cervical Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Survival Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery versus Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Chemoresistant Cervical Cancer
title_short Survival Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery versus Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Chemoresistant Cervical Cancer
title_sort survival benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus radiotherapy in locally advanced chemoresistant cervical cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2729891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16891813
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2006.21.4.683
work_keys_str_mv AT choiyounseok survivalbenefitsofneoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyradicalsurgeryversusradiotherapyinlocallyadvancedchemoresistantcervicalcancer
AT sinjeongim survivalbenefitsofneoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyradicalsurgeryversusradiotherapyinlocallyadvancedchemoresistantcervicalcancer
AT kimjuhyun survivalbenefitsofneoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyradicalsurgeryversusradiotherapyinlocallyadvancedchemoresistantcervicalcancer
AT yegiwon survivalbenefitsofneoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyradicalsurgeryversusradiotherapyinlocallyadvancedchemoresistantcervicalcancer
AT shinimhee survivalbenefitsofneoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyradicalsurgeryversusradiotherapyinlocallyadvancedchemoresistantcervicalcancer
AT leetaesung survivalbenefitsofneoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyradicalsurgeryversusradiotherapyinlocallyadvancedchemoresistantcervicalcancer