Cargando…

Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance

BACKGROUND: One of the main limitations of many livestock breeding programs is that selection is in pure breeds housed in high-health environments but the aim is to improve crossbred performance under field conditions. Genomic selection (GS) using high-density genotyping could be used to address thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibánẽz-Escriche, Noelia, Fernando, Rohan L, Toosi, Ali, Dekkers, Jack CM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19284703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-12
_version_ 1782170862998257664
author Ibánẽz-Escriche, Noelia
Fernando, Rohan L
Toosi, Ali
Dekkers, Jack CM
author_facet Ibánẽz-Escriche, Noelia
Fernando, Rohan L
Toosi, Ali
Dekkers, Jack CM
author_sort Ibánẽz-Escriche, Noelia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One of the main limitations of many livestock breeding programs is that selection is in pure breeds housed in high-health environments but the aim is to improve crossbred performance under field conditions. Genomic selection (GS) using high-density genotyping could be used to address this. However in crossbred populations, 1) effects of SNPs may be breed specific, and 2) linkage disequilibrium may not be restricted to markers that are tightly linked to the QTL. In this study we apply GS to select for commercial crossbred performance and compare a model with breed-specific effects of SNP alleles (BSAM) to a model where SNP effects are assumed the same across breeds (ASGM). The impact of breed relatedness (generations since separation), size of the population used for training, and marker density were evaluated. Trait phenotype was controlled by 30 QTL and had a heritability of 0.30 for crossbred individuals. A Bayesian method (Bayes-B) was used to estimate the SNP effects in the crossbred training population and the accuracy of resulting GS breeding values for commercial crossbred performance was validated in the purebred population. RESULTS: Results demonstrate that crossbred data can be used to evaluate purebreds for commercial crossbred performance. Accuracies based on crossbred data were generally not much lower than accuracies based on pure breed data and almost identical when the breeds crossed were closely related breeds. The accuracy of both models (ASGM and BSAM) increased with marker density and size of the training data. Accuracies of both models also tended to decrease with increasing distance between breeds. However the effect of marker density, training data size and distance between breeds differed between the two models. BSAM only performed better than AGSM when the number of markers was small (500), the number of records used for training was large (4000), and when breeds were distantly related or unrelated. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, GS can be conducted in crossbred population and models that fit breed-specific effects of SNP alleles may not be necessary, especially with high marker density. This opens great opportunities for genetic improvement of purebreds for performance of their crossbred descendents in the field, without the need to track pedigrees through the system.
format Text
id pubmed-2730054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27300542009-08-24 Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance Ibánẽz-Escriche, Noelia Fernando, Rohan L Toosi, Ali Dekkers, Jack CM Genet Sel Evol Research BACKGROUND: One of the main limitations of many livestock breeding programs is that selection is in pure breeds housed in high-health environments but the aim is to improve crossbred performance under field conditions. Genomic selection (GS) using high-density genotyping could be used to address this. However in crossbred populations, 1) effects of SNPs may be breed specific, and 2) linkage disequilibrium may not be restricted to markers that are tightly linked to the QTL. In this study we apply GS to select for commercial crossbred performance and compare a model with breed-specific effects of SNP alleles (BSAM) to a model where SNP effects are assumed the same across breeds (ASGM). The impact of breed relatedness (generations since separation), size of the population used for training, and marker density were evaluated. Trait phenotype was controlled by 30 QTL and had a heritability of 0.30 for crossbred individuals. A Bayesian method (Bayes-B) was used to estimate the SNP effects in the crossbred training population and the accuracy of resulting GS breeding values for commercial crossbred performance was validated in the purebred population. RESULTS: Results demonstrate that crossbred data can be used to evaluate purebreds for commercial crossbred performance. Accuracies based on crossbred data were generally not much lower than accuracies based on pure breed data and almost identical when the breeds crossed were closely related breeds. The accuracy of both models (ASGM and BSAM) increased with marker density and size of the training data. Accuracies of both models also tended to decrease with increasing distance between breeds. However the effect of marker density, training data size and distance between breeds differed between the two models. BSAM only performed better than AGSM when the number of markers was small (500), the number of records used for training was large (4000), and when breeds were distantly related or unrelated. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, GS can be conducted in crossbred population and models that fit breed-specific effects of SNP alleles may not be necessary, especially with high marker density. This opens great opportunities for genetic improvement of purebreds for performance of their crossbred descendents in the field, without the need to track pedigrees through the system. BioMed Central 2009-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2730054/ /pubmed/19284703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-12 Text en Copyright © 2009 Ibánẽz-Escriche et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ibánẽz-Escriche, Noelia
Fernando, Rohan L
Toosi, Ali
Dekkers, Jack CM
Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance
title Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance
title_full Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance
title_fullStr Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance
title_full_unstemmed Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance
title_short Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance
title_sort genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19284703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-12
work_keys_str_mv AT ibanezescrichenoelia genomicselectionofpurebredsforcrossbredperformance
AT fernandorohanl genomicselectionofpurebredsforcrossbredperformance
AT toosiali genomicselectionofpurebredsforcrossbredperformance
AT dekkersjackcm genomicselectionofpurebredsforcrossbredperformance