Cargando…
Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis
On November 11, 2001, following the bioterrorism-related anthrax attacks, the U.S. Postal Service collected samples at the Southern Connecticut Processing and Distribution Center; all samples were negative for Bacillus anthracis. After a patient in Connecticut died from inhalational anthrax on Novem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12396920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020398 |
_version_ | 1782170878286495744 |
---|---|
author | Teshale, Eyasu H. Painter, John Burr, Gregory A. Mead, Paul Wright, Scott V. Cseh, Larry F. Zabrocki, Ronald Collins, Rick Kelley, Kathy A. Hadler, James L. Swerdlow, David L. |
author_facet | Teshale, Eyasu H. Painter, John Burr, Gregory A. Mead, Paul Wright, Scott V. Cseh, Larry F. Zabrocki, Ronald Collins, Rick Kelley, Kathy A. Hadler, James L. Swerdlow, David L. |
author_sort | Teshale, Eyasu H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | On November 11, 2001, following the bioterrorism-related anthrax attacks, the U.S. Postal Service collected samples at the Southern Connecticut Processing and Distribution Center; all samples were negative for Bacillus anthracis. After a patient in Connecticut died from inhalational anthrax on November 19, the center was sampled again on November 21 and 25 by using dry and wet swabs. All samples were again negative for B. anthracis. On November 28, guided by information from epidemiologic investigation, we sampled the site extensively with wet wipes and surface vacuum sock samples (using HEPA vacuum). Of 212 samples, 6 (3%) were positive, including one from a highly contaminated sorter. Subsequently B. anthracis was also detected in mail-sorting bins used for the patient’s carrier route. These results suggest cross-contaminated mail as a possible source of anthrax for the inhalational anthrax patient in Connecticut. In future such investigations, extensive sampling guided by epidemiologic data is imperative. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2730287 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27302872009-09-16 Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis Teshale, Eyasu H. Painter, John Burr, Gregory A. Mead, Paul Wright, Scott V. Cseh, Larry F. Zabrocki, Ronald Collins, Rick Kelley, Kathy A. Hadler, James L. Swerdlow, David L. Emerg Infect Dis Dispatch On November 11, 2001, following the bioterrorism-related anthrax attacks, the U.S. Postal Service collected samples at the Southern Connecticut Processing and Distribution Center; all samples were negative for Bacillus anthracis. After a patient in Connecticut died from inhalational anthrax on November 19, the center was sampled again on November 21 and 25 by using dry and wet swabs. All samples were again negative for B. anthracis. On November 28, guided by information from epidemiologic investigation, we sampled the site extensively with wet wipes and surface vacuum sock samples (using HEPA vacuum). Of 212 samples, 6 (3%) were positive, including one from a highly contaminated sorter. Subsequently B. anthracis was also detected in mail-sorting bins used for the patient’s carrier route. These results suggest cross-contaminated mail as a possible source of anthrax for the inhalational anthrax patient in Connecticut. In future such investigations, extensive sampling guided by epidemiologic data is imperative. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2002-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2730287/ /pubmed/12396920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020398 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Dispatch Teshale, Eyasu H. Painter, John Burr, Gregory A. Mead, Paul Wright, Scott V. Cseh, Larry F. Zabrocki, Ronald Collins, Rick Kelley, Kathy A. Hadler, James L. Swerdlow, David L. Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis |
title | Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis |
title_full | Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis |
title_fullStr | Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis |
title_full_unstemmed | Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis |
title_short | Environmental Sampling for Spores of Bacillus anthracis |
title_sort | environmental sampling for spores of bacillus anthracis |
topic | Dispatch |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12396920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020398 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teshaleeyasuh environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT painterjohn environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT burrgregorya environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT meadpaul environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT wrightscottv environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT csehlarryf environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT zabrockironald environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT collinsrick environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT kelleykathya environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT hadlerjamesl environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT swerdlowdavidl environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis AT environmentalsamplingforsporesofbacillusanthracis |