Cargando…
Surveillance for Anthrax Cases Associated with Contaminated Letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001
In October 2001, two inhalational anthrax and four cutaneous anthrax cases, resulting from the processing of Bacillus anthracis–containing envelopes at a New Jersey mail facility, were identified. Subsequently, we initiated stimulated passive hospital-based and enhanced passive surveillance for anth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12396918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020322 |
_version_ | 1782170878760452096 |
---|---|
author | Tan, Christina G. Sandhu, Hardeep S. Crawford, Dana C. Redd, Stephen C. Beach, Michael J. Buehler, James Bresnitz, Eddy A. Pinner, Robert W. Bell, Beth P. |
author_facet | Tan, Christina G. Sandhu, Hardeep S. Crawford, Dana C. Redd, Stephen C. Beach, Michael J. Buehler, James Bresnitz, Eddy A. Pinner, Robert W. Bell, Beth P. |
author_sort | Tan, Christina G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In October 2001, two inhalational anthrax and four cutaneous anthrax cases, resulting from the processing of Bacillus anthracis–containing envelopes at a New Jersey mail facility, were identified. Subsequently, we initiated stimulated passive hospital-based and enhanced passive surveillance for anthrax-compatible syndromes. From October 24 to December 17, 2001, hospitals reported 240,160 visits and 7,109 intensive-care unit admissions in the surveillance area (population 6.7 million persons). Following a change to reporting criteria on November 8, the average of possible inhalational anthrax reports decreased 83% from 18 to 3 per day; the proportion of reports requiring follow-up increased from 37% (105/286) to 41% (47/116). Clinical follow-up was conducted on 214 of 464 possible inhalational anthrax patients and 98 possible cutaneous anthrax patients; 49 had additional laboratory testing. No additional cases were identified. To verify the limited scope of the outbreak, surveillance was essential, though labor-intensive. The flexibility of the system allowed interim evaluation, thus improving surveillance efficiency. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2730289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27302892009-09-16 Surveillance for Anthrax Cases Associated with Contaminated Letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001 Tan, Christina G. Sandhu, Hardeep S. Crawford, Dana C. Redd, Stephen C. Beach, Michael J. Buehler, James Bresnitz, Eddy A. Pinner, Robert W. Bell, Beth P. Emerg Infect Dis Dispatch In October 2001, two inhalational anthrax and four cutaneous anthrax cases, resulting from the processing of Bacillus anthracis–containing envelopes at a New Jersey mail facility, were identified. Subsequently, we initiated stimulated passive hospital-based and enhanced passive surveillance for anthrax-compatible syndromes. From October 24 to December 17, 2001, hospitals reported 240,160 visits and 7,109 intensive-care unit admissions in the surveillance area (population 6.7 million persons). Following a change to reporting criteria on November 8, the average of possible inhalational anthrax reports decreased 83% from 18 to 3 per day; the proportion of reports requiring follow-up increased from 37% (105/286) to 41% (47/116). Clinical follow-up was conducted on 214 of 464 possible inhalational anthrax patients and 98 possible cutaneous anthrax patients; 49 had additional laboratory testing. No additional cases were identified. To verify the limited scope of the outbreak, surveillance was essential, though labor-intensive. The flexibility of the system allowed interim evaluation, thus improving surveillance efficiency. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2002-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2730289/ /pubmed/12396918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020322 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Dispatch Tan, Christina G. Sandhu, Hardeep S. Crawford, Dana C. Redd, Stephen C. Beach, Michael J. Buehler, James Bresnitz, Eddy A. Pinner, Robert W. Bell, Beth P. Surveillance for Anthrax Cases Associated with Contaminated Letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001 |
title | Surveillance for Anthrax Cases Associated with Contaminated Letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001 |
title_full | Surveillance for Anthrax Cases Associated with Contaminated Letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001 |
title_fullStr | Surveillance for Anthrax Cases Associated with Contaminated Letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001 |
title_full_unstemmed | Surveillance for Anthrax Cases Associated with Contaminated Letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001 |
title_short | Surveillance for Anthrax Cases Associated with Contaminated Letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001 |
title_sort | surveillance for anthrax cases associated with contaminated letters, new jersey, delaware, and pennsylvania, 2001 |
topic | Dispatch |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12396918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020322 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanchristinag surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001 AT sandhuhardeeps surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001 AT crawforddanac surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001 AT reddstephenc surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001 AT beachmichaelj surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001 AT buehlerjames surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001 AT bresnitzeddya surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001 AT pinnerrobertw surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001 AT bellbethp surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001 AT surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001 AT surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001 |