Cargando…

Surveillance for Anthrax Cases Associated with Contaminated Letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001

In October 2001, two inhalational anthrax and four cutaneous anthrax cases, resulting from the processing of Bacillus anthracis–containing envelopes at a New Jersey mail facility, were identified. Subsequently, we initiated stimulated passive hospital-based and enhanced passive surveillance for anth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Christina G., Sandhu, Hardeep S., Crawford, Dana C., Redd, Stephen C., Beach, Michael J., Buehler, James, Bresnitz, Eddy A., Pinner, Robert W., Bell, Beth P.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12396918
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020322
_version_ 1782170878760452096
author Tan, Christina G.
Sandhu, Hardeep S.
Crawford, Dana C.
Redd, Stephen C.
Beach, Michael J.
Buehler, James
Bresnitz, Eddy A.
Pinner, Robert W.
Bell, Beth P.
author_facet Tan, Christina G.
Sandhu, Hardeep S.
Crawford, Dana C.
Redd, Stephen C.
Beach, Michael J.
Buehler, James
Bresnitz, Eddy A.
Pinner, Robert W.
Bell, Beth P.
author_sort Tan, Christina G.
collection PubMed
description In October 2001, two inhalational anthrax and four cutaneous anthrax cases, resulting from the processing of Bacillus anthracis–containing envelopes at a New Jersey mail facility, were identified. Subsequently, we initiated stimulated passive hospital-based and enhanced passive surveillance for anthrax-compatible syndromes. From October 24 to December 17, 2001, hospitals reported 240,160 visits and 7,109 intensive-care unit admissions in the surveillance area (population 6.7 million persons). Following a change to reporting criteria on November 8, the average of possible inhalational anthrax reports decreased 83% from 18 to 3 per day; the proportion of reports requiring follow-up increased from 37% (105/286) to 41% (47/116). Clinical follow-up was conducted on 214 of 464 possible inhalational anthrax patients and 98 possible cutaneous anthrax patients; 49 had additional laboratory testing. No additional cases were identified. To verify the limited scope of the outbreak, surveillance was essential, though labor-intensive. The flexibility of the system allowed interim evaluation, thus improving surveillance efficiency.
format Text
id pubmed-2730289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27302892009-09-16 Surveillance for Anthrax Cases Associated with Contaminated Letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001 Tan, Christina G. Sandhu, Hardeep S. Crawford, Dana C. Redd, Stephen C. Beach, Michael J. Buehler, James Bresnitz, Eddy A. Pinner, Robert W. Bell, Beth P. Emerg Infect Dis Dispatch In October 2001, two inhalational anthrax and four cutaneous anthrax cases, resulting from the processing of Bacillus anthracis–containing envelopes at a New Jersey mail facility, were identified. Subsequently, we initiated stimulated passive hospital-based and enhanced passive surveillance for anthrax-compatible syndromes. From October 24 to December 17, 2001, hospitals reported 240,160 visits and 7,109 intensive-care unit admissions in the surveillance area (population 6.7 million persons). Following a change to reporting criteria on November 8, the average of possible inhalational anthrax reports decreased 83% from 18 to 3 per day; the proportion of reports requiring follow-up increased from 37% (105/286) to 41% (47/116). Clinical follow-up was conducted on 214 of 464 possible inhalational anthrax patients and 98 possible cutaneous anthrax patients; 49 had additional laboratory testing. No additional cases were identified. To verify the limited scope of the outbreak, surveillance was essential, though labor-intensive. The flexibility of the system allowed interim evaluation, thus improving surveillance efficiency. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2002-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2730289/ /pubmed/12396918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020322 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Dispatch
Tan, Christina G.
Sandhu, Hardeep S.
Crawford, Dana C.
Redd, Stephen C.
Beach, Michael J.
Buehler, James
Bresnitz, Eddy A.
Pinner, Robert W.
Bell, Beth P.
Surveillance for Anthrax Cases Associated with Contaminated Letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001
title Surveillance for Anthrax Cases Associated with Contaminated Letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001
title_full Surveillance for Anthrax Cases Associated with Contaminated Letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001
title_fullStr Surveillance for Anthrax Cases Associated with Contaminated Letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001
title_full_unstemmed Surveillance for Anthrax Cases Associated with Contaminated Letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001
title_short Surveillance for Anthrax Cases Associated with Contaminated Letters, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, 2001
title_sort surveillance for anthrax cases associated with contaminated letters, new jersey, delaware, and pennsylvania, 2001
topic Dispatch
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12396918
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020322
work_keys_str_mv AT tanchristinag surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001
AT sandhuhardeeps surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001
AT crawforddanac surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001
AT reddstephenc surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001
AT beachmichaelj surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001
AT buehlerjames surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001
AT bresnitzeddya surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001
AT pinnerrobertw surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001
AT bellbethp surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001
AT surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001
AT surveillanceforanthraxcasesassociatedwithcontaminatedlettersnewjerseydelawareandpennsylvania2001