Cargando…
Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak among Postal Workers, Washington, D.C., 2001
In October 2001, four cases of inhalational anthrax occurred in workers in a Washington, D.C., mail facility that processed envelopes containing Bacillus anthracis spores. We reviewed the envelopes’ paths and obtained exposure histories and nasal swab cultures from postal workers. Environmental samp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12396917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020330 |
_version_ | 1782170881682833408 |
---|---|
author | Dewan, Puneet K. Fry, Alicia M. Laserson, Kayla Tierney, Bruce C. Quinn, Conrad P. Hayslett, James A. Broyles, Laura N. Shane, Andi Winthrop, Kevin L. Walks, Ivan Siegel, Larry Hales, Thomas Semenova, Vera A. Romero-Steiner, Sandra Elie, Cheryl Khabbaz, Rima Khan, Ali S. Hajjeh, Rana A. Schuchat, Anne |
author_facet | Dewan, Puneet K. Fry, Alicia M. Laserson, Kayla Tierney, Bruce C. Quinn, Conrad P. Hayslett, James A. Broyles, Laura N. Shane, Andi Winthrop, Kevin L. Walks, Ivan Siegel, Larry Hales, Thomas Semenova, Vera A. Romero-Steiner, Sandra Elie, Cheryl Khabbaz, Rima Khan, Ali S. Hajjeh, Rana A. Schuchat, Anne |
author_sort | Dewan, Puneet K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In October 2001, four cases of inhalational anthrax occurred in workers in a Washington, D.C., mail facility that processed envelopes containing Bacillus anthracis spores. We reviewed the envelopes’ paths and obtained exposure histories and nasal swab cultures from postal workers. Environmental sampling was performed. A sample of employees was assessed for antibody concentrations to B. anthracis protective antigen. Case-patients worked on nonoverlapping shifts throughout the facility. Environmental sampling showed diffuse contamination of the facility, suggesting multiple aerosolization events. Potential workplace exposures were similar for the case-patients and the sample of workers. All nasal swab cultures and serum antibody tests were negative. Available tools could not identify subgroups of employees at higher risk for exposure or disease. Prophylaxis was necessary for all employees. To protect postal workers against bioterrorism, measures to reduce the risk of occupational exposure are necessary. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2730301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27303012009-09-16 Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak among Postal Workers, Washington, D.C., 2001 Dewan, Puneet K. Fry, Alicia M. Laserson, Kayla Tierney, Bruce C. Quinn, Conrad P. Hayslett, James A. Broyles, Laura N. Shane, Andi Winthrop, Kevin L. Walks, Ivan Siegel, Larry Hales, Thomas Semenova, Vera A. Romero-Steiner, Sandra Elie, Cheryl Khabbaz, Rima Khan, Ali S. Hajjeh, Rana A. Schuchat, Anne Emerg Infect Dis Dispatch In October 2001, four cases of inhalational anthrax occurred in workers in a Washington, D.C., mail facility that processed envelopes containing Bacillus anthracis spores. We reviewed the envelopes’ paths and obtained exposure histories and nasal swab cultures from postal workers. Environmental sampling was performed. A sample of employees was assessed for antibody concentrations to B. anthracis protective antigen. Case-patients worked on nonoverlapping shifts throughout the facility. Environmental sampling showed diffuse contamination of the facility, suggesting multiple aerosolization events. Potential workplace exposures were similar for the case-patients and the sample of workers. All nasal swab cultures and serum antibody tests were negative. Available tools could not identify subgroups of employees at higher risk for exposure or disease. Prophylaxis was necessary for all employees. To protect postal workers against bioterrorism, measures to reduce the risk of occupational exposure are necessary. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2002-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2730301/ /pubmed/12396917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020330 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Dispatch Dewan, Puneet K. Fry, Alicia M. Laserson, Kayla Tierney, Bruce C. Quinn, Conrad P. Hayslett, James A. Broyles, Laura N. Shane, Andi Winthrop, Kevin L. Walks, Ivan Siegel, Larry Hales, Thomas Semenova, Vera A. Romero-Steiner, Sandra Elie, Cheryl Khabbaz, Rima Khan, Ali S. Hajjeh, Rana A. Schuchat, Anne Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak among Postal Workers, Washington, D.C., 2001 |
title | Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak among Postal Workers, Washington, D.C., 2001 |
title_full | Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak among Postal Workers, Washington, D.C., 2001 |
title_fullStr | Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak among Postal Workers, Washington, D.C., 2001 |
title_full_unstemmed | Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak among Postal Workers, Washington, D.C., 2001 |
title_short | Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak among Postal Workers, Washington, D.C., 2001 |
title_sort | inhalational anthrax outbreak among postal workers, washington, d.c., 2001 |
topic | Dispatch |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12396917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020330 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dewanpuneetk inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT fryaliciam inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT lasersonkayla inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT tierneybrucec inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT quinnconradp inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT hayslettjamesa inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT broyleslauran inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT shaneandi inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT winthropkevinl inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT walksivan inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT siegellarry inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT halesthomas inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT semenovaveraa inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT romerosteinersandra inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT eliecheryl inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT khabbazrima inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT khanalis inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT hajjehranaa inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT schuchatanne inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 AT inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001 |