Cargando…

Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak among Postal Workers, Washington, D.C., 2001

In October 2001, four cases of inhalational anthrax occurred in workers in a Washington, D.C., mail facility that processed envelopes containing Bacillus anthracis spores. We reviewed the envelopes’ paths and obtained exposure histories and nasal swab cultures from postal workers. Environmental samp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dewan, Puneet K., Fry, Alicia M., Laserson, Kayla, Tierney, Bruce C., Quinn, Conrad P., Hayslett, James A., Broyles, Laura N., Shane, Andi, Winthrop, Kevin L., Walks, Ivan, Siegel, Larry, Hales, Thomas, Semenova, Vera A., Romero-Steiner, Sandra, Elie, Cheryl, Khabbaz, Rima, Khan, Ali S., Hajjeh, Rana A., Schuchat, Anne
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12396917
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020330
_version_ 1782170881682833408
author Dewan, Puneet K.
Fry, Alicia M.
Laserson, Kayla
Tierney, Bruce C.
Quinn, Conrad P.
Hayslett, James A.
Broyles, Laura N.
Shane, Andi
Winthrop, Kevin L.
Walks, Ivan
Siegel, Larry
Hales, Thomas
Semenova, Vera A.
Romero-Steiner, Sandra
Elie, Cheryl
Khabbaz, Rima
Khan, Ali S.
Hajjeh, Rana A.
Schuchat, Anne
author_facet Dewan, Puneet K.
Fry, Alicia M.
Laserson, Kayla
Tierney, Bruce C.
Quinn, Conrad P.
Hayslett, James A.
Broyles, Laura N.
Shane, Andi
Winthrop, Kevin L.
Walks, Ivan
Siegel, Larry
Hales, Thomas
Semenova, Vera A.
Romero-Steiner, Sandra
Elie, Cheryl
Khabbaz, Rima
Khan, Ali S.
Hajjeh, Rana A.
Schuchat, Anne
author_sort Dewan, Puneet K.
collection PubMed
description In October 2001, four cases of inhalational anthrax occurred in workers in a Washington, D.C., mail facility that processed envelopes containing Bacillus anthracis spores. We reviewed the envelopes’ paths and obtained exposure histories and nasal swab cultures from postal workers. Environmental sampling was performed. A sample of employees was assessed for antibody concentrations to B. anthracis protective antigen. Case-patients worked on nonoverlapping shifts throughout the facility. Environmental sampling showed diffuse contamination of the facility, suggesting multiple aerosolization events. Potential workplace exposures were similar for the case-patients and the sample of workers. All nasal swab cultures and serum antibody tests were negative. Available tools could not identify subgroups of employees at higher risk for exposure or disease. Prophylaxis was necessary for all employees. To protect postal workers against bioterrorism, measures to reduce the risk of occupational exposure are necessary.
format Text
id pubmed-2730301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27303012009-09-16 Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak among Postal Workers, Washington, D.C., 2001 Dewan, Puneet K. Fry, Alicia M. Laserson, Kayla Tierney, Bruce C. Quinn, Conrad P. Hayslett, James A. Broyles, Laura N. Shane, Andi Winthrop, Kevin L. Walks, Ivan Siegel, Larry Hales, Thomas Semenova, Vera A. Romero-Steiner, Sandra Elie, Cheryl Khabbaz, Rima Khan, Ali S. Hajjeh, Rana A. Schuchat, Anne Emerg Infect Dis Dispatch In October 2001, four cases of inhalational anthrax occurred in workers in a Washington, D.C., mail facility that processed envelopes containing Bacillus anthracis spores. We reviewed the envelopes’ paths and obtained exposure histories and nasal swab cultures from postal workers. Environmental sampling was performed. A sample of employees was assessed for antibody concentrations to B. anthracis protective antigen. Case-patients worked on nonoverlapping shifts throughout the facility. Environmental sampling showed diffuse contamination of the facility, suggesting multiple aerosolization events. Potential workplace exposures were similar for the case-patients and the sample of workers. All nasal swab cultures and serum antibody tests were negative. Available tools could not identify subgroups of employees at higher risk for exposure or disease. Prophylaxis was necessary for all employees. To protect postal workers against bioterrorism, measures to reduce the risk of occupational exposure are necessary. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2002-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2730301/ /pubmed/12396917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020330 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Dispatch
Dewan, Puneet K.
Fry, Alicia M.
Laserson, Kayla
Tierney, Bruce C.
Quinn, Conrad P.
Hayslett, James A.
Broyles, Laura N.
Shane, Andi
Winthrop, Kevin L.
Walks, Ivan
Siegel, Larry
Hales, Thomas
Semenova, Vera A.
Romero-Steiner, Sandra
Elie, Cheryl
Khabbaz, Rima
Khan, Ali S.
Hajjeh, Rana A.
Schuchat, Anne
Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak among Postal Workers, Washington, D.C., 2001
title Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak among Postal Workers, Washington, D.C., 2001
title_full Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak among Postal Workers, Washington, D.C., 2001
title_fullStr Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak among Postal Workers, Washington, D.C., 2001
title_full_unstemmed Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak among Postal Workers, Washington, D.C., 2001
title_short Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak among Postal Workers, Washington, D.C., 2001
title_sort inhalational anthrax outbreak among postal workers, washington, d.c., 2001
topic Dispatch
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12396917
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020330
work_keys_str_mv AT dewanpuneetk inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT fryaliciam inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT lasersonkayla inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT tierneybrucec inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT quinnconradp inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT hayslettjamesa inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT broyleslauran inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT shaneandi inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT winthropkevinl inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT walksivan inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT siegellarry inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT halesthomas inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT semenovaveraa inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT romerosteinersandra inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT eliecheryl inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT khabbazrima inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT khanalis inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT hajjehranaa inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT schuchatanne inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001
AT inhalationalanthraxoutbreakamongpostalworkerswashingtondc2001