Cargando…
Anthrax Postexposure Prophylaxis in Postal Workers, Connecticut, 2001
After inhalational anthrax was diagnosed in a Connecticut woman on November 20, 2001, postexposure prophylaxis was recommended for postal workers at the regional mail facility serving the patient’s area. Although environmental testing at the facility yielded negative results, subsequent testing conf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12396928 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020346 |
_version_ | 1782170882609774592 |
---|---|
author | Williams, Jennifer L. Noviello, Stephanie S. Griffith, Kevin S. Wurtzel, Heather Hamborsky, Jennifer Perz, Joseph F. Williams, Ian T. Hadler, James L. Swerdlow, David L. Ridzon, Renee |
author_facet | Williams, Jennifer L. Noviello, Stephanie S. Griffith, Kevin S. Wurtzel, Heather Hamborsky, Jennifer Perz, Joseph F. Williams, Ian T. Hadler, James L. Swerdlow, David L. Ridzon, Renee |
author_sort | Williams, Jennifer L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | After inhalational anthrax was diagnosed in a Connecticut woman on November 20, 2001, postexposure prophylaxis was recommended for postal workers at the regional mail facility serving the patient’s area. Although environmental testing at the facility yielded negative results, subsequent testing confirmed the presence of Bacillus anthracis. We distributed questionnaires to 100 randomly selected postal workers within 20 days of initial prophylaxis. Ninety-four workers obtained antibiotics, 68 of whom started postexposure prophylaxis and 21 discontinued. Postal workers who stopped or never started taking prophylaxis cited as reasons disbelief regarding anthrax exposure, problems with adverse events, and initial reports of negative cultures. Postal workers with adverse events reported predominant symptoms of gastrointestinal distress and headache. The influence of these concerns on adherence suggests that communication about risks of acquiring anthrax, education about adverse events, and careful management of adverse events are essential elements in increasing adherence. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2730305 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-27303052009-09-16 Anthrax Postexposure Prophylaxis in Postal Workers, Connecticut, 2001 Williams, Jennifer L. Noviello, Stephanie S. Griffith, Kevin S. Wurtzel, Heather Hamborsky, Jennifer Perz, Joseph F. Williams, Ian T. Hadler, James L. Swerdlow, David L. Ridzon, Renee Emerg Infect Dis Dispatch After inhalational anthrax was diagnosed in a Connecticut woman on November 20, 2001, postexposure prophylaxis was recommended for postal workers at the regional mail facility serving the patient’s area. Although environmental testing at the facility yielded negative results, subsequent testing confirmed the presence of Bacillus anthracis. We distributed questionnaires to 100 randomly selected postal workers within 20 days of initial prophylaxis. Ninety-four workers obtained antibiotics, 68 of whom started postexposure prophylaxis and 21 discontinued. Postal workers who stopped or never started taking prophylaxis cited as reasons disbelief regarding anthrax exposure, problems with adverse events, and initial reports of negative cultures. Postal workers with adverse events reported predominant symptoms of gastrointestinal distress and headache. The influence of these concerns on adherence suggests that communication about risks of acquiring anthrax, education about adverse events, and careful management of adverse events are essential elements in increasing adherence. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2002-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2730305/ /pubmed/12396928 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020346 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Dispatch Williams, Jennifer L. Noviello, Stephanie S. Griffith, Kevin S. Wurtzel, Heather Hamborsky, Jennifer Perz, Joseph F. Williams, Ian T. Hadler, James L. Swerdlow, David L. Ridzon, Renee Anthrax Postexposure Prophylaxis in Postal Workers, Connecticut, 2001 |
title | Anthrax Postexposure Prophylaxis in Postal Workers, Connecticut, 2001 |
title_full | Anthrax Postexposure Prophylaxis in Postal Workers, Connecticut, 2001 |
title_fullStr | Anthrax Postexposure Prophylaxis in Postal Workers, Connecticut, 2001 |
title_full_unstemmed | Anthrax Postexposure Prophylaxis in Postal Workers, Connecticut, 2001 |
title_short | Anthrax Postexposure Prophylaxis in Postal Workers, Connecticut, 2001 |
title_sort | anthrax postexposure prophylaxis in postal workers, connecticut, 2001 |
topic | Dispatch |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12396928 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0810.020346 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamsjenniferl anthraxpostexposureprophylaxisinpostalworkersconnecticut2001 AT noviellostephanies anthraxpostexposureprophylaxisinpostalworkersconnecticut2001 AT griffithkevins anthraxpostexposureprophylaxisinpostalworkersconnecticut2001 AT wurtzelheather anthraxpostexposureprophylaxisinpostalworkersconnecticut2001 AT hamborskyjennifer anthraxpostexposureprophylaxisinpostalworkersconnecticut2001 AT perzjosephf anthraxpostexposureprophylaxisinpostalworkersconnecticut2001 AT williamsiant anthraxpostexposureprophylaxisinpostalworkersconnecticut2001 AT hadlerjamesl anthraxpostexposureprophylaxisinpostalworkersconnecticut2001 AT swerdlowdavidl anthraxpostexposureprophylaxisinpostalworkersconnecticut2001 AT ridzonrenee anthraxpostexposureprophylaxisinpostalworkersconnecticut2001 |