Cargando…
The double jeopardy of clustered measurement and cluster randomisation
Michael S Kramer and colleagues suggest that double clustering might explain the negative results of some cluster randomised trials and describe some strategies for avoiding the problem
Autores principales: | Kramer, Michael S, Martin, Richard M, Sterne, Jonathan A C, Shapiro, Stanley, Dahhou, Mourad, Platt, Robert W |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19700507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2900 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Double jeopardy?
por: Taylor, David A
Publicado: (2003) -
Double jeopardy
por: Buchanan, Mark
Publicado: (2005) -
Double jeopardy in inferring cognitive processes
por: Fific, Mario
Publicado: (2014) -
Unequal cluster sizes in stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a systematic review
por: Kristunas, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Clustering Deviation Index (CDI): a robust and accurate internal measure for evaluating scRNA-seq data clustering
por: Fang, Jiyuan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)