Cargando…

Tolerability of breast ductal lavage in women from families at high genetic risk of breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Ductal lavage (DL) has been proposed as a minimally-invasive, well-tolerated tool for obtaining breast epithelial cells for cytological evaluation of breast cancer risk. We report DL tolerability in BRCA1/2 mutation-positive and -negative women from an IRB-approved research study. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loud, Jennifer T, Beckjord, Ellen Burke, Nichols, Kathryn, Peters, June, Giusti, Ruthann, Greene, Mark H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2731043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19602282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-9-20
_version_ 1782170926373142528
author Loud, Jennifer T
Beckjord, Ellen Burke
Nichols, Kathryn
Peters, June
Giusti, Ruthann
Greene, Mark H
author_facet Loud, Jennifer T
Beckjord, Ellen Burke
Nichols, Kathryn
Peters, June
Giusti, Ruthann
Greene, Mark H
author_sort Loud, Jennifer T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ductal lavage (DL) has been proposed as a minimally-invasive, well-tolerated tool for obtaining breast epithelial cells for cytological evaluation of breast cancer risk. We report DL tolerability in BRCA1/2 mutation-positive and -negative women from an IRB-approved research study. METHODS: 165 BRCA1/2 mutation-positive, 26 mutation-negative and 3 mutation unknown women underwent mammography, breast MRI and DL. Psychological well-being and perceptions of pain were obtained before and after DL, and compared with pain experienced during other screening procedures. RESULTS: The average anticipated and experienced discomfort rating for DL, 47 and 48 (0–100), were significantly higher (p < 0.01) than the anticipated and experienced discomfort of mammogram (38 and 34), MRI (36 and 25) or nipple aspiration (42 and 27). Women with greater pre-existing emotional distress experienced more DL-related discomfort than they anticipated. Women reporting DL-related pain as worse than expected were nearly three times more likely to refuse subsequent DL than those reporting it as the same or better than expected. Twenty-five percent of participants refused repeat DL at first annual follow-up. CONCLUSION: DL was anticipated to be and experienced as more uncomfortable than other procedures used in breast cancer screening. Higher underlying psychological distress was associated with decreased DL tolerability.
format Text
id pubmed-2731043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27310432009-08-24 Tolerability of breast ductal lavage in women from families at high genetic risk of breast cancer Loud, Jennifer T Beckjord, Ellen Burke Nichols, Kathryn Peters, June Giusti, Ruthann Greene, Mark H BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Ductal lavage (DL) has been proposed as a minimally-invasive, well-tolerated tool for obtaining breast epithelial cells for cytological evaluation of breast cancer risk. We report DL tolerability in BRCA1/2 mutation-positive and -negative women from an IRB-approved research study. METHODS: 165 BRCA1/2 mutation-positive, 26 mutation-negative and 3 mutation unknown women underwent mammography, breast MRI and DL. Psychological well-being and perceptions of pain were obtained before and after DL, and compared with pain experienced during other screening procedures. RESULTS: The average anticipated and experienced discomfort rating for DL, 47 and 48 (0–100), were significantly higher (p < 0.01) than the anticipated and experienced discomfort of mammogram (38 and 34), MRI (36 and 25) or nipple aspiration (42 and 27). Women with greater pre-existing emotional distress experienced more DL-related discomfort than they anticipated. Women reporting DL-related pain as worse than expected were nearly three times more likely to refuse subsequent DL than those reporting it as the same or better than expected. Twenty-five percent of participants refused repeat DL at first annual follow-up. CONCLUSION: DL was anticipated to be and experienced as more uncomfortable than other procedures used in breast cancer screening. Higher underlying psychological distress was associated with decreased DL tolerability. BioMed Central 2009-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2731043/ /pubmed/19602282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-9-20 Text en Copyright © 2009 Loud et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Loud, Jennifer T
Beckjord, Ellen Burke
Nichols, Kathryn
Peters, June
Giusti, Ruthann
Greene, Mark H
Tolerability of breast ductal lavage in women from families at high genetic risk of breast cancer
title Tolerability of breast ductal lavage in women from families at high genetic risk of breast cancer
title_full Tolerability of breast ductal lavage in women from families at high genetic risk of breast cancer
title_fullStr Tolerability of breast ductal lavage in women from families at high genetic risk of breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Tolerability of breast ductal lavage in women from families at high genetic risk of breast cancer
title_short Tolerability of breast ductal lavage in women from families at high genetic risk of breast cancer
title_sort tolerability of breast ductal lavage in women from families at high genetic risk of breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2731043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19602282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-9-20
work_keys_str_mv AT loudjennifert tolerabilityofbreastductallavageinwomenfromfamiliesathighgeneticriskofbreastcancer
AT beckjordellenburke tolerabilityofbreastductallavageinwomenfromfamiliesathighgeneticriskofbreastcancer
AT nicholskathryn tolerabilityofbreastductallavageinwomenfromfamiliesathighgeneticriskofbreastcancer
AT petersjune tolerabilityofbreastductallavageinwomenfromfamiliesathighgeneticriskofbreastcancer
AT giustiruthann tolerabilityofbreastductallavageinwomenfromfamiliesathighgeneticriskofbreastcancer
AT greenemarkh tolerabilityofbreastductallavageinwomenfromfamiliesathighgeneticriskofbreastcancer