Cargando…

A method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary guideline development groups (GDGs) have considerable influence on UK healthcare policy and practice, but previous research suggests that research evidence is a variable influence on GDG recommendations. The Evidence into Recommendations (EiR) study has been set up to d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gardner, Benjamin, Davidson, Rosemary, McAteer, John, Michie, Susan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2731071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19656366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-48
_version_ 1782170932874313728
author Gardner, Benjamin
Davidson, Rosemary
McAteer, John
Michie, Susan
author_facet Gardner, Benjamin
Davidson, Rosemary
McAteer, John
Michie, Susan
author_sort Gardner, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary guideline development groups (GDGs) have considerable influence on UK healthcare policy and practice, but previous research suggests that research evidence is a variable influence on GDG recommendations. The Evidence into Recommendations (EiR) study has been set up to document social-psychological influences on GDG decision-making. In this paper we aim to evaluate the relevance of existing qualitative methodologies to the EiR study, and to develop a method best-suited to capturing influences on GDG decision-making. METHODS: A research team comprised of three postdoctoral research fellows and a multidisciplinary steering group assessed the utility of extant qualitative methodologies for coding verbatim GDG meeting transcripts and semi-structured interviews with GDG members. A unique configuration of techniques was developed to permit data reduction and analysis. RESULTS: Our method incorporates techniques from thematic analysis, grounded theory analysis, content analysis, and framework analysis. Thematic analysis of individual interviews conducted with group members at the start and end of the GDG process defines discrete problem areas to guide data extraction from GDG meeting transcripts. Data excerpts are coded both inductively and deductively, using concepts taken from theories of decision-making, social influence and group processes. These codes inform a framework analysis to describe and explain incidents within GDG meetings. We illustrate the application of the method by discussing some preliminary findings of a study of a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) acute physical health GDG. CONCLUSION: This method is currently being applied to study the meetings of three of NICE GDGs. These cover topics in acute physical health, mental health and public health, and comprise a total of 45 full-day meetings. The method offers potential for application to other health care and decision-making groups.
format Text
id pubmed-2731071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27310712009-08-24 A method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups Gardner, Benjamin Davidson, Rosemary McAteer, John Michie, Susan Implement Sci Methodology BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary guideline development groups (GDGs) have considerable influence on UK healthcare policy and practice, but previous research suggests that research evidence is a variable influence on GDG recommendations. The Evidence into Recommendations (EiR) study has been set up to document social-psychological influences on GDG decision-making. In this paper we aim to evaluate the relevance of existing qualitative methodologies to the EiR study, and to develop a method best-suited to capturing influences on GDG decision-making. METHODS: A research team comprised of three postdoctoral research fellows and a multidisciplinary steering group assessed the utility of extant qualitative methodologies for coding verbatim GDG meeting transcripts and semi-structured interviews with GDG members. A unique configuration of techniques was developed to permit data reduction and analysis. RESULTS: Our method incorporates techniques from thematic analysis, grounded theory analysis, content analysis, and framework analysis. Thematic analysis of individual interviews conducted with group members at the start and end of the GDG process defines discrete problem areas to guide data extraction from GDG meeting transcripts. Data excerpts are coded both inductively and deductively, using concepts taken from theories of decision-making, social influence and group processes. These codes inform a framework analysis to describe and explain incidents within GDG meetings. We illustrate the application of the method by discussing some preliminary findings of a study of a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) acute physical health GDG. CONCLUSION: This method is currently being applied to study the meetings of three of NICE GDGs. These cover topics in acute physical health, mental health and public health, and comprise a total of 45 full-day meetings. The method offers potential for application to other health care and decision-making groups. BioMed Central 2009-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2731071/ /pubmed/19656366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-48 Text en Copyright © 2009 Gardner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Gardner, Benjamin
Davidson, Rosemary
McAteer, John
Michie, Susan
A method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups
title A method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups
title_full A method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups
title_fullStr A method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups
title_full_unstemmed A method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups
title_short A method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups
title_sort method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2731071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19656366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-48
work_keys_str_mv AT gardnerbenjamin amethodforstudyingdecisionmakingbyguidelinedevelopmentgroups
AT davidsonrosemary amethodforstudyingdecisionmakingbyguidelinedevelopmentgroups
AT mcateerjohn amethodforstudyingdecisionmakingbyguidelinedevelopmentgroups
AT michiesusan amethodforstudyingdecisionmakingbyguidelinedevelopmentgroups
AT amethodforstudyingdecisionmakingbyguidelinedevelopmentgroups
AT gardnerbenjamin methodforstudyingdecisionmakingbyguidelinedevelopmentgroups
AT davidsonrosemary methodforstudyingdecisionmakingbyguidelinedevelopmentgroups
AT mcateerjohn methodforstudyingdecisionmakingbyguidelinedevelopmentgroups
AT michiesusan methodforstudyingdecisionmakingbyguidelinedevelopmentgroups
AT methodforstudyingdecisionmakingbyguidelinedevelopmentgroups