Cargando…

Contamination of equipment in emergency settings: An exploratory study with a targeted automated intervention

BACKGROUND: Despite standard manual decontamination, hospital equipment remains contaminated with microorganisms, contributing to nosocomial transmission and hospital acquired infections. This has the potential to negate the effects of healthcare workers' hand-washing protocols. In order to dec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obasi, Chidi, Agwu, Allison, Akinpelu, Wale, Hammons, Roger, Clark, Clyde, Etienne-cummings, Ralph, Hill, Peter, Rothman, Richard, Babalola, Stella, Ross, Tracy, Carroll, Karen, Asiyanbola, Bolanle
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2731103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19642994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-1164-3-8
_version_ 1782170940547792896
author Obasi, Chidi
Agwu, Allison
Akinpelu, Wale
Hammons, Roger
Clark, Clyde
Etienne-cummings, Ralph
Hill, Peter
Rothman, Richard
Babalola, Stella
Ross, Tracy
Carroll, Karen
Asiyanbola, Bolanle
author_facet Obasi, Chidi
Agwu, Allison
Akinpelu, Wale
Hammons, Roger
Clark, Clyde
Etienne-cummings, Ralph
Hill, Peter
Rothman, Richard
Babalola, Stella
Ross, Tracy
Carroll, Karen
Asiyanbola, Bolanle
author_sort Obasi, Chidi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite standard manual decontamination, hospital equipment remains contaminated with microorganisms, contributing to nosocomial transmission and hospital acquired infections. This has the potential to negate the effects of healthcare workers' hand-washing protocols. In order to decrease the likihood of equipment contamination, there has been a rise in the use of disposable pieces of equipment, especially non-critical disposables. However, these carry a significant cost, both a direct financial cost (running into billions of dollars), as well as a cost to the environment. This is important because we hope to contain the cost of healthcare, one way to do that, is to look to the hospitals themselves, for innovative solutions that maintain the standard of care. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of an simple decontamination device for use with portable hospital equipment, by comparing rates of residual contamination after use of the novel device versus those seen with standard manual decontamination methods. METHODS: The Self-cleaning Unit for the Decontamination of Small instruments (SUDS) is a user-friendly, automated instrument developed via multi-disciplinary collaboration for decontamination in the clinical area. Pre- and post- utilization of portable medical equipment in an emergency department (ED) setting were cultured. To evaluate durability of the decrease in antimicrobial contamination, objects were re-cultured 48 hours after SUDS cleaning and following re-introduction into the clinical setting. RESULTS: After manual decontamination, 25% (23/91) of the tested objects in the ED were found to be culture positive with clinically significant microorganisms(CSO). Fifteen percent (ED) of non-critical equipment tested had multiple organisms. Following the use of SUDS, the colonization rate decreased to 0%. Following SUDS treatment and re-introduction into the clinical settings, after 48 hours the contamination rates as reflected by the cultures remained 0%. CONCLUSION: Standard non-critical equipment is contaminated with clinically significant microorganisms. The SUDS device allows for effective and durable decontamination of hospital equipment of varying sizes in the clinical area without disrupting patient care.
format Text
id pubmed-2731103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27311032009-08-24 Contamination of equipment in emergency settings: An exploratory study with a targeted automated intervention Obasi, Chidi Agwu, Allison Akinpelu, Wale Hammons, Roger Clark, Clyde Etienne-cummings, Ralph Hill, Peter Rothman, Richard Babalola, Stella Ross, Tracy Carroll, Karen Asiyanbola, Bolanle Ann Surg Innov Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite standard manual decontamination, hospital equipment remains contaminated with microorganisms, contributing to nosocomial transmission and hospital acquired infections. This has the potential to negate the effects of healthcare workers' hand-washing protocols. In order to decrease the likihood of equipment contamination, there has been a rise in the use of disposable pieces of equipment, especially non-critical disposables. However, these carry a significant cost, both a direct financial cost (running into billions of dollars), as well as a cost to the environment. This is important because we hope to contain the cost of healthcare, one way to do that, is to look to the hospitals themselves, for innovative solutions that maintain the standard of care. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of an simple decontamination device for use with portable hospital equipment, by comparing rates of residual contamination after use of the novel device versus those seen with standard manual decontamination methods. METHODS: The Self-cleaning Unit for the Decontamination of Small instruments (SUDS) is a user-friendly, automated instrument developed via multi-disciplinary collaboration for decontamination in the clinical area. Pre- and post- utilization of portable medical equipment in an emergency department (ED) setting were cultured. To evaluate durability of the decrease in antimicrobial contamination, objects were re-cultured 48 hours after SUDS cleaning and following re-introduction into the clinical setting. RESULTS: After manual decontamination, 25% (23/91) of the tested objects in the ED were found to be culture positive with clinically significant microorganisms(CSO). Fifteen percent (ED) of non-critical equipment tested had multiple organisms. Following the use of SUDS, the colonization rate decreased to 0%. Following SUDS treatment and re-introduction into the clinical settings, after 48 hours the contamination rates as reflected by the cultures remained 0%. CONCLUSION: Standard non-critical equipment is contaminated with clinically significant microorganisms. The SUDS device allows for effective and durable decontamination of hospital equipment of varying sizes in the clinical area without disrupting patient care. BioMed Central 2009-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2731103/ /pubmed/19642994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-1164-3-8 Text en Copyright © 2009 Obasi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Obasi, Chidi
Agwu, Allison
Akinpelu, Wale
Hammons, Roger
Clark, Clyde
Etienne-cummings, Ralph
Hill, Peter
Rothman, Richard
Babalola, Stella
Ross, Tracy
Carroll, Karen
Asiyanbola, Bolanle
Contamination of equipment in emergency settings: An exploratory study with a targeted automated intervention
title Contamination of equipment in emergency settings: An exploratory study with a targeted automated intervention
title_full Contamination of equipment in emergency settings: An exploratory study with a targeted automated intervention
title_fullStr Contamination of equipment in emergency settings: An exploratory study with a targeted automated intervention
title_full_unstemmed Contamination of equipment in emergency settings: An exploratory study with a targeted automated intervention
title_short Contamination of equipment in emergency settings: An exploratory study with a targeted automated intervention
title_sort contamination of equipment in emergency settings: an exploratory study with a targeted automated intervention
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2731103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19642994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-1164-3-8
work_keys_str_mv AT obasichidi contaminationofequipmentinemergencysettingsanexploratorystudywithatargetedautomatedintervention
AT agwuallison contaminationofequipmentinemergencysettingsanexploratorystudywithatargetedautomatedintervention
AT akinpeluwale contaminationofequipmentinemergencysettingsanexploratorystudywithatargetedautomatedintervention
AT hammonsroger contaminationofequipmentinemergencysettingsanexploratorystudywithatargetedautomatedintervention
AT clarkclyde contaminationofequipmentinemergencysettingsanexploratorystudywithatargetedautomatedintervention
AT etiennecummingsralph contaminationofequipmentinemergencysettingsanexploratorystudywithatargetedautomatedintervention
AT hillpeter contaminationofequipmentinemergencysettingsanexploratorystudywithatargetedautomatedintervention
AT rothmanrichard contaminationofequipmentinemergencysettingsanexploratorystudywithatargetedautomatedintervention
AT babalolastella contaminationofequipmentinemergencysettingsanexploratorystudywithatargetedautomatedintervention
AT rosstracy contaminationofequipmentinemergencysettingsanexploratorystudywithatargetedautomatedintervention
AT carrollkaren contaminationofequipmentinemergencysettingsanexploratorystudywithatargetedautomatedintervention
AT asiyanbolabolanle contaminationofequipmentinemergencysettingsanexploratorystudywithatargetedautomatedintervention