Cargando…
A comparison between the APACHE II and Charlson Index Score for predicting hospital mortality in critically ill patients
BACKGROUND: Risk adjustment and mortality prediction in studies of critical care are usually performed using acuity of illness scores, such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), which emphasize physiological derangement. Common risk adjustment systems used in administrati...
Autores principales: | Quach, Susan, Hennessy, Deirdre A, Faris, Peter, Fong, Andrew, Quan, Hude, Doig, Christopher |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2731744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19643010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-129 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of Charlson comorbidity index with SAPS and APACHE scores for prediction of mortality following intensive care
por: Christensen, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Developing an adapted Charlson comorbidity index for ischemic stroke outcome studies
por: Hall, Ruth E., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Comparison of APACHE II and SAPS II Scoring Systems in Prediction of Critically Ill Patients’ Outcome
por: Aminiahidashti, Hamed, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Mortality prediction by hormonal profile versus APACHE score assessment in critically ill patients
por: Hassan, K Osman, et al.
Publicado: (2005) -
Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases
por: Li, Bing, et al.
Publicado: (2008)