Cargando…

Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the functional similarities in the socio-cognitive behaviour of dogs and humans emerged as a consequence of comparable environmental selection pressures. Here we use a novel approach to account for the facilitating effect of domestication in dogs and reveal tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gácsi, Márta, McGreevy, Paul, Kara, Edina, Miklósi, Ádám
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2731781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19630939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-5-31
_version_ 1782170973409116160
author Gácsi, Márta
McGreevy, Paul
Kara, Edina
Miklósi, Ádám
author_facet Gácsi, Márta
McGreevy, Paul
Kara, Edina
Miklósi, Ádám
author_sort Gácsi, Márta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the functional similarities in the socio-cognitive behaviour of dogs and humans emerged as a consequence of comparable environmental selection pressures. Here we use a novel approach to account for the facilitating effect of domestication in dogs and reveal that selection for two factors under genetic influence (visual cooperation and focused attention) may have led independently to increased comprehension of human communicational cues. METHOD: In Study 1, we observed the performance of three groups of dogs in utilizing the human pointing gesture in a two-way object choice test. We compared breeds selected to work while visually separated from human partners (N = 30, 21 breeds, clustered as independent worker group), with those selected to work in close cooperation and continuous visual contact with human partners (N = 30, 22 breeds, clustered as cooperative worker group), and with a group of mongrels (N = 30). Secondly, it has been reported that, in dogs, selective breeding to produce an abnormal shortening of the skull is associated with a more pronounced area centralis (location of greatest visual acuity). In Study 2, breeds with high cephalic index and more frontally placed eyes (brachycephalic breeds, N = 25, 14 breeds) were compared with breeds with low cephalic index and laterally placed eyes (dolichocephalic breeds, N = 25, 14 breeds). RESULTS: In Study 1, cooperative workers were significantly more successful in utilizing the human pointing gesture than both the independent workers and the mongrels. In study 2, we found that brachycephalic dogs performed significantly better than dolichocephalic breeds. DISCUSSION: After controlling for environmental factors, we have provided evidence that at least two independent phenotypic traits with certain genetic variability affect the ability of dogs to rely on human visual cues. This finding should caution researchers against making simple generalizations about the effects of domestication and on dog-wolf differences in the utilization of human visual signals.
format Text
id pubmed-2731781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-27317812009-08-26 Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs Gácsi, Márta McGreevy, Paul Kara, Edina Miklósi, Ádám Behav Brain Funct Research BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the functional similarities in the socio-cognitive behaviour of dogs and humans emerged as a consequence of comparable environmental selection pressures. Here we use a novel approach to account for the facilitating effect of domestication in dogs and reveal that selection for two factors under genetic influence (visual cooperation and focused attention) may have led independently to increased comprehension of human communicational cues. METHOD: In Study 1, we observed the performance of three groups of dogs in utilizing the human pointing gesture in a two-way object choice test. We compared breeds selected to work while visually separated from human partners (N = 30, 21 breeds, clustered as independent worker group), with those selected to work in close cooperation and continuous visual contact with human partners (N = 30, 22 breeds, clustered as cooperative worker group), and with a group of mongrels (N = 30). Secondly, it has been reported that, in dogs, selective breeding to produce an abnormal shortening of the skull is associated with a more pronounced area centralis (location of greatest visual acuity). In Study 2, breeds with high cephalic index and more frontally placed eyes (brachycephalic breeds, N = 25, 14 breeds) were compared with breeds with low cephalic index and laterally placed eyes (dolichocephalic breeds, N = 25, 14 breeds). RESULTS: In Study 1, cooperative workers were significantly more successful in utilizing the human pointing gesture than both the independent workers and the mongrels. In study 2, we found that brachycephalic dogs performed significantly better than dolichocephalic breeds. DISCUSSION: After controlling for environmental factors, we have provided evidence that at least two independent phenotypic traits with certain genetic variability affect the ability of dogs to rely on human visual cues. This finding should caution researchers against making simple generalizations about the effects of domestication and on dog-wolf differences in the utilization of human visual signals. BioMed Central 2009-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2731781/ /pubmed/19630939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-5-31 Text en Copyright © 2009 Gácsi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Gácsi, Márta
McGreevy, Paul
Kara, Edina
Miklósi, Ádám
Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs
title Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs
title_full Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs
title_fullStr Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs
title_short Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs
title_sort effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2731781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19630939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-5-31
work_keys_str_mv AT gacsimarta effectsofselectionforcooperationandattentionindogs
AT mcgreevypaul effectsofselectionforcooperationandattentionindogs
AT karaedina effectsofselectionforcooperationandattentionindogs
AT miklosiadam effectsofselectionforcooperationandattentionindogs